IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Taking Bets, Where will it land?
volcanopele
post Jan 12 2005, 09:45 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



With just a couple more days to go until Huygens reaches Titan, I'd thought I would gauge your thoughts on what kind of terrain you think Huygens will land in. My guess would be cryovolcanic plains covered in goo.

Edit: I meant you, not they. What do YOU think Huygens will land in?


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 26)
OWW
post Jan 12 2005, 09:53 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



What will it look like? Here is an art contest of the planetary society:
http://planetary.org/saturn/artcontest.html

Personally I think this one is closest to my imagination:
http://planetary.org/saturn/contest/artur_rataj.html

Namely, a almost featureless plain of icy fluff. Maybe with some dark splotches here and there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Jan 12 2005, 09:57 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



I'm thinking the terrain will be mostly covered with tholin. Underneath, the surface would look kind of like Ganymede with grooves. We might see some areas with ice sticking out in high places along with a small lake or two of methane or ethane.

The lighting would be a little dark, but not so dark the lamp would be needed to take visible light pictures.

During its descent, Huygens will also encounter some fairly strong winds.

It will probably land on a solid surface covered with tholin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 12 2005, 10:32 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Here are my favorites, both in terms of accuracy {IMHO} and my personal taste in art. For space art, I don't like impressionism, post-modern, or other "junk" art forms.

http://planetary.org/saturn/contest/rodrigo_belote.html
http://planetary.org/saturn/contest/bryce_jacobs.html biggrin.gif
http://planetary.org/saturn/contest/frank_hettick.html

Why do people insist on showing Saturn's rings????


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Jan 12 2005, 11:33 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



Volcano, that first picture is NOT very accurate... Titan is in the same plane as the rings so you can never see the rings at such an angle. ( But hey, it's Art right? laugh.gif )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 12 2005, 11:38 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (ObsessedWithWorlds @ Jan 12 2005, 04:33 PM)
Volcano, that first picture is NOT very accurate... Titan is in the same plane as the rings so you can never see the rings at such an angle. ( But hey, it's Art right? laugh.gif )

I agree. Thus my complaint in my post biggrin.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jan 12 2005, 11:44 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 12 2005, 10:32 PM)
Why do people insist on showing Saturn's rings????

Because without the rings it just doesn't look like Saturn.
I understand that Saturn's rings would be edge-on and not visible but isn't Saturn below the horizon from Huygen's landing site?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 12 2005, 11:47 PM
Post #8


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I say something quite hard and icey - but with regions of sludge locally

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 12 2005, 11:49 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (alan @ Jan 12 2005, 04:44 PM)
QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 12 2005, 10:32 PM)

Why do people insist on showing Saturn's rings????

Because without the rings it just doesn't look like Saturn.
I understand that Saturn's rings would be edge-on and not visible but isn't Saturn below the horizon from Huygen's landing site?

LOL!!!!! Yep, it would be below the horizon. The Huygens landing site is almost smack-dab in the middle of the anti-Saturnian hemisphere biggrin.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 13 2005, 01:52 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Woohoo!!! I got a DISR team member to "adopt" me for a day so I can look at DISR images on Friday. Of course I am supposed to get this person soda and coffee when they need it, but otherwise biggrin.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Jan 13 2005, 02:35 AM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



Whoa, are you ever a lucky guy!!!!

There's nothing like being in the room when the good stuff comes down. Closest I ever got was when I was a teenager, working as an intern at the Air & Space Museum in Washington, DC. I was watching one of the Apollo 16 moonwalks on a small black and white TV in the museum library when Michael Collins, Apollo XI CMP and then-director of the museum, came in. He sat down and watched it with me for about half an hour. It was so great to be able to ask him just about any question I could think of about the Moon and the mission!


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gpurcell
post Jan 13 2005, 06:18 AM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 127



My predictions:

Only the final set of images will show detail of landforms...the earlier sets will be little but haze.

Icy surface with some rocks sticking out. No liquid.

Lander will fail on contact with ground.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Jan 13 2005, 09:03 AM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



QUOTE (gpurcell @ Jan 13 2005, 06:18 AM)
Only the final set of images will show detail of landforms...the earlier sets will be little but haze.
Icy surface with some rocks sticking out. No liquid.
Lander will fail on contact with ground.

