IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

67 Pages V  « < 30 31 32 33 34 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Extricating Spirit, Digging out from Troy
Keatah
post Dec 18 2009, 07:54 AM
Post #466


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 13-June 08
Member No.: 4206



QUOTE (PDP8E @ Dec 18 2009, 05:31 AM) *
This is one of the most singularly exciting and suspenseful missions of all time, and we all have a front row seat ... every day!

Cheers


That is true, I now sit down in the evening with a cup of hot cocoa in anticipation of reading this board and other sites. Like the ultimate soap opera!

My girlfriend was watching Aliens the other day and one of the soldiers in the APC on descent to the surface has an intermittent helmet camera, so he bangs his head on the bulkhead. GF says "hey! Maybe those mars guys can smash the arm into the rover!" Fix them electrical problems that seem to be coming and going. unsure.gif The moment was just so ridiculously funny!

Anyways, my armchair analysis says this is a mechanical problem; like a screw holding a grounding cable, or a cracked solder joint, or to a lesser extent and possibility a connector. I would imagine most connectors are double spring loaded to keep tension on the metal contacts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 18 2009, 09:13 AM
Post #467


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13250
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



We could play what-if till the cows come up.

Not using a wheel known to be dead, when further usage could endanger it's motor controller bed-fellows was the right thing to do at the time.

The only appropriate time to reverse that decision would be an in extremis situation, where the risk of damage to other components is worth the chance of finding the wheel working once more, which is what we have now. It may even transpire that the wheel has given is all it can already and may never turn again.

Trying to second guess a decision making process with 3 years of hindsight is, to be honest, silly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Dec 18 2009, 09:14 AM
Post #468


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4168
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



I checked the tracking web this morning and found the pattern of imaging sequences corresponding to another driving sol today i.e. sol 2118. Might it be?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Dec 18 2009, 09:22 AM
Post #469


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2563
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (PDP8E @ Dec 18 2009, 05:31 AM) *
...of course, the rover could be free in a few days and this message will be moot...
Cheers

It is of GREAT value to me helping understand the issue, thanks a lot.

And thanks also to Oersted for his uplifting "spirit"


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Dec 18 2009, 11:47 AM
Post #470


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4168
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Regarding today's drive: 1.5mm forward, 3mm down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Dec 18 2009, 03:42 PM
Post #471


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2741
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



The fhaz shows that the RF did move again today (2118):
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/fo...86P1235R0M1.JPG
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/fo...92P1214R0M1.JPG
So whatever happened at the end of the 2117 drive wasn't fatal. Perhaps an intermittent problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Dec 18 2009, 03:53 PM
Post #472


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 567
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



I'm not sure the rover gods are with us. Gain of RF in exchange for loss or RR is a poor deal. The RF wheel was sitting on the surface and could be dragges (or pushed) reasonably well with the other 5 wheels. The RR wheel is almost totally burried and will be most difficult to pull out of the sand--I think that is why we are sinking more than translating forward. Lets hope the RR comes back to life and we have 6 wheels for at least long enought to get free.


--------------------
Floyd
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Dec 18 2009, 03:59 PM
Post #473


Forum Contributor
***

Group: Members
Posts: 905
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Think positive...the RF digs in, grabs a nice rock, pulls Spirit out. Then we go mountain climbing again with all SIX wheels smile.gif.
wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif
wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Dec 18 2009, 04:06 PM
Post #474


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2741
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Or they try a different approach. Right now I think they're still checking the right wheels as much as trying to extract Spirit. If the electrical problem is understood, perhaps they'll be able to come up with a workaround that restores use of the RR. If not, pivoting forwards and to the right around the RR might be another approach to prevent it from holding us back.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Dec 18 2009, 04:50 PM
Post #475


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



Is the electrical problem possibly a buildup of static electricity on the rover chassis? After 5 years in the cold dry Martian climate, I can imagine a significant static charge may have built up. If so, is there any way to discharge it? In any event, anything we can learn about the electrical issue with Spirit may be useful if a similar issue later develops with Opportunity. That is one of the benefits of having two rovers. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Dec 18 2009, 04:58 PM
Post #476


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 966
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



I would think that the rover would be grounded to the surface, so I would guess "no".


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Dec 18 2009, 05:19 PM
Post #477


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



Grounding to the surface (through a light-weight mobility system) on Mars is difficult. A radioactive source that can create an ion path helps. My recollection from Pathfinder was that the Sojourner APXS was going to be used first if there was ever going to be contact between Sojourner and Pathfinder. That is also a concern (ie, a solvable problem, but something that needs attention) for future sample return operations. I'm not sure how conductive the IDD is vs. the mobility system, but I imagine the APXS and Mossbauer (plus contact plate) use has kept the static build up under control.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Dec 18 2009, 05:58 PM
Post #478


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Deimos @ Dec 18 2009, 09:19 AM) *
Grounding to the surface (through a light-weight mobility system) on Mars is difficult.

Definitely an understatement. AFAIK, there is no guaranteed ground path between the rover chassis and Mars. The rover has a number of small "lightning rods" that help to discharge it (see http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/moonandmars/mer.html ), but I could imagine that potential differences of a few volts could still be sustained. There may be a detailed description of the power bus grounding architecture of MER on the web someplace, but I don't have time to look for it right now. It doesn't sound to me like the current issue has much if anything to do with any potential difference between the rover and Mars anyway.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Dec 18 2009, 06:58 PM
Post #479


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2563
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Make sure you've checked Scott's blog here: http://twitter.com/marsroverdriver latest 5 or so entries are very interesting indeed.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Oersted_*
post Dec 19 2009, 02:18 PM
Post #480





Guests






QUOTE (climber @ Dec 18 2009, 07:58 PM) *
Make sure you've checked Scott's blog here: http://twitter.com/marsroverdriver latest 5 or so entries are very interesting indeed.


"# With RR failed(?) and RF working(???), Squyres has proposed that there's a law of conservation of working wheels on Spirit. ;-) #FreeSpirit 2:32 PM Dec 16th from web "
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

67 Pages V  « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 07:45 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.