IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

The longitudinal stripes south of Senkyo
ngunn
post Aug 24 2009, 07:47 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



The nearly longitudinal large scale streaks east of Tsegihi have been interpreted as either parallel mountain chains or as surface deposits of some kind superimposed on the topography. As I write this we are sandwiched between two significant events in the exploration of these features, the unfortunate loss of the T60 SAR data and the hoped-for T61 VIMS imaging. Below are a few tentative thoughts that I hope may prompt some discussion.

One look at the map of Titan and it’s clear that this area looks odd. The system of parallel stripes intersects the more typical surface markings formed by the frayed southern margin of the Senkyo sand sea at an angle of about 60 degrees. Furthermore those markings, formed by an active dune system, look fresher and more distinct than the strange longitudinal stripes. This leads to suggestion one:

1/ The stripes are older surface markings exposed by the net removal of newer sediments, palimpsests from an earlier era. In support of this idea I note that the area is in the lee of Tsegihi which presently functions as an effective barrier to sand transport. Farther north where the eastward flow of sand continues relatively unimpeded into Senkyo the longitudinal stripes are not seen. Suggestion one could be tested by examining the interdune spaces in the thinner parts of Senkyo to see if continuations of the stripes can be followed beneath the modern sands.
Why might albedo markings laid down in an earlier era be so differently oriented? This leads (though far from inevitably) to suggestion two:

2/ The stripes formed when their orientation with respect to Titan’s equator was very different from now.

From an earlier forum discussion it emerged that there was no clear evidence either for or against large scale reorientations of Titan’s crust in the past. Could it be that we have been looking at part of that evidence all this time? Of course a lot more would be required to make a serious case, so it's not too late for a bit of speculation. Total refutation is always welcome!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
titanicrivers
post Sep 15 2009, 11:54 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 718
Joined: 1-April 08
From: Minnesota !
Member No.: 4081



QUOTE (ngunn @ Aug 24 2009, 02:47 PM) *
The nearly longitudinal large scale streaks east of Tsegihi have been interpreted as either parallel mountain chains or as surface deposits of some kind superimposed on the topography. As I write this we are sandwiched between two significant events in the exploration of these features, the unfortunate loss of the T60 SAR data and the hoped-for T61 VIMS imaging.


The paper https://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/324/5929/921 you mentioned in post #5 of the Non-targeted flyby of Sept. 22, 2009 topic may have some relevance in this discussion. The paper shows an interesting ellipsoidal Titan shape elevation map (although the paper downplays correlation of the 4th harmonic regional Titan ellipsoidal shapes/elevation map and surface features other than the poles and Xanadu), which portrays a relatively higher surface plot in the region south of SENKYO where VIMS data suggests elevated terrain. (see below image).
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:14 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.