What Will This Mission Accomplish Others Won't? |
What Will This Mission Accomplish Others Won't? |
Jan 10 2005, 09:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 108 Joined: 8-June 04 Member No.: 80 |
I heard this mission has an extremely high-resolution camera, but don't MGS and Mars Express as well? I know it also has some kind of radar sounder to search for water beneath the surface, but doesn't Mars Express have something like that too? The only instrument I found that hasn't been flown before is one for measuring climate that I think was lost on the Mars Climate Orbiter.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 12 2005, 09:01 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 686 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 11 2005, 09:02 AM) The MEX high res issue is due to calibration problems - or so Bruce tells me. I'm not sure I buy that - and I'm not sure he does either. I have this book about the 2004 mars missions ( MER, MEX, beagle-2 ): http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3440...2222784-3018130 And on page 70 is the HIGH RESOLUTION companion to this MEX Olympus Mons picture: http://search.esa.int/queryIG.html?col=mmg...&nh=1&lk=3&rf=3 The caption says it has a resolution of 2.3 meters. If it really IS taken by MEX the calibration excuse is nonsense. The image looks fine. The book was published back in april, so ESA had a lot of time to 'calibrate' I would say... It's funny, because the author of this book himself complains about ESA's enormous lack of PR compared to the MER mission. |
|
|
|
pioneer What Will This Mission Accomplish Others Won't? Jan 10 2005, 09:05 PM
djellison Well - yes - MGS and MEX have high res cameras - 1... Jan 10 2005, 09:28 PM
Sunspot ......still wondering what happened to the high re... Jan 11 2005, 12:28 AM
djellison QUOTE (Sunspot @ Jan 11 2005, 12:28 AM)......... Jan 11 2005, 09:02 AM
lyford QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 11 2005, 01:02 AM)QUOT... Jan 11 2005, 04:42 PM
djellison The Marsis deployment is scheduled for March iirc
... Jan 11 2005, 06:01 PM
djellison Well - two obvious points.
-That image is colour... Jan 12 2005, 09:49 AM
OWW QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 12 2005, 09:49 AM)-Tha... Jan 12 2005, 10:41 AM
djellison Do you have a scanner
Doug Jan 12 2005, 12:20 PM
OWW No I don't have a scanner. But I can give you ... Jan 12 2005, 01:33 PM
djellison Maybe it's just printed small
Doug Jan 12 2005, 02:15 PM
OWW QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 12 2005, 02:15 PM)Mayb... Jan 12 2005, 02:24 PM
djellison Well - maybe they are having calibration problems ... Jan 12 2005, 02:25 PM
MizarKey QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 12 2005, 06:25 AM)Well... Jan 12 2005, 06:55 PM
Decepticon I'm looking forward to seeing the other Lander... Jan 20 2005, 02:09 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 20 2005, 02:09 AM)I... Mar 11 2005, 04:01 AM
tedstryk Actually, we already have good locations for Vikin... Mar 11 2005, 04:29 AM
djellison MRO's swath width is ENORMOUS!
6km widt... Mar 11 2005, 07:47 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 05:01 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|