My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater |
Jan 23 2009, 09:32 AM
Post
#121
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 30-March 05 Member No.: 223 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 04:52 PM
Post
#122
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
An update gleaned from the PDT:
Second part of the Ranger pan tosol (to make a 15x2) then driving the sol after next (1780). -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 10:00 PM
Post
#123
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2922 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
[attachment=17030:Untitled_1.jpg] Is it me or the images processing by our wizards has improved THAT much ? -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 10:02 PM
Post
#124
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2922 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
An update gleaned from the PDT: Second part of the Ranger pan tosol (to make a 15x2) then driving the sol after next (1780). I guess we're in restricted sols these days -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 10:20 PM
Post
#125
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
I don't think you can say that based on this plan, as we stopped to image Ranger anyway. No driving on sol 1789 is likely a result of it being the weekend, restricted or not she could still have driven on that sol.
Of course we could be in restricted sols, I have completely lost track of when they fall. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 10:49 PM
Post
#126
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2922 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
I agree James.
Nevertheless I was (also) refering to this post: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=127527 (mine actually) that was ok till conjunction but could have drifted ever since. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 24 2009, 07:44 PM
Post
#127
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 233 Joined: 21-April 05 Member No.: 328 |
That is so damned cool, to be able to image a small crater (Ranger) from orbit and then drive right up to it! And again, this is exactly what Mars should look like -- a barren plain dotted with small craters!!! Tesheiner, Astro0, et al, thanks!
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 04:44 PM
Post
#128
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3431 Joined: 11-August 04 From: USA Member No.: 98 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 09:14 PM
Post
#129
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Great!
Comparing the pictures taken from the current site with previous ones, specially the navcams, I have the impression that the ripples are becoming smaller again. Have a look to the map too and scroll down from sol 1780's position. |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 10:46 PM
Post
#130
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 30-March 05 Member No.: 223 |
Great! Comparing the pictures taken from the current site with previous ones, specially the navcams, I have the impression that the ripples are becoming smaller again. Yup ! I'm hoping to resume our pre-conjunction 100+ meters-per-sol driving regime soon ... However, I'm a bit concernd about a remark I read sometime ago, that due to the new Odysee passing times, Oppys daily driving window will be significantly restricted such that we can no longer do long single-sol drives. Could some one of the rover experts confirm this ? |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 11:15 PM
Post
#131
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
No reason why they couldn't carry on driving past the comms pass. It would mean a restricted-sols type situation for the end-drive location, but it would mean a longer drive if it was possible/required.
Doug |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 11:49 PM
Post
#132
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 978 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
Except that later in the day we might have issues with post-drive imaging (yes that can be taken on the subsequent sol) and if autonav is used, driving with very little light can make things a bit difficult. I'm not sure about the impact on ambient temperature at that time of day.
Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 12:13 AM
Post
#133
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I wasn't proposing post-drive imaging any later than it normally is, but we did read somewhere that MODY was being shifted to earlier in the day so that it wouldn't be fortuitously overhead at a normal 'done for the day' sort of time anymore.
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 12:35 AM
Post
#134
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 978 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
I wasn't proposing post-drive imaging any later than it normally is, but we did read somewhere that MODY was being shifted to earlier in the day so that it wouldn't be fortuitously overhead at a normal 'done for the day' sort of time anymore. The times I heard there would not be much time post-ODY. Moreover, the drive happening post-ODY should check what happened in the drive pre-ODY. There are certain conditions which would be difficult to check/predict at the the time of sequencing. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it would make my life miserable ;-) I also know full well I have to get ready for this since it will likely happen on MSL as well (=drive sequences broken up in different time segments). Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 06:31 PM
Post
#135
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:26 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|