IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Small Body Grooves, Theories for the formation of grooves on Lutetia and Phobos
Phil Stooke
post Jul 10 2010, 09:15 PM
Post #1


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The best set of grooves on any object since Phobos. This has to put an end to the 'grooves caused by Mars ejecta' argument. fantastic object and a wonderful data set. And this is just the highest priority data, all the rest still to come.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
bk_2
post Jul 11 2010, 06:25 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-March 10
Member No.: 5252



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 10 2010, 09:15 PM) *
The best set of grooves on any object since Phobos. This has to put an end to the 'grooves caused by Mars ejecta' argument. fantastic object and a wonderful data set. And this is just the highest priority data, all the rest still to come.

Phil


The similarities with Phobos are striking, the photos clearly show two families of roughly parallel grooves, in two different planes. But the grooves seem to have been obliterated over most of the surface by later big impacts.

Once again I have to say they look like the tracks of intersection with rings, edge on. What else could carve a long smooth trench on the surface of a large object in space? Where Lutetia might have encountered rings is not going to be easy to answer, the chaos of the early Solar System is way beyond our scrutiny. The grooves do seem to be very old features, pockmarked with small craters, as well as restricted to areas clear of debris from the big ones.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Jul 14 2010, 01:07 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



I like the ring-intersection theory for creating the grooves. I would interpret them as being the result of the decay of one or more non-equatorial ring systems, which I could easily envision having formed as the result of grazing impacts on Lutetia. This is similar to the ring system decay speculated to have formed the equatorial bulge around Iapetus, except for a non-equatorial ring. We might anticipate that these would be common on asteroids large enough to support a ring system following grazing impact (enough gravity to keep the fragments in orbit). With this in mind, watch for grooves around Vesta and Ceres. We'd probably see them on the Moon if not for the instability of lunar orbit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bk_2
post Jul 15 2010, 07:58 AM
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-March 10
Member No.: 5252



QUOTE (algorimancer @ Jul 14 2010, 02:07 PM) *
I like the ring-intersection theory for creating the grooves.


Your idea of rings around Lutetia (and others) in decaying orbits is new to me. What mechanism would cause the decay?

My theory is that the grooved body was in orbit around a much larger one, and that the rings were associated with the large mass. The grooved body had an elliptical orbit co-planar with the circular rings, and ploughed through them edge on as it swooped in for each close approach. For a tidally locked satellite this would also account for the lack of grooves on the trailing face, as we see so clearly on Phobos.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:56 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.