Argon on the Moon? |
Argon on the Moon? |
Sep 23 2009, 05:19 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 15-September 09 Member No.: 4941 |
This is a personal theory, explained in the article. Time will tell if I am right or wrong.
http://www.moondaily.com/reports/Argon_On_The_Moon_999.html I don't know if argon deposits would be as useful as water, though. |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 12:54 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10229 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Well, if you can figure out how to use it for rocket fuel and life support...
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 01:02 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Maybe as a dilutant in the breathing mixture in place of nitrogen?
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 01:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
Norman Foster will need it when his construction crews are welding on the Moon.
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 05:01 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
This from the Wikipedia article is interesting:
"....argon can form clathrates with water when atoms of it are trapped in a lattice of the water molecules." It will be interesting to see if large amounts of both argon and water are found by LCROSS. |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 05:15 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Not sure if anyone has measaured argon narcosis at just one atmosphere, but since it's 2.3 times worse than nitrogen and some people seem to feel effects from nitrogen at less than three atmospheres, I'd guess that using argon instead of nitrogen would make the crew slightly stupider than normal.
An ion drive could use argon instead of xenon for fuel, of course, but it'd have even less thrust (athough better specific impulse). Seems like more of a curiosity than anything useful -- any time soon, anyway. Someone might find a cool use for it, but I don't see anything obvious that would obviously work. :-) --Greg |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 05:27 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Might be useful to explain how the volatiles got there. Isotope ratios might help tell if it got delivered from comets or was derived from internal radioactive decay.
-Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 05:57 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 06:16 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Question: Is there any practical way to determine Ar isotopic ratios remotely? Nothing springs to mind.
Also re applications: Argon's a very good thermal insulator, so it might be useful for that application in future lunar construction. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 06:22 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 06:45 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Yeah, but vacuum's TOO good in some ways; disposing of internally generated waste heat becomes a real problem. Argon's got some thermal inertia, so you can dissipate heat over the entire surface area of a container/structure instead of building an overly elaborate radiator system that has to work through structural penetrations.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 07:01 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Not sure if anyone has measaured argon narcosis at just one atmosphere, but since it's 2.3 times worse than nitrogen and some people seem to feel effects from nitrogen at less than three atmospheres, I'd guess that using argon instead of nitrogen would make the crew slightly stupider than normal. Interesting, though I don't find any mention of toxicity when looking around. For example this is from Wikipedia: Although argon is non-toxic, it does not satisfy the body's need for oxygen and is thus an asphyxiant. Argon is 25% more dense than air and is considered highly dangerous in closed areas. It is also difficult to detect because it is colorless, odorless, and tasteless. In confined spaces, it is known to result in death due to asphyxiation. And after all we breathe it all the time at 1 percent. Now that the question has cropped up I'm really curious to know one way or the other. |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 07:07 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Argon will sit heavily in your lungs if you breath in a lot of it in high concentrations. (At normal concentrations in air, it's not a problem).
Argon will make a nice inert blanket. Unlike nitrogen, air (i.e. oxygen) won't diffuse down through it. I've isolated very air-sensitive materials under an argon blanket in an open flask. Argon-filled balloons are kinda neat. They drop right to the floor. -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 07:44 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Unlike nitrogen, air (i.e. oxygen) won't diffuse down through it. Also interesting. You wouldn't want your Moon base chest-deep in neat argon or it would be dangerous to sit down! Also an undue concentration of oxygen near the ceiling would pose a fire risk. However maybe these problems would be less severe or even insignificant in low lunar gravity, especially with the air being constantly circulated to remove CO2. |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 07:49 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Interesting, though I don't find any mention of toxicity when looking around. Check out the sidebar on the right, listing the relative narcotic potency of different gases: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_narcosis If you had a 20% oxygen, 80% argon mix at one atmosphere, over time, that could cause some narcotic effect in some people. I couldn't find any evidence that anyone has actually tried this experiment, though. --Greg |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 02:50 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |