Rosetta flyby of Asteroid Lutetia |
![]() ![]() |
Rosetta flyby of Asteroid Lutetia |
![]()
Post
#101
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 ![]() |
Just for a joke. Sorry NickF Continuing kidding, Death Star 1 should appear comparable to Lutetia, indeed (120 km is the "official" diameter)... ![]() -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#102
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 ![]() |
-------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#103
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 29-August 06 From: Columbia, MD Member No.: 1083 ![]() |
Is that true color, Stu?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#104
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 ![]() |
Absolutely, catergorically, 1000000% not
![]() As I say in the blog post, that's just me being all arty and creative with one of the images, making it more of a "fanciful portrait" than a true colour representation. Just a "pretty picture", and nowt wrong with that. ![]() -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#105
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1444 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 ![]() |
I don't believe it is. IIRC, Lutetia is expected to be mostly just black-and-white.
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#106
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 ![]() |
I don't believe it is. IIRC, Lutetia is expected to be mostly just black-and-white. I just said that. ![]() The posts are both marked 12:30, so your post was probably posted while Hungry was typing. -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#107
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1444 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 ![]() |
Haha yep
![]() -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#108
|
||
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10196 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 ![]() |
A composite of the last two approach images, the 'Saturn' image and the first of the high resolution set (thank you ESA and the OSIRIS team!)
It reveals an interesting fact... the last (top) image can only be made to match the others if it is flipped left to right - NOT a 180 rotation but a flip. One sequence or the other is reversed. I don't know which. I have these arranged north-up, assuming the approach images are not flipped. If they were flipped these are all south-up. The landslide crater is visible as a bright patch in the last few approach images and the Saturn image. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
||
![]()
Post
#109
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 ![]() |
It reveals an interesting fact... the last (top) image can only be made to match the others if it is flipped left to right - NOT a 180 rotation but a flip. I don't understand why they don't take care of this automatically in their calibration pipeline. It's not the first time this happened, either - recall the Earth flyby image with Australia mirrored left-right. -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#110
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 13-July 08 Member No.: 4264 ![]() |
I admit this is kind of a lame excuse, but the reason is most likely that the spacecraft was flipped 4 hours before closest approach (between the relevant images if I understand Phil correctly) and some of the early release images are taken from early processing levels. Normally those are then rotated and flipped "manually". Apparently we forgot that here......
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#111
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 ![]() |
The similarities with Phobos are striking, the photos clearly show two families of roughly parallel grooves, in two different planes. But the grooves seem to have been obliterated over most of the surface by later big impacts. Not just impacts, but massive impacts creating craters a significant portion of the diameter(s) of the objects. In both cases, the largest impacts probably approach the threshold for completely breaking up their respective bodies. It would make sense to suppose the massive impacts are somehow related to the grooves. Why are Phobos' so much more apparent? It's a matter of perspective. Because Phobos is so much smaller, you have to get a lot closer relatively to see the grooves. It's why the hairs on a flea seem more defined than the hairs on a rabbit. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#112
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 ![]() |
Lutetia's grooves certainly make it more likely that such features have an origin that does not rely on interactions with a planet, either from ring impacts or debris from large impacts on the surface of the planet. That's not to say they rule it out completely but I'm a lot less convinced about them now that we have evidence of very similar features on a body that almost certainly has never been near a planet. Shock effects from impacts, or (far less likely I think) tidal effects from passing near other bodies, seems much more likely now. The similarity with Phobos is quite spooky too.
I'm sure there will be many other interesting findings from this flyby but it's fantastic to see data come back immediately that should help develop better ideas about a really intriguing structural feature on small bodies that seems to be common and not understood. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#113
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 ![]() |
-------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#114
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 559 Joined: 1-May 06 From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia) Member No.: 759 ![]() |
Very nice indeed... poetically rhythmic in measured time, even with the absence of normal rhyme.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#115
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1444 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 ![]() |
I found a couple craters that seemed a bit strange. They have what look like crevaces jutting out of them.
These are the only two craters I've identified with this feature. Anyone have any idea as to what caused this? -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd June 2024 - 10:42 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |