Apollo Sites from LRO |
![]() ![]() |
Apollo Sites from LRO |
Jul 17 2009, 05:06 PM
Post
#16
|
||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 513 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
LRO view of Apollo 15 compared to mosaic made from ascent footage - the white arrow points to a piece of the descent stage insulation that was blown off during liftoff.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Jul 17 2009, 05:08 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 24-June 09 Member No.: 4837 |
So far it seems that the Apollo 14 Landing site shot has got the greatest resolution, aren't the MET tracks the ones visible?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:10 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13274 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
A combination of shuffling astronauts and dragged met.
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:11 PM
Post
#19
|
||
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4587 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Now you can zoomify the whole images at the LROC site - here's the Apollo 17 Station 6 boulder:
(Zoomify uses a compressed image so there are artifacts) Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
||
Jul 17 2009, 05:11 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 3-June 08 From: McLean, VA Member No.: 4177 |
YeeHAHHH!!
Great stuff! I make out the '11 site LM at about 200 pixels, some of the others, slightly less. You can clearly see the nozzle shadow going to the bulk of the stage with the plume deflectors very light. I'm trying to convince myself I see the flag - more to study. And they almost got all the sites! Really look forward to the best stuff to come - oh, yah... and all the new places to land and explore. |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:16 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4587 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
The north end of the Apollo 11 image came within about 6 km of the Surveyor 5 site - so close...
(PS - how am I supposed to get any work done?) Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:20 PM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 513 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:22 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 12-April 06 Member No.: 738 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:38 PM
Post
#24
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 513 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:43 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 05:57 PM
Post
#26
|
||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 513 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
Apollo 16 ascent footage frame / LRO comparison:
Curiously, the LRV itself isn't visible, although the shadow it casts towards the east certainly is. -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Jul 17 2009, 05:57 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 3-June 08 From: McLean, VA Member No.: 4177 |
QUOTE (FordPrefect) I know this is a wild guess for the Apollo 14 image, but could this be the... Flag shadow?Or maybe the big S-band deployable antenna... |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 06:05 PM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1061 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
Wow. LRO has really come out of the gate hitting on all cylinders. Very evocative shots.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 06:05 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 24-June 09 Member No.: 4837 |
QUOTE Or maybe the big S-band deployable antenna... I would go for the antenna too, even though it wouldn't cast a so distinct shadow... Do you think the nylon of the flag would survive 40 years up there? -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 06:06 PM
Post
#30
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 513 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 06:37 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|