IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

(Over-) crowded L2 point?
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Apr 9 2009, 11:36 AM
Post #1





Guests






The Lagrange points (there are 5 for any restricted three-body problem) are positions where a satellite/spacecraft or even small celestial body (asteroid) can theoretically be stationary relative to two larger objects (such as Sun and the Earth-Moon system). Therefore the Sun-Earth L2 point was chosen for several observatories as it faces away from the Sun and the Earth-Moon system. It sits at a distance of 1.5 million kilometers.
L2 based missions include: WMAP, Planck, Herschel, JWST, PLATO, etc…
The above short list of missions (to be) placed at the L2 point immediately points out it might get crowded out there. We all know there’s a lot of space out there but these spacecraft are situated in stable periodic orbits around the L2 point itself.
So what’s the risk on interference or even collisions of L2 based observatories?
Moreover, the problem gets worse in time as these spacecraft become inoperative and start to buildup as “space junk” at L2…
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
dmuller
post Sep 24 2010, 11:54 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



www.dmuller.net/planck gives the current distance between Planck and Herschel. Currently 390,000km ... that's like from the Earth to the Moon, so plenty of space to share.
EDIT: BTW, the Planck orbit is somewhere in the magnitude of 800,000km IIRC


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:29 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.