My Assistant
Unmanned landing sites from LRO, Surveyors, Lunas, Lunakhods and impact craters from hardware impacts |
Sep 7 2009, 07:51 PM
Post
#101
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I figured it was time to begin a thread like this, especially since some of us may still be looking for the Surveyor III retro motor casing (assuming the bright dot to the north of the landing site isn't it).
We ought to be seeing some of the other Surveyors fairly soon, I would think. We know most of their locations pretty accurately. Again, I think there is a lot to be gained, both from scientific and engineering standpoints, from detailed imaging of the Surveyor VII landing site, just to mention one. And I really want to see how visible the Lunakhod tracks are as opposed to the MET and LRV tracks. So... until we begin to see images of other unmanned hardware (or the craters caused by same), we could always discuss comparisons of Surveyor III surface imagery to the new LROC images of its landing site here. I'm especially taken by how you can resolve many of the blocks in Block Crater in the LROC image, which gives you a good feel for the explosive nature of the ejecta and roughly where in the ejecta plume a given block might have come from. Might be interesting/useful to apply this information to the samples taken at that location. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
dvandorn Unmanned landing sites from LRO Sep 7 2009, 07:51 PM
Phil Stooke This is Surveyor 3 in the most recent released ima... Apr 12 2010, 11:59 AM
Astro0 Great work as always Phil.
Thought I'd try a ... Apr 13 2010, 11:27 AM
PDP8E Here is a tortured enhancement of LUNOKHOD 2 made... May 27 2010, 01:56 AM
Phil Stooke Interesting!
By the way, only a couple of wee... May 27 2010, 01:18 PM
Phil Stooke This is a possible candidate for the Chang-e-1 imp... May 31 2010, 03:04 AM
Phil Stooke Another possible impact crater... this might be SM... Jun 1 2010, 01:00 AM
Phil Stooke The new release is out... and to celebrate it, her... Jun 23 2010, 09:05 PM
Phil Stooke ... and the nearby 'playa' which was the a... Jun 23 2010, 09:10 PM
Phil Stooke This is Surveyor 7 from the raw image instead of t... Jun 24 2010, 12:35 PM
tedstryk I have waited to see this for so long. WOW! Jun 24 2010, 02:34 PM
Phil Stooke
This is an extreme enlargement of the area aroun... Jun 24 2010, 03:11 PM
kenny How extremely nice ... I am just looking at your ... Jun 27 2010, 10:29 AM
Phil Stooke Thanks, Kenny!
Phil Jun 27 2010, 11:10 AM
antipode Wow! Slightly OT, but is that a 'pond... Jun 27 2010, 11:03 PM
Phil Stooke Yes, it's one of many ponds of impact melt aro... Jun 28 2010, 12:30 AM
Phil Stooke Here's a nice recently released LROC image of ... Oct 14 2010, 03:57 PM
gndonald Supposedly the LRO has imaged the Lunar 23 & 2... Mar 31 2012, 03:05 PM
TheAnt QUOTE (gndonald @ Mar 31 2012, 04:05 PM) ... Mar 31 2012, 04:08 PM
Decepticon Here. Cool!
http://www.spaceref.com/news/view... Mar 31 2012, 03:37 PM
Phil Stooke Luna 23 was an LPOD a few days ago. I have to say... Mar 31 2012, 04:31 PM
Paolo even before these images were released, the Lavoch... Mar 31 2012, 05:22 PM
Phil Stooke Interesting... but I never heard that stated befor... Apr 1 2012, 12:03 PM
Paolo Surveyor 7 - America's Last Lunar Unmanned Lan... Sep 7 2012, 07:08 PM
Paolo I have been reading the article "Declassifyin... Oct 13 2012, 08:36 AM
Geert QUOTE (Paolo @ Oct 13 2012, 04:36 PM) I s... Oct 14 2012, 02:13 AM
dvandorn I would still like to see if there is any sign of ... Oct 14 2012, 04:19 AM
remcook Interesting paper about Luna landers: http://www.s... Nov 9 2012, 01:26 PM
Phil Stooke This is a possible site for the Apollo 14 LM ascen... Apr 8 2013, 06:10 PM
jasonjason The most interesting object I found in my searches... May 4 2013, 02:41 AM
Geert QUOTE (jasonjason @ May 4 2013, 10:41 AM)... May 4 2013, 10:01 AM
jasonjason Thanks for the input Geert,
I do have the NACS wi... May 4 2013, 11:37 AM
jasonjason Here are the NAC strips with the object.
I have a... May 4 2013, 11:53 AM
Phil Stooke This is a very interesting object, but of course t... May 4 2013, 01:18 PM
tolis Apart from the successful Luna 9 & 13, Lunas 7... May 4 2013, 05:51 PM
Phil Stooke This is an image I sent to Jason which shows more ... May 4 2013, 10:23 PM
Phil Stooke This is the Surveyor 1 site imaged by LROC - the i... Oct 16 2013, 02:09 AM
kenny I've just noticed this interesting post. Th... Jan 29 2014, 10:09 AM
Paolo not a landing site but... LRO has imaged LADEE zoo... Jan 29 2014, 09:05 PM
Tom Dahl RE: LRO imaging LADEE -- amazing! Reading the ... Jan 30 2014, 03:07 PM
Hungry4info That's immensely impressive that they were abl... Jan 30 2014, 07:35 PM
charborob New LROC images of Chang-e 3's landing site. Mar 4 2014, 06:18 PM
Phil Stooke Excellent! Looking carefully at a blow-up of ... Mar 4 2014, 07:31 PM
Phil Stooke Here are two LROC images of lunar hardware... poss... Jul 24 2015, 10:49 PM
dvandorn Looks like Surveyor V's retro-rocket (if you h... Jul 25 2015, 12:50 AM
Phil Stooke It was in the Apollo sites thread:
http://www.unm... Jul 25 2015, 02:04 AM
dvandorn Thanks, Phil! Yeah, that was the thing I saw ... Jul 25 2015, 03:07 AM
Phil Stooke Doug, usually there is very little to see in the l... Jul 25 2015, 05:30 AM
Phil Stooke A follow-up on Surveyor 3.
