IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Titan Express?, interesting proposal from Ralph Lorenz
ngunn
post Aug 25 2009, 10:47 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



With thanks to Van Kane at futureplanets for links to the very interesting white papers for the next decadal survey, here is one that caught my eye:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=...Wl6DEjXiZwrRDZg

Small but capable landers with enough power to talk directly to earth can be hurled into Titan's obliging atmosphere at interplanetary velocities and land safely without parachutes.

QUOTE:

Mission Architecture

A network mission could likely (depending on the ASRG/RTG provision) fit within the New Frontiers
budget envelope, in that 4 small landers could be delivered directly to Titan on a simple carrier from
interplanetary approach (somewhat reminiscent of the Pioneer Venus probes). The small semi-hard
landers would not need parachutes, legs nor sampling systems, and thus could be relatively simple and
inexpensive. In the Entry-Descent-and-Landing (EDL) context, a Titan network mission is considerably
easier than a corresponding Mars mission.

It will be recalled that the 1.3m diameter, 200kg Huygens probe, with a 1.3m parachute, hit the ground at
5 m/s and was unaffected by the 15g impact. A 10-50kg small station, with a Huygens-like 5cm foam
insulation layer, will encounter similar or lower impact speeds and loads without a parachute. The stations
might be simple DS-2 or Huygens-like capsules, or perhaps with simple self-righting petals like the
Russian Luna-9 or the Mars Pathfinder.

Communication, of course, would be direct-to-Earth. The key science goals can be met with modest
bandwidth (a Megabit per Titan day, or ~1 bps, is ample over year-long periods), compatible with low- or
medium-gain transmission to the DSN, especially if the bandwidth is leveraged by intelligent data
prioritization on the landers such as event-triggered sampling and data compression.

UNQUOTE

I have a queston regarding the range of arrival speed for which this could be done. Presumably when a very small payload is involved it is posible to send it on a much faster trajectory from Earth to its target than could be done for the likes of Cassini, should that be deemed worthwhile. I am wondering if Titan's atmosphere has an absolute maximum safe arrival speed?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_Enceladus75_*
post Aug 27 2009, 02:15 AM
Post #2





Guests






This looks like a great and very workable proposal. But isn't Venus's atmosphere orders of magnitude thicker than Titan's, 90 atmpspheres a the surface? Would Titan's much thinner atmosphere really be able to slow down small unparachuted probes sufficiently enough to land intact?

If a network of probes is to be sent - I presume a major target would be the Northern Polar lake region and the possible cryovolcanic feature.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Aug 27 2009, 03:28 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1599
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (Enceladus75 @ Aug 26 2009, 09:15 PM) *
This looks like a great and very workable proposal. But isn't Venus's atmosphere orders of magnitude thicker than Titan's,


And Titan's mass is an order of magnitude lower than Venus's. The acceleration due to gravity is probably a bigger deal than the deceleration provided by the atmosphere.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Aug 27 2009, 04:20 AM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Aug 26 2009, 10:28 PM) *
And Titan's mass is an order of magnitude lower than Venus's. The acceleration due to gravity is probably a bigger deal than the deceleration provided by the atmosphere.


Pressure (column mass) is what makes deceleration possible, but it is the scale height that makes
it easy. Titan comes 2nd place after Venus on the first, but is a clear winner on the 2nd factor.

P/g = column mass. On Titan this is 100,000 kg/m2
Whereas the column mass of a 50kg, 0.5 m2 probe would be only 10, so plenty of atmosphere to decelerate
small probes (think of sharing the momentum between the vehicle and the column of air it cookie-cutters out.)
For Mars at 6mb, the column mass of the atmosphere is only about the 10 kg/m2 so Mars is
marginal.

The scale height is what determines the size of the entry corridor, and for Titan that corridor is
very wide, so the guidance requirements for safe entry are very modest. (Or equivalently, lowers
the peak load - it spreads the deceleration over a longer distance/longer time)

So Venus could decelerate a more massive space vehicle than Titan could, but you'd need to deliver
it more accurately, and it would see much higher loads.

Arrival velocity for Titan is really determined by the interplanetary trajectory - acceleration by
Titan gravity doesnt add much ( Ventry^2 = Varrival^2 + Vescape^2) Vesc for TItan is only
2.5 km/s or so.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Holder of the Tw...
post Aug 27 2009, 02:14 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 544
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Oklahoma
Member No.: 557



QUOTE (rlorenz @ Aug 26 2009, 10:20 PM) *
The scale height is what determines the size of the entry corridor...


Good discussion and useful data, but I think Enceladus75 and stevesliva were discussing the parachuting/landing phase rather than entry.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 12:27 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.