That's the spirit...! dry.gif

I think it should be the other way around. Only the high altitude images will show detail and the final set wil show a smooth surface without details. Much like a snowcovered landscape.
As for the landing, I doubt it will be a solid CLUNK. After billions of years of organic goo blowing around there must be SOME layer of soft stuff on the surface.
Contact lost after touchdown? Maybe, but only because it sinks in the dust... smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 13 2005, 09:07 AM
Post #14


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



After billions of years of organic goo ( well, people and spiders and bacteria and fish and plankton and penguins and rhinos and turtles and birds and things ) - you could say the same about earth - yet land on the Derbyshire Dales and it'd be a hard clunk smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Jan 13 2005, 09:26 AM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 13 2005, 09:07 AM)
After billions of years of organic goo ( well, people and spiders and bacteria and fish and plankton and penguins and rhinos and turtles and birds and things ) - you could say the same about earth - yet land on the Derbyshire Dales and it'd be a hard clunk smile.gif

Point taken. But then the Earth didn't have a global smog layer worse than the most polluted city for over 4 billion years... cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
YesRushGen
post Jan 13 2005, 01:25 PM
Post #16


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 26-May 04
Member No.: 77



I predict landing on a solid surface, and that Cassini will record Huygen's signal until it disappears over the horizon. cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Jan 13 2005, 02:11 PM
Post #17


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



my guess is a fluffy, flat surface. I hope huygens will survive impact but I don't think so.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jan 13 2005, 02:19 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



I think that Titan & Triton will be very close.

I just think that Titan my have some type of Gyser type events going.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Jan 13 2005, 02:50 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
Point taken. But then the Earth didn't have a global smog layer worse than the most polluted city for over 4 billion years...


But Titan does not have an agressive bipolar solvent in abundance nor is it at a temperature of 273 degK, which promotes weathering, dissolution and erosion.

I'm as imaginative as the next primate but I can't comprehend what we'll see. I'd side with a cloudy Triton in the large-scale, but don't have a clue about the surface details.

We'll see tomorrow....

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Jan 13 2005, 03:26 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jan 13 2005, 02:50 PM)
But Titan does not have an agressive bipolar solvent in abundance nor is it at a temperature of 273 degK, which promotes weathering, dissolution and erosion.

No watererosion is another argument in favor of a slushcovered surface. When the smoggy stuff finally settles out of the sky it will not move again for a Long Time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DEChengst
post Jan 13 2005, 05:09 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 270
Joined: 29-December 04
From: NLA0:
Member No.: 133



I predict it will find a monolith. Ofcourse that's too shocking to release to the world, so ESA and NASA will declare the probe lost.


--------------------
PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jan 13 2005, 08:16 PM
Post #22


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



What would be so shocking? Unexpected, yes, but shocking?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Jan 13 2005, 08:28 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



It's shocking in the sense that the monolith somehow transported itself from its commonly known present location, Iapetus... biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 13 2005, 09:55 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (ObsessedWithWorlds @ Jan 13 2005, 08:26 AM)
QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jan 13 2005, 02:50 PM)
But Titan does not have an agressive bipolar solvent in abundance nor is it at a temperature of 273 degK, which promotes weathering, dissolution and erosion.

No watererosion is another argument in favor of a slushcovered surface. When the smoggy stuff finally settles out of the sky it will not move again for a Long Time.

I suspect that there is a layer a few inches thick of gunk overlying my volcanic plains


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 13 2005, 11:05 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



obviously we now have the "Battleship" style lottery board, but I my hope is that Huygens lands very close to a bright/dark boundary, between the dark terrain and the intermediate albedo "islands". then we cna get a good idea on what the "islands" look like and what the dark terrain looks like in one shot. At least in the 3 km altitude panorama.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jan 13 2005, 11:22 PM
Post #26





Guests






With large radio telescopes on Earth listening for Huygens signal during the decent, are we likely to get an indication from them before Cassini on how things have gone with the mission?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NorbertGiesinger
post Jan 14 2005, 12:26 AM
Post #27


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 3-November 04
Member No.: 106



YES at 10:45 or 11:08 GMT up to the minute detection by VLBI on the progress of descent is planned (ESA TV)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:46 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.