IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

37 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater
Nirgal
post Jan 29 2009, 11:12 PM
Post #166


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (SFJCody @ Jan 29 2009, 09:30 PM) *
What I find amazing about the idea of Opportunity going to Endeavour is that the crater is so big that if it had appeared in the landing ellipse the ...This will be like nothing we've seen from the rovers before!


Exactly my feelings too smile.gif
Thats one of the reasons I like the long distance driving: if it puts us so well beyond the original landing ellipse, it is a bit like landing another spacecraft at another position - for the price of one real landing plus driving wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 29 2009, 11:28 PM
Post #167


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



We left the landing ellipse before we even got to the etched terrain at Erebus iirc - that terrain wasn't considered safe for landing even.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Jan 30 2009, 02:51 AM
Post #168


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



It only goes to show how important ground truth is.... even MROs wondrous images are just whetting the appetite!


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jan 30 2009, 08:05 AM
Post #169


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 29 2009, 11:28 PM) *
We left the landing ellipse before we even got to the etched terrain at Erebus iirc - that terrain wasn't considered safe for landing even.

Doug


I dunno. Looking at the original ellipse it seems there was some etched terrain off to the west of the rover even before Erebus/the edge of the ellipse.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 30 2009, 08:58 AM
Post #170


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



But look at all the etched terrain to the south (and Squyres mentioned this in on of the Q'n'A's a few years back)

We are in terrain that was intentionally avoided at landing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Jan 30 2009, 03:59 PM
Post #171


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Looks like roughly another 100m or so on sol 1784.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 30 2009, 04:31 PM
Post #172


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Latest batch of my 3D images collected here...

http://roadtoendeavour.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/3dfest


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 30 2009, 05:57 PM
Post #173


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10255
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Attached Image


Here we are...

Attached Image


Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jan 30 2009, 06:41 PM
Post #174


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Nice. I wondered if we would head for that linear feature.

Phil, I would have positioned Oppy about one red-dot-diameter further south from where you have it - we're just the south side of the NE-SW feature.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 30 2009, 07:05 PM
Post #175


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10255
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Well, I can't move it now, I flattened the image. Young Oppers will have to back up.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tdemko
post Jan 31 2009, 02:18 AM
Post #176


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Member No.: 9



Looks like the linear feature of interest is a monocline with a small displacement crestal normal fault

My 5 minute Sumo Paint interpretation:

Attached Image




--------------------
Tim Demko
BioLink site
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Jan 31 2009, 03:45 AM
Post #177


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



QUOTE (tdemko @ Jan 30 2009, 09:18 PM) *
Looks like the linear feature of interest is a monocline with a small displacement crestal normal fault


Coooooool.

How did it form? What does it mean?

(....and is that a little bitty crater next to it on the left?)


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tdemko
post Jan 31 2009, 02:26 PM
Post #178


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (Juramike @ Jan 30 2009, 09:45 PM) *
How did it form? What does it mean?

(....and is that a little bitty crater next to it on the left?)


5 more minutes on Sumo Paint yields this:

Attached Image



And yes, that does look like a mini-crater. The dip panels suggest maybe a low angle impact towards about 11 o'clock, with some low angle dips on the right side of the crater and some bi-directional steeper dips over a small fold on the upper left side (weathering in a rubbly slope).

Attached Image


Can ya tell I'm lovin' the Sumo Paint? Best Internet-Mars-Geology-Field-Camp mapping tool there is!


--------------------
Tim Demko
BioLink site
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Jan 31 2009, 11:04 PM
Post #179


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



That will make a neat illustration for: laugh.gif

"Roadside Geology of Mars"
"Mars Highway 1: Victoria Crater to Endeavour Crater"


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 31 2009, 11:16 PM
Post #180


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Better view...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

37 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:28 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.