Russia to restart work on nuclear propulsion? |
![]() ![]() |
Russia to restart work on nuclear propulsion? |
Jan 20 2010, 06:47 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1146 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
not identified as nuclear thermal or nuclear electric
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/hyperbol...ests-under.html http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Russia...engine_999.html -------------------- I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.
James Van Allen |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2010, 12:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1008 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Wake me up if it turns out to be Orion.
--Greg (Yikes! It's 4:11 AM) :-) |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2010, 01:31 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 879 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
There was mention some years back of a device that directly utilized the kinetic energy of the fissioning fuel for thrust, seems like that one was pretty unworkable. Wish I recalled more of the details. Like maybe a uranium foil was blipped with N, and the fission products spalled off the back
of the foil. Exhaust velocity was enormous, but the net thrust was extremely low. Recall Dyson's (son) assertion of how many possible thrust technologies there might be. That article sure left out many details. |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2010, 10:14 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 8-January 05 From: Austin | Texas Member No.: 138 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 02:02 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|