IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Passing the Torch, Another Milestone for the MER mission
Astro0
post May 19 2010, 12:17 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



So it seems for the amazing Mars Exploration Rovers that another sol has come and another milestone has been reached.

Opportunity has passed the Viking 1 lander for operational time on Mars - 2245 sols.
While Spirit remains in hibernation, there's no way to know whether she has the record.
I'm sure that Opportunity will happily stand aside for Spirit when we hear from her again wink.gif

Here's a banner logo and desktop image to mark the milestone.

Attached Image


Attached Image


Enjoy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
helvick
post May 28 2010, 01:02 AM
Post #2


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



I can't speak for anyone else but as an engineer I have to take my hat off and bow to the master and his team. We've seen discussions about wipers, fans, electrostatic plates, tilting and shaking panels and a host of other solutions to a problem that the team eliminated by designing the best possible system they could to meet the objectives they had been given.

The pre-flight assessment said 0.25% power loss due to dust deposition per Sol. So they built a set of arrays that would give them 90 Sols of mission even with 0.25% per sol losses. Anything better than that was a bonus and here we are 2000 and whatever sols later with at least 50% of the mission still powering along and we can't rule out the other 50% waking up sometime. Come on folks - if you can't see that as a vindication of good, no scratch that, awesomely great design then you really do need to reconsider your standards (in my humble opinion at any rate).

I'd say that pretty much conclusively proves that fans, wipers, electrostatic wotsits and tilting panels would all have been a pointless waste of valuable time and money and the decision not to invest time and energy into them was a very smart move by MarsEngineer and his band of MERry men (and women).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Poolio
post May 28 2010, 04:14 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 28-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 4469



QUOTE (helvick @ May 27 2010, 08:02 PM) *
a pointless waste of valuable time and money...

...and mass. With mass such a precious commodity in terms of launch and EDL criteria, adding gizmos to clear the solar panels would mean giving up something else. Or possibly investing in a bigger booster and redesigning the landing system... which, now that I think about it, is exactly what you said... time and money.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post May 28 2010, 08:21 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Poolio @ May 28 2010, 05:14 AM) *
...and mass. With mass such a precious commodity in terms of launch and EDL criteria, adding gizmos to clear the solar panels would mean giving up something else.


I think what would have given, would have been the large multiple folding arrays - after all, with a cleaning gizmo such large arrays wouldn't have been needed to make it through the primary mission. This would have given us less power in the summer and if it failed (or plain didn't work, given how little we knew/know about the mechanics of the dust) then they would have have had a much more serious problem during winter.

I personally don't think they would be roving today if it hadn't been for the simple yet oh so effective array design that the team came up with. All hail the MER engineering team for getting us a frankly astonishing 2.255 THOUSAND sols into a 90 sol mission! wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Astro0   Passing the Torch   May 19 2010, 12:17 PM
- - climber   I believe I'll not be the only one to enjoy. T...   May 19 2010, 12:41 PM
- - vikingmars   Great idea (and visual) Astro0 !!! Her...   May 19 2010, 08:14 PM
|- - tedstryk   Cool, although hopefully 2010 won't stick.   May 19 2010, 09:10 PM
||- - vikingmars   QUOTE (tedstryk @ May 19 2010, 11:10 PM) ...   May 20 2010, 07:26 PM
|- - climber   QUOTE (vikingmars @ May 19 2010, 10:14 PM...   May 19 2010, 09:47 PM
|- - vikingmars   QUOTE (climber @ May 19 2010, 11:47 PM) D...   May 20 2010, 07:36 AM
|- - NW71   QUOTE (vikingmars @ May 20 2010, 08:36 AM...   May 20 2010, 11:05 AM
- - climber   ...as well as an encredibly good communicator (I m...   May 20 2010, 10:40 AM
- - Stu   ... and that's why I love this place so much, ...   May 20 2010, 07:34 PM
- - MarsEngineer   Thank you Olivier! I am flattered by you (...   May 25 2010, 01:11 AM
|- - eoincampbell   QUOTE (MarsEngineer @ May 24 2010, 06:11 ...   May 25 2010, 02:59 PM
- - Oersted   So, Rob, did the team never consider the possibili...   May 25 2010, 07:10 PM
- - MarsEngineer   Oerstad, we did consider wind. We even considered ...   May 26 2010, 05:54 AM
|- - Fozzie   This might be a silly question, but why wasn't...   May 27 2010, 05:57 AM
- - djellison   That's been asked a thousand times. Go look ...   May 27 2010, 06:20 AM
- - Oersted   Maybe if somebody goes back to solar on Mars one d...   May 27 2010, 07:51 AM
- - Gsnorgathon   Some time ago, I read something, somewhere (yes, v...   May 27 2010, 10:49 PM
- - helvick   I can't speak for anyone else but as an engine...   May 28 2010, 01:02 AM
|- - Poolio   QUOTE (helvick @ May 27 2010, 08:02 PM) a...   May 28 2010, 04:14 AM
|- - jamescanvin   QUOTE (Poolio @ May 28 2010, 05:14 AM) .....   May 28 2010, 08:21 AM
- - serpens   Helvik, such a sensible comment. Bravo!   May 28 2010, 04:32 AM
- - ElkGroveDan   Here's a trivia question that maybe the missi...   May 28 2010, 01:47 PM
- - djellison   Probably in the 500-1000 kwhr range I'd have t...   May 28 2010, 01:58 PM
- - fredk   I'd estimate we're approaching a MWhr of t...   May 28 2010, 02:29 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:27 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.