IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Opportunity Plans
Nix
post Jan 9 2005, 01:53 PM
Post #1


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



Nasa announced earlier that Opportunity will head for Vostok Crater, due South.
I assembled this colored mosaic to get a better idea of what lies ahead. Reaching the crater Victoria in the south should not be a problem, I only hope the rocky terrain north of the crater will allow Opportunity to travel in more or less a straight line. There sure are plenty of interesting sites to explore in this area! mars.gif rolleyes.gif
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (15 - 29)
David
post Jan 11 2005, 05:19 PM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



Are all of these sites still within Opportunity's original landing ellipse, or will Opportunity leave the ellipse if it gets as far as Victoria?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jan 11 2005, 05:38 PM
Post #17





Guests






http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/01/24/

Victoria Crater and some of the Etched Terrain are well outside the landing ellipse.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Jan 11 2005, 05:50 PM
Post #18


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



Victoria is outside of the landing ellipse. The landing ellipse cuts through the middle of the etched terrain.

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/0...llipsefinal.jpg

edit: Thanks Sunspot smile.gif I was sitting at the edit screen too long laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MizarKey
post Jan 11 2005, 09:44 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 295
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Central California
Member No.: 45



Given the relative flatness of Meridiani, I hope they decide to take Oppy to one of the hill like protrusions toward the east end of the ellipse in Pando's post. Might take a bit to get there, but it would be a nice change of scenery.

Eric P / MizarKey mars.gif


--------------------
Eric P / MizarKey
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 11 2005, 10:09 PM
Post #20


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Victoria crater seems like the best 'cool thing' for 100's of sols of driving in any direction to me. it's likely to have 50 - 100 metre depth - 10m cliffs at the edge - and seemingly routes in, and would be a fitting end-of-mission location

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Jan 12 2005, 12:04 AM
Post #21


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



QUOTE
I hope they decide to take Oppy to one of the hill like protrusions toward the east end of the ellipse


I'm not sure what hills you are referring to, but there seems to be two eroded *craters* at the end (or slightly below) the right end of the landing ellipse. The Victoria Crater appears to be relatively young compared to these though, and is therefore a much more interesting science target.

Also, notice a huge (and I mean Huge) crater-like structure at the lower right corner of that image, with barely one quarter of it visible. It's so huge that it would be unrecognizable at ground level...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David
post Jan 12 2005, 02:02 AM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE
Also, notice a huge (and I mean Huge) crater-like structure at the lower right corner of that image, with barely one quarter of it visible. It's so huge that it would be unrecognizable at ground level...


That Huge Crater is, incidentally, the only feature in the whole area to show up on my by now quite antiquated (1979) paper maps of Mars -- where it appears as a tiny, nameless dimple. Thanks for reminding me just how huge Mars actually is, and how little of we really know, up close, after all these years rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MizarKey
post Jan 12 2005, 07:01 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 295
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Central California
Member No.: 45



QUOTE (Pando @ Jan 11 2005, 04:04 PM)
QUOTE
I hope they decide to take Oppy to one of the hill like protrusions toward the east end of the ellipse


I'm not sure what hills you are referring to, but there seems to be two eroded *craters* at the end (or slightly below) the right end of the landing ellipse. The Victoria Crater appears to be relatively young compared to these though, and is therefore a much more interesting science target.

Also, notice a huge (and I mean Huge) crater-like structure at the lower right corner of that image, with barely one quarter of it visible. It's so huge that it would be unrecognizable at ground level...

I was wondering if those were craters or hills...

And Doug, shhhhush, stop mentioning 'end of mission'...Oppy will go on forever!

Eric P / MizarKey


--------------------
Eric P / MizarKey
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
YesRushGen
post Jan 12 2005, 09:31 PM
Post #24


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 26-May 04
Member No.: 77



QUOTE (MizarKey @ Jan 12 2005, 07:01 PM)
...Oppy will go on forever!

Eric P / MizarKey

Indeed!

Hey guys, I know what I'm about to suggest is complete and absolute crazy talk, but check out this map of all Mars Landing sites (failed and sucessful) http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/marsprobemap.html

Wouldn't it be neat if Oppy could travel to the site of the failed Mars 6 lander? It's in the same general vicinity, probably several hundred km away. (Not sure of the map's scale) At the very least, if Oppy survives after Victoria, it would be a direction to drive.

If they plowed ahead at 100m/sol, that's 10 sols for 1km or 1000sols for 100km. Like I said, absolute crazy talk. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David
post Jan 13 2005, 12:53 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE
Wouldn't it be neat if Oppy could travel to the site of the failed Mars 6 lander? It's in the same general vicinity, probably several hundred km away. (Not sure of the map's scale) At the very least, if Oppy survives after Victoria, it would be a direction to drive.
If they plowed ahead at 100m/sol, that's 10 sols for 1km or 1000sols for 100km. Like I said, absolute crazy talk.


The distance is on the order of 1500 km, so at the speed you suggest it would take oh, about 40 years to get there. Also the intermediate terrain is rough and heavily cratered, and looks particularly nasty close to the (assumed) Mars 6 crash site. Moreover we would need to figure out exactly where the Mars 6 actually was, but I suppose 40 years is enough to determine that. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jan 13 2005, 01:19 AM
Post #26


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



It would be more interesting to see the Mars-3 lander and figure out exactly what did happen to it after a half minute of transmitting. As for Mars-6, it has the distinction of being the first to send back data from inside the Martian atmosphere (basically a temperature and pressure profile). Also, spurious signals from it led people to believe the Martian atmosphere contained a boat load of Argon.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Jan 20 2005, 12:20 AM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



Looks like work on the meteorite is finished.
Are we go for Vostok now??



--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Jan 20 2005, 12:27 AM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 471
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



QUOTE (dot.dk @ Jan 20 2005, 12:20 AM)
Looks like work on the meteorite is finished.
Are we go for Vostok now??


The main part of the heatshield is close behind Oppy again. I wonder if there are still some investigations to be done here.

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...EEP1311R0M1.JPG


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Jan 20 2005, 12:45 AM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



We need an updated future SOL plan from Pando biggrin.gif


--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Jan 20 2005, 02:36 AM
Post #30


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



Come on, Oppy, Smile for the thermal blanket - cheese!

I vote "self portrait" in the reflective covering - please!!!!!


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:55 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.