At left, an LROC ima... Sep 3 2015, 07:09 PM
nprev That's a really cool find! IIRC the impact... Sep 4 2015, 04:33 AM
charborob Phil, can you give an estimate of the size of that... Sep 4 2015, 10:38 AM
Ian R Wow! I wonder if this area was covered by Apol... Sep 4 2015, 01:02 PM
Phil Stooke The crater is only about 2 m across. There are no... Sep 4 2015, 02:14 PM
dvandorn Excellent find, Phil! That's exactly the ... Sep 5 2015, 12:23 AM
Phil Stooke I should say that that particular image is one of ... Sep 5 2015, 03:19 AM
Ian R I have an exciting addendum to Phil's Surveyor... Sep 29 2015, 09:29 PM
Phil Stooke OK, it's time to prepare LPSC abstracts for ne... Nov 27 2015, 09:43 PM
dvandorn Oh, yeah -- it looks like you've definitely na... Nov 28 2015, 01:23 AM
Phil Stooke On a related note - not a landing site exactly - n... Nov 30 2015, 01:56 AM
Phil Stooke From this link:
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/89... Dec 14 2015, 06:40 PM
Phil Stooke And here is a locator image if you want to find it... Dec 15 2015, 11:51 PM
Phil Stooke I have been experimenting with making improved ima... Jun 22 2016, 08:15 PM
Phil Stooke continuing the theme of improving LRO NAC images b... Jul 26 2016, 09:24 PM
Phil Stooke I had someone ask me about Surveyor 4 today, and t... Mar 27 2018, 11:55 PM
nprev Looks compelling. Is it well within the intended l... Mar 28 2018, 12:22 AM
Phil Stooke Well within the ellipse which was about 30 km acro... Mar 28 2018, 02:11 AM
nprev Hmm. Sounds like a #2 splat is more probable, then... Mar 28 2018, 03:51 AM
Explorer1 It would be so cool if some of those private compa... Mar 28 2018, 12:32 PM
Phil Stooke There are probably more interesting targets! ... Mar 30 2018, 02:30 PM
jccwrt You could make the argument that these splats are ... Mar 30 2018, 05:29 PM
PDP8E I saw your post on Surveyor 4 and dug up my old ca... Mar 31 2018, 08:46 PM
kenny Going back a little, to the chat about LM impact i... Dec 8 2019, 11:37 AM
Liss I’d like a possibility to be checked that I... Feb 26 2020, 07:54 PM
Phil Stooke It's always interesting to see attempts to fin... Feb 27 2020, 01:02 AM
Phil Stooke OK, here is a comparison of the suggested features... Feb 27 2020, 01:54 AM
Liss QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 27 2020, 04:54 A... Feb 27 2020, 12:06 PM
Shan May be this is the elusive Luna9 we are looking fo... Oct 31 2020, 05:39 PM
Shan May be this is the elusive Luna9 we are looking fo... Oct 31 2020, 06:06 PM
Phil Stooke That's quite a good match to nearby features, ... Oct 31 2020, 06:31 PM
Shan QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Nov 1 2020, 12:01 AM... Nov 1 2020, 05:13 AM
Shan QUOTE (Shan @ Nov 1 2020, 10:43 AM) Sent ... Nov 4 2020, 01:56 AM
Phil Stooke The lander is tilted so that its top is pointing t... Nov 4 2020, 04:03 AM
Shan QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Nov 4 2020, 09:33 AM... Nov 26 2020, 11:06 AM
JRehling The process here reminds me to a fair extent of wh... Nov 26 2020, 07:33 PM
fredk I guess you're talking about plate solving - t... Nov 26 2020, 08:13 PM
Phil Stooke This problem is not really suitable for the kind o... Nov 26 2020, 09:40 PM
Shan QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Nov 27 2020, 03:10 A... Jul 28 2021, 06:28 PM
Shan I believe Luna9 will be easier to find as the hill... Feb 9 2021, 01:32 AM
Phil Stooke I think if an object hits the surface at 22 km/h i... Jul 29 2021, 04:18 AM
Shan QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 29 2021, 09:48 A... Jul 29 2021, 08:29 AM
Shan @Phil - Luna9 might have landed to further east of... Oct 16 2021, 03:09 AM
Shan @Phil
Whether this could be one of the Luna9... Jan 24 2022, 08:57 AM
Phil Stooke It is a nice candidate. The landing stage should ... Jan 24 2022, 09:50 PM
Shan QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jan 25 2022, 03:20 A... Jan 25 2022, 12:59 AM
Explorer1 Probably the best thread to post this (mods, pleas... Jan 25 2022, 02:48 AM
Phil Stooke Thanks for pointing that out! Another point o... Jan 25 2022, 08:15 AM
Phil Stooke Shan, that location is quite far east of where we ... Jan 26 2022, 07:33 AM
Shan QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jan 26 2022, 01:03 P... Jan 26 2022, 01:14 PM
Explorer1 Some more estimates in this article, including a m... Feb 4 2022, 08:35 PM
Phil Stooke Unexpected turn of events... it's not the DSCO... Feb 13 2022, 07:38 AM
Explorer1 Fascinating... I wonder where DSCOVR s upper stage... Feb 13 2022, 05:14 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 03:44 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|