IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
March 15, 2010 PDS release
djellison
post Apr 7 2010, 06:20 PM
Post #91


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13799
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Looks like an MI image of a concrete cast block that might have been taken during an MER ORT. Very nice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Apr 7 2010, 08:03 PM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5726
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



For both the one I posted and charborob's (not sure which one was cool!), the image number is in the filename if you save it.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Apr 7 2010, 08:12 PM
Post #93


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4463
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Duh. Thanks.


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Apr 7 2010, 09:27 PM
Post #94


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2344
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE (Phil)
a new version of Ina in Mare Tranquillitatis


Here is an Apollo 15 orbital image of Ina and a PSRD article on lunar venting.

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/WebImg/moon-Ina.gif

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Nov06/MoonGas.html

Ina has been imaged in LROC image M113921307L/R and was discussed in HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING OF INA: MORPHOLOGY, RELATIVE AGES, FORMATION. M. S. Robinson. et al, 41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2010)

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2010/pdf/2592.pdf

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ValterVB
post Apr 7 2010, 11:14 PM
Post #95


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 27-February 10
From: Italy
Member No.: 5235



Here my last experiment with global map. I have used the LDEM 64 with Blender.
http://valter31.interfree.it/LRO_LOLA_DEM_64.jpg

Ciao
VB


ADMIN - DO NOT EMBED A 4000 x 4000 IMAGE STRAIGHT INTO A THREAD!!!

Edited to change it to a link
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ValterVB
post Apr 8 2010, 08:23 PM
Post #96


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 27-February 10
From: Italy
Member No.: 5235



Sorry...

Ciao
VB
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Apr 9 2010, 03:22 AM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5726
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



I said above that I had been looking for Ranger 6. Here it is:

Attached Image


The LROC team just put out a list of sites they have found so far. Turns out Ranger 6 was in the same image I was looking at earlier, I just didn't see it.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Apr 9 2010, 11:44 AM
Post #98


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5726
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



... and Ranger 8. Ejecta are not so obvious in this low sun view. The crater is right at the middle of this cropped image, with a bright 'arrow' of ejecta appearing to point at it. The 'arrow' is really a bit of bright ejecta fringed by two dark rays. This image was subsampled 2x for downlink so it has only 1 m/pixel resolution.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Apr 9 2010, 11:55 AM
Post #99


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5726
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



... and the Apollo 17 SIVB. Here, the pixel coordinates given in their table only work after the raw image is flipped.

EDIT: This does get confusing. Their pixel coordinates have to be flipped to get the right spot. But the image as presented is in the correct orientation. I had flipped the image to match their coordinates, but now I see they had already taken care of the image (but NOT the coordinates!). So my image shown here was originally reversed. I have now corrected it.

(PS - how do I know it's the right way round? - comparison with a Lunar Orbiter 4 image of the area)


Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ValterVB
post Apr 28 2010, 09:54 AM
Post #100


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 27-February 10
From: Italy
Member No.: 5235



Here you can see the video of the Moon made with LDEM 64.
I have used all the point from 71 to -71 of latitude.

Ciao
VB
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st October 2014 - 10:15 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.