IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Small Body Grooves, Theories for the formation of grooves on Lutetia and Phobos
Phil Stooke
post Jul 10 2010, 09:15 PM
Post #1


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The best set of grooves on any object since Phobos. This has to put an end to the 'grooves caused by Mars ejecta' argument. fantastic object and a wonderful data set. And this is just the highest priority data, all the rest still to come.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
bk_2
post Jul 11 2010, 06:25 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-March 10
Member No.: 5252



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 10 2010, 09:15 PM) *
The best set of grooves on any object since Phobos. This has to put an end to the 'grooves caused by Mars ejecta' argument. fantastic object and a wonderful data set. And this is just the highest priority data, all the rest still to come.

Phil


The similarities with Phobos are striking, the photos clearly show two families of roughly parallel grooves, in two different planes. But the grooves seem to have been obliterated over most of the surface by later big impacts.

Once again I have to say they look like the tracks of intersection with rings, edge on. What else could carve a long smooth trench on the surface of a large object in space? Where Lutetia might have encountered rings is not going to be easy to answer, the chaos of the early Solar System is way beyond our scrutiny. The grooves do seem to be very old features, pockmarked with small craters, as well as restricted to areas clear of debris from the big ones.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Jul 21 2010, 11:18 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1454
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



While I can see how that would apply to Phobos (though reorientation events would be required to explain the observed sets of grooves), I'm not sure it could be stretched to cover Lutetia. Lutetia, as far as we know, hasn't orbited a planet, and getting a situation to work where the asteroid would spend enough time in the vicinity of one to experience reorientation events would be difficult.

Furthermore, for ring impacts to create lines, the moon's orbit must be coplanar with the ring plane, otherwise an entire hemisphere gets blanketed when puncturing through the ring(s). In the case of Phobos, coplanarity with a ring would be best explained if Phobos formed from the ring. IIRC, Mars and Phobos are not believed to have the same composition, so having Phobos form from the ring is implausible. Another idea is that a hypothetical third moon could come in and get disrupted at the altitude where Phobos passed though on its current tidal inspiral toward Mars. This requires the hypothetical third moon to be coplanar with Phobos' orbit. If this is satisfied, we need a mechanism for reorientating Phobos. Interaction with a fourth moon that was since ejected?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:56 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.