IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Discussion of Royal Society Titan reviews
ngunn
post Mar 3 2009, 10:19 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Although very properly linked via 'Conferences and Publications' this is an exclusively Titan topic so it seems right to locate any discussion of the papers here.

For convenience, the link again: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ic=5857&hl=

I was struck by this sentence from the concluding section of the second paper (Tobie et. al.):

"Even though the interior is mostly composed of water ice and various hydrates, the near-surface is probably dominated by organic materials. Interaction of liquid methane and other liquid hydrocarbons with such solid organic deposits probably shaped the landscape of Titan. Water ice and hydrated materials should dominate only in cryovolcanically active provinces."

I would add that to resupply the atmospheric methane the 'cryovolcanism' need not even be sufficiently violent to bring water ice all the way to the surface. On this assessment whatever forms the bright highlands of Titan is not water ice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
rlorenz
post Mar 7 2009, 04:23 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (ngunn @ Mar 3 2009, 05:19 AM) *
I was struck by this sentence from the concluding section of the second paper (Tobie et. al.):
"Even though the interior is mostly composed of water ice and various hydrates, the near-surface is probably dominated by organic materials. ....."


'struck' ? Sorry, but this has been obvious for a long time. To quote myself from 2 days after the first
Cassini encounter TA (Oct 2004)

"With the radar in its active mode, it is like shouting at Titan and listening for the echoes," said Dr. Ralph Lorenz, Cassini radar team member, University of Arizona, Tucson. "But we can also just listen with the sensitive radar receiver, the radiometry. The radiometry data shows early indications of the composition of the surface materials. One interpretation of what it is telling us is that Titan is a place covered with organics."

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/newsreleas...elease20041029/

The deep bedrock is water ice (and/or ammonia hydrate and/or clathrates) but certainly the upper veneer
seems to be organic-rich more or less globally. There is also the question of how to form the 'karst' lakes
in the north - water ice shouldnt be that soluble in liquid hydrocarbons, but other organics might be..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Mar 7 2009, 07:36 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (rlorenz @ Mar 7 2009, 04:23 PM) *
The deep bedrock is water ice (and/or ammonia hydrate and/or clathrates) but certainly the upper veneer
seems to be organic-rich more or less globally.


Yeah, I'm familiar with the veneer idea and I did know we're not looking at naked bedrock ice. Maybe I mistook the word veneer - I took it to mean a few mm of 'smust' or whatever, possibly removable by a rainstorm. Now I'm wondering if the ridges and river-dissected islands (like the ones Huygens observed) could be built almost entirely of organic materials, with the presumed icy substrate actually a long way further down - maybe a kilometer or more. In another thread there was mention of a possible future Titan lander designed to study ices. I assumed (again perhaps erroneously) that this meant aqueous ices. I will try to locate that. Always glad to have my muddled assumptions straightened out. smile.gif

On the northern 'karst' lakes - if they are formed into kilometer-deep piles of organic sediment rather than water ice 'rock' then presumably you wouldn't need to dissolve water ice to form them.

Mike, you might like to try a beaker of powdered plastic (sawdust? coffee?) and see how well that holds on to the heptane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Mar 8 2009, 04:27 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



QUOTE (ngunn @ Mar 7 2009, 02:36 PM) *
On the northern 'karst' lakes - if they are formed into kilometer-deep piles of organic sediment rather than water ice 'rock' then presumably you wouldn't need to dissolve water ice to form them.



As for the 'karst' lakes, the lake solvents don't need to fully dissolve the substrate, the solvents just needs to break it down or weaken the structure.

If there were organic-coated water ice grains all stuck together, then you dissolve the organic coating in hydrocarbon solvent, the remaining insoluble water ice grains are all in a suspension and can settle out or be physically carried away.

[BTW, this is very similar to how "Wettable powders" work for pesticide formulations, there is an outer aqueous soluble coating of the insoluble pesticide grain. Dissolve the coating, et voila! the grain is in aqueous suspension.]

I'm a big fan of hydrocarbon or organic-coated water ice grains on the surface Titan.
It could explain the spectral signature (kinda-sorta water-ice like in some spectral regions)
and also the dielectric constant (way too low for ice)
and also the visual characteristics: bright "purer" highlands, rewoked in the channels, and even more processed and reworked in the basins.

-Mike







--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:13 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.