IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

37 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater
Nirgal
post Jan 23 2009, 09:32 AM
Post #121


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Jan 23 2009, 12:02 AM) *
Some may think that this is just another pothole on the Road to Endeavour, but I still think it's worthy of a photo wink.gif

Astro0


Beautiful one, Astro0 !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jan 23 2009, 04:52 PM
Post #122


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



An update gleaned from the PDT:

Second part of the Ranger pan tosol (to make a 15x2) then driving the sol after next (1780). wheel.gif


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 23 2009, 10:00 PM
Post #123


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Jan 23 2009, 01:01 AM) *
[attachment=17030:Untitled_1.jpg]

Is it me or the images processing by our wizards has improved THAT much ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 23 2009, 10:02 PM
Post #124


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Jan 23 2009, 05:52 PM) *
An update gleaned from the PDT:

Second part of the Ranger pan tosol (to make a 15x2) then driving the sol after next (1780). wheel.gif

I guess we're in restricted sols these days


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jan 23 2009, 10:20 PM
Post #125


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



I don't think you can say that based on this plan, as we stopped to image Ranger anyway. No driving on sol 1789 is likely a result of it being the weekend, restricted or not she could still have driven on that sol.

Of course we could be in restricted sols, I have completely lost track of when they fall.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 23 2009, 10:49 PM
Post #126


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I agree James.
Nevertheless I was (also) refering to this post: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=127527 (mine actually) that was ok till conjunction but could have drifted ever since.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jan 24 2009, 07:44 PM
Post #127


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



That is so damned cool, to be able to image a small crater (Ranger) from orbit and then drive right up to it! And again, this is exactly what Mars should look like -- a barren plain dotted with small craters!!! Tesheiner, Astro0, et al, thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Jan 26 2009, 04:44 PM
Post #128


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



We've moved south. Bye-bye, Ranger.

Here's an anaglyph mosaic of the Pancam drive direction view south on Sol 1780:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jan 26 2009, 09:14 PM
Post #129


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4280
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Great!
Comparing the pictures taken from the current site with previous ones, specially the navcams, I have the impression that the ripples are becoming smaller again. Have a look to the map too and scroll down from sol 1780's position.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Jan 26 2009, 10:46 PM
Post #130


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jan 26 2009, 10:14 PM) *
Great!
Comparing the pictures taken from the current site with previous ones, specially the navcams, I have the impression that the ripples are becoming smaller again.


Yup ! I'm hoping to resume our pre-conjunction 100+ meters-per-sol driving regime soon ... smile.gif

However, I'm a bit concernd about a remark I read sometime ago, that due to the new Odysee passing times, Oppys daily driving window will be significantly restricted such that we can no longer do long single-sol drives. Could some one of the rover experts confirm this ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 26 2009, 11:15 PM
Post #131


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



No reason why they couldn't carry on driving past the comms pass. It would mean a restricted-sols type situation for the end-drive location, but it would mean a longer drive if it was possible/required.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Jan 26 2009, 11:49 PM
Post #132


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 978
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



Except that later in the day we might have issues with post-drive imaging (yes that can be taken on the subsequent sol) and if autonav is used, driving with very little light can make things a bit difficult. I'm not sure about the impact on ambient temperature at that time of day.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 27 2009, 12:13 AM
Post #133


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I wasn't proposing post-drive imaging any later than it normally is, but we did read somewhere that MODY was being shifted to earlier in the day so that it wouldn't be fortuitously overhead at a normal 'done for the day' sort of time anymore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Jan 27 2009, 12:35 AM
Post #134


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 978
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 26 2009, 04:13 PM) *
I wasn't proposing post-drive imaging any later than it normally is, but we did read somewhere that MODY was being shifted to earlier in the day so that it wouldn't be fortuitously overhead at a normal 'done for the day' sort of time anymore.


The times I heard there would not be much time post-ODY. Moreover, the drive happening post-ODY should check what happened in the drive pre-ODY. There are certain conditions which would be difficult to check/predict at the the time of sequencing. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it would make my life miserable ;-) I also know full well I have to get ready for this since it will likely happen on MSL as well (=drive sequences broken up in different time segments).

Paolo



--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jan 27 2009, 06:31 PM
Post #135


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Mosaic taken on 1773 named 'Pavement Textures' on the PDT site.



James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

37 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:26 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.