IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Deep Impact, General discussion about the mission
cIclops
post Mar 6 2005, 12:46 PM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



Thanks for the image ObsessedWithWorlds, it's good to see proof that the camera works smile.gif

Deep Impact have the image on their site now with a caption that i'll paste here to save clicking.

"Four days after launch from Cape Canaveral on January 12, 2005, the Deep Impact spacecraft pointed at the Moon to test its telescopes, cameras and spectrometer. This image was taken on January 16, 2005, with the Medium Resolution Imager (MRI). It was a 9.5 sec exposure. The spacecraft was more than 1.65 million kilometers (1.02 million miles) from the Moon, and a little more than 1.27 million kilometers (789,000 miles) from Earth. The spacecraft is scheduled to impact comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpa...mpact-moon.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cIclops
post Mar 25 2005, 04:08 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



Only 100 days to impact and still no update from the Deep Impact team, hopefully no news means good news.

Here is another site to browse while waiting for the encounter to begin: spacetoday


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Mar 25 2005, 04:15 PM
Post #18





Guests






QUOTE (cIclops @ Mar 25 2005, 04:08 PM)
Only 100 days to impact and still no update from the Deep Impact team, hopefully no news means good news.

Here is another site to browse while waiting for the encounter to begin:  spacetoday
*


I got an email from the Deep Impact website:

DEEP NEWS
Newsletter for the Deep Impact mission
Issue #20, March 2005


The Deep Impact twin spacecraft is entering its third month in space. The project team is hard at work implementing their carefully planned mission. The spacecraft launched on January 12th from Cape Canaveral and is on its way to its July 4th impact with Tempel 1. What's been happening with Deep Impact? Read below to find out. If you aren't familiar with the Deep Impact mission, take a look at:
http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov
http://deepimpact.umd.edu

Image of Moon/Jupiter:

http://deepimpact.umd.edu/gallery/commissioning.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cIclops
post Mar 26 2005, 08:11 AM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



From Deep Impact Mission Status 03.25.05

the good news:

"NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft has completed the commissioning phase of the mission and has moved into the cruise phase."

the not so good news:

"At completion of the bake-out procedure, test images were taken through the High Resolution Instrument. These images indicate the telescope has not reached perfect focus."


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Mar 26 2005, 08:58 AM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



QUOTE (cIclops @ Mar 26 2005, 08:11 AM)
"At completion of the bake-out procedure, test images were taken through the High Resolution Instrument. These images indicate the telescope has not reached perfect focus."
*


Oh dear, Hubble disease again mad.gif

Hope it's not too bad...


--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DEChengst
post Mar 26 2005, 11:25 AM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 270
Joined: 29-December 04
From: NLA0:
Member No.: 133



QUOTE (dot.dk @ Mar 26 2005, 08:58 AM)
QUOTE (cIclops @ Mar 26 2005, 08:11 AM)
"At completion of the bake-out procedure, test images were taken through the High Resolution Instrument. These images indicate the telescope has not reached perfect focus."
*


Oh dear, Hubble disease again mad.gif

Hope it's not too bad...
*



--------------------
PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DEChengst
post Mar 26 2005, 11:27 AM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 270
Joined: 29-December 04
From: NLA0:
Member No.: 133



QUOTE (dot.dk @ Mar 26 2005, 08:58 AM)
Oh dear, Hubble disease again  mad.gif

Hope it's not too bad...
*


It's not uncommon for things like this to happen. Cassini had a similar problem that got solved by extra bakeout cycles. So we'll just have to wait and see what happens.


--------------------
PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roby72
post Mar 26 2005, 07:50 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 122
Joined: 26-June 04
From: Austria
Member No.: 89



The image of Jupiter taken with the HRI looked unsharp - I think it must be sometimes sharper and is described as "not reached focus" at the Deep Impact homepage.

Robert
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Apr 5 2005, 02:07 AM
Post #24


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4405
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



http://aviationnow.ecnext.com/free-scripts...rticle=04045p04

Here is the latest. Looks bad.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Apr 5 2005, 11:35 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Apr 5 2005, 02:07 AM)


You can say that !

I can't find out if they're planning more backing out cycles or not. Seems to me they're telling us however, that it doesn't have to do so much with the moist itself (in blurring the image), but with it's influence on the focal length (and dimensions of the scope-tube).

I don't like to say these kind of things, but it doesn't make sense to me that they "forgot" to implement an extra (secondairy) focussing device in the imager. I just don't get it. It is SO important to have a crisp view of what's happening in these seconds, that they should have put more effort in making sure it can be callibrated in more than 1 way !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gpurcell
post Apr 5 2005, 06:47 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 127



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Apr 5 2005, 02:07 AM)


There goes the extended mission....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 5 2005, 07:02 PM
Post #27





Guests






I'm looking into this matter myself -- I suspect that, given the cost problems with recent Discovery missions (including this one), they simply could not afford such a secondary focusing system. After all, they haven't had one on other cameras on planetary spacecraft, and were presumably gambling that it would not be necessary this time -- although this is by far the most powerful optical system ever put on a planetary spacecraft. As for how much ground-based deconvolution can compensate for the problem: I'm hearing conflicting accounts.

But at any rate this may be a further consequence of the crisis that the Discovery Program has now encountered, and which forced them to completely cancel their last mission selection -- namely, that the current cost cap for scientifically worthwhile Discovery missions has simply become too low and must be raised, at the expense of flying the missions less frequently than was previously the case. As was pointed out recently, given the cost rise in launch vehicles and the less general inflation rate, the Messenger mission -- which was initialy accepted beneath a $300 million cost cap -- would take $430 million to fly today. And the current cap is only $350 million, so obviously something has to give. The new Discovery mission selection round -- which will be initiated this month -- will have a raised cap.

We are now running out of Solar System missions that can be so cheap and yet make significant new scientific discoveries at this point. By insisting on flying one new Discovery mission per year, we have been flying them at a faster rate than the rate at which new technical innovations can cut their cost back down. And one conclusion of NASA's new Solar System Strategic Roadmap Committee is that, in another decade, the same thing will start happening to the the medium-cost New Frontiers missions as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cIclops
post Apr 21 2005, 07:56 PM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



edit: oops nothing to read here now, i see sunspot has already posted this story elsewhere.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Apr 27 2005, 11:13 PM
Post #29





Guests






http://www.planetary.org/news/2005/deep_im...mpel1_0427.html

Deep Impact's First Glimpse of Its Destiny

Two months away from its rendezvous with a comet, Deep Impact has caught its first glimpse of its target. Comet Tempel 1 was 63.9 million kilometers (39.7 million miles) away from the spacecraft when it captured the snapshot at right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cIclops
post Apr 28 2005, 08:22 AM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



Nasa Mission News

now just 68 days to impact


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

13 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 04:17 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.