My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Deep Impact, General discussion about the mission |
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Jun 23 2005, 11:54 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Guests |
Both Giotto and Stardust got clouted by several particles a sizable fraction of the mass of bullets, but travelling MUCH faster -- two such impacts knocked Giotto into a wobble that caused it to temporarily lose contact with Earth during its flyby, and Stardust got hit by four or five big enough to pierce the outer layer of its Whipple shields. (Its attitude-control system had been switched to an emergency high-thrust mode, so that even getting periodically shot -- there's no other word for it -- failed to shake its attitude stability.)
Presumably these are indeed fragile, easily crumbling clods, or they would have done a lot more damage. In fact, the local, high-density cloud of small particles that Stardust unexpectedly plowed through at one point when it was hundreds of km from Wild 2 seems to have been the result of a jet of such larger particles ejected from one of the comet nucleus' geysers -- which then evaporated their ice and exploded into puffs of their tinier component grains after they had traveled some distance from the comet, exactly like a fireworks display. (This model of explosively ejected fragile clods which then fragment further also seems to best explain the behavior of comets when they break up.) But, fragile or not, they are a real hazard for comet exploration spacecraft, and must be taken very seriously. |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 12:17 AM
Post
#62
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
The 70 km/sec bit was the very rough figure for Giotto relative to Halley.
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 11:50 AM
Post
#63
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 26-March 04 From: Edam, The Netherlands Member No.: 65 |
Something else: I wil try to take a look what happens with my C8. Could someone tell me what will be the exact time (corrected for one way light-time) of the impact ?
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 01:37 PM
Post
#64
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 510 Joined: 17-March 05 From: Southeast Michigan Member No.: 209 |
Take a look at the Griffith Observatory page:
"The collision between the Deep Impact impactor and the nucleus of Tempel 1 is to be within a few minutes of 10:52 p.m. PDT on July 3 (allowing for the seven-minute light time delay between the actual collision and when its effects are seen here)." Tempel 1 may be difficult in a C8. I had a gander in it a couple of weeks ago in my 12.5" dob and it took some some work to see. It's fairly diffuse and my skies are only so-so as far as light pollution goes. You'll probably need some really dark skies. Good luck! -------------------- --O'Dave
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 02:37 PM
Post
#65
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
Can someone tell me why all images taken so far are taken with Medium res camera?
They said that HRI is fixed... HRI has 10x resolution of MRI...so why not HRI??? -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 03:23 PM
Post
#66
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 04:09 PM
Post
#67
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Toma B @ Jun 24 2005, 09:37 AM) Can someone tell me why all images taken so far are taken with Medium res camera? They said that HRI is fixed... HRI has 10x resolution of MRI...so why not HRI??? Because of the focus issue with the HRI, images taken by it have to be mathematically deconvoluted to give them proper focus. That deconvolution process is time-consuming. So, I imagine they are taking pictures with the HRI -- it is just taking some time for those pictures to be processed such that they are in focus. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2005, 01:24 AM
Post
#68
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 378 Joined: 21-April 05 From: Portugal Member No.: 347 |
Hi,
Image contrast will suffer from the deconvolution. Spatial resolution will be recovered, and I think that the images of the comet nucleous will be fine, but to image the coma, jets, and other large tenuous features around it you need contrast. So my guess is that the MRI, even with lower resolution, might record this structures much better. Also, there isn't much detail in the latest images, so in my opinion the HRI wouldn't give better results at the present time. -------------------- _______________________
www.astrosurf.com/nunes |
|
|
|
Jun 26 2005, 05:16 PM
Post
#69
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
Hope this isn't a repost (I skimmed the topic but couldn't find it):
Dan Maas, of the awesome MER animations fame, has turned his rendering attentions towards Deep Impact. ![]() Encounter Animation (Requires QuickTime) -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
|
Jun 26 2005, 10:09 PM
Post
#70
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 259 Joined: 23-January 05 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 156 |
QUOTE (Deep Impact Animation page) Using optical measurements, the impactor's AutoNav software will steer itself to the brightest object in its line of sight, the Sun-facing side of Tempel 1's nucleus. I sure hope there aren't any bright jets positioned so that the impactor ends up aiming off into empty space... |
|
|
|
Jun 27 2005, 02:57 AM
Post
#71
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 19-June 05 Member No.: 415 |
QUOTE (4th rock from the sun @ Jun 24 2005, 07:24 PM) Image contrast will suffer from the deconvolution. Spatial resolution will be recovered, and I think that the images of the comet nucleous will be fine, but to image the coma, jets, and other large tenuous features around it you need contrast. So my guess is that the MRI, even with lower resolution, might record this structures much better. Also, there isn't much detail in the latest images, so in my opinion the HRI wouldn't give better results at the present time. If you look at the JPL website, you see that the MRI has a focal length of 2100cm and a diameter of 12. That makes it F/17.5. The HRI has a focal length of 10500cm and a diameter of 30. That makes it F/35 or twice as "slow" as the MRI. "Speed" helps in photographing dim things like the coma, which favors the MRI. |
|
|
|
Jun 27 2005, 07:19 AM
Post
#72
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 26-March 04 From: Edam, The Netherlands Member No.: 65 |
QUOTE (odave @ Jun 24 2005, 01:37 PM) Take a look at the Griffith Observatory page: "The collision between the Deep Impact impactor and the nucleus of Tempel 1 is to be within a few minutes of 10:52 p.m. PDT on July 3 (allowing for the seven-minute light time delay between the actual collision and when its effects are seen here)." Tempel 1 may be difficult in a C8. I had a gander in it a couple of weeks ago in my 12.5" dob and it took some some work to see. It's fairly diffuse and my skies are only so-so as far as light pollution goes. You'll probably need some really dark skies. Good luck! Thanks ! But....impact will be 6:50 in the morning at my place. Sun rises 1 hour and 23 minutes before: it wil be daylight then ! |
|
|
|
Jun 27 2005, 01:44 PM
Post
#73
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 510 Joined: 17-March 05 From: Southeast Michigan Member No.: 209 |
I'm shut out too, Tempel 1 will be below my horizon at impact time
From what I've read, the change in brightness from the impact is expected to be too faint to be observed visually, but it could show up in CCD images. Let's hope our more westerly friends have their cameras rolling! -------------------- --O'Dave
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2005, 04:21 PM
Post
#74
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
Gas jets shoot from Deep Impact’s target
Plumes of dust and gas shooting from Comet Tempel 1, captured in a Hubble Space Telescope image, have given a preview of what may be seen on 4 July when NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft smashes into the comet. Hubble captured the brief spurt of activity on the icy body while performing a practice run for its observations on 4 July. The jet of gas and dust was seen in several images snapped over the course of eight hours on 14 June http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/d...cts-target.html |
|
|
|
Jun 27 2005, 06:19 PM
Post
#75
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
QUOTE (Gsnorgathon @ Jun 26 2005, 03:09 PM) I sure hope there aren't any bright jets positioned so that the impactor ends up aiming off into empty space... I didn't know about that till last week. I just assumed that it would be like Huygens, Deep Impact would aim itself at the nucleus, then it would release the impactor, and finally DI would aim itself safely away. This ability to auto-navigate is a worry, not just for you and me, particularly in light of the new jet. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 04:17 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|