Kraken Mare through polarisers, Cassini looks for lake shine |
![]() ![]() |
Kraken Mare through polarisers, Cassini looks for lake shine |
Mar 29 2009, 08:56 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
The latest 'looking ahead' gives a nice description of the pi-transfer, introducing the curious concept of a 'rev' that is only half a revolution. It also contains this sentence:
"With Kraken Mare near the field of view, scientists can also use this effort to see how using polarization filters affects the appearance of large bodies of liquid methane on Titan." Titan followers here may remember why I'm excited about that. http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/uploads...78901_thumb.jpg |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2009, 03:16 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Any news on this?
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 11:01 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Is it finally time for a third post in this thread?
If I'm not mistaken this image is one of a pair taken with polarisers at 0 and 90 degrees: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...3/W00059373.jpg I suspect that Kraken Mare is marginally visible between 4 and 5 o'clock in this view. Now the question is: how are the filters oriented with respect to the picture frame? If they're horizontal and vertical that would put the lake at about 45 degrees to both. If I'm way off with all this somebody please tell me quick! |
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 11:27 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13269 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
If our duck-pond revelation in another thread is true - then a specular reflection is going to be TINY and thus probably unresolvable.
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 11:42 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I agree, probably, but we won't know for sure without giving it a proper try. I'm not saying either that this was that attempt. Kraken Mare (if seen at all) is way too close to the limb there. BTW Doug, can you answer the question about Cassini's polariser orientations w.r.t. picture frame?
It's just the first time I've noticed a pair of images taken with 90 degree polarisers that may include some wet stuff. Forgive me for getting a little excited. |
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 11:47 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13269 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 12:34 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 981 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
Page 3 here might be of use for the IRP90 and IRP0 filters (which are the ones that are used http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/raw/rawi...?imageID=200189 ):
http://pds-rings.seti.org/cassini/iss/COIS....8.2_wac_fm.pdf edit: so I guess horizontal and vertical indeed. |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 06:31 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Now there's an interesting thing. The latest distant Titan shots include a set of three with polarisers at 0, 60 and120 degrees. This was probably atmospheric study (is that a cloud streak near the centre?) but Kraken Mare was in view just a couple of days ago, so I'm wondering - well you know what I'm wondering.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...0/N00155223.jpg |
|
|
|
Dec 21 2010, 03:09 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
The thread from the dead returns! Three more today: 0, 60 and 120, and I think that's Kraken Mare at lower left. I can't see any obvious differences (but a three way rotating blink would be nice if any image hand fancies the job).
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...5/N00165578.jpg |
|
|
|
Dec 21 2010, 05:11 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2822 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Well, keep in mind that Kraken Mare is in the muck in these views, and that might limit any differences due to the use of different polarizers.
Good though to see the public image site get the real time stream, I wish we did too... -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Dec 22 2010, 11:01 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 483 Joined: 1-April 08 From: Minnesota ! Member No.: 4081 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 11:37 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Well, here we go again, and this time I think there may be a detectable effect. The images in question are N00172716 (P0 and CB2), N00172717 (P60 and CB2) and N001728 (P120 and CB2). It's my impression that the lake looks slightly darker, and hence more visible, in the P0 image than in the other two. Of course I have no idea whether the polarisation, if present, is happening at the lake suface or higher in the atmosphere.
Anyhow, I have a request which I hope will interest somebody with the necessary image processing skills. I would like to see ratio images with N00172716 and either, or each, of the other two. |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 11:18 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2940 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Another set of three using polarisers with the lake in frame today. Again differences are not immediately obvious but somebody might like to take a closer look and maybe make a blink comparison.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/raw/rawi...?imageID=256691 http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/raw/rawi...?imageID=256690 http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/raw/rawi...?imageID=256689 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 06:23 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|