IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Small Body Grooves, Theories for the formation of grooves on Lutetia and Phobos
Phil Stooke
post Jul 10 2010, 09:15 PM
Post #1


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The best set of grooves on any object since Phobos. This has to put an end to the 'grooves caused by Mars ejecta' argument. fantastic object and a wonderful data set. And this is just the highest priority data, all the rest still to come.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
bk_2
post Jul 11 2010, 06:25 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-March 10
Member No.: 5252



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 10 2010, 09:15 PM) *
The best set of grooves on any object since Phobos. This has to put an end to the 'grooves caused by Mars ejecta' argument. fantastic object and a wonderful data set. And this is just the highest priority data, all the rest still to come.

Phil


The similarities with Phobos are striking, the photos clearly show two families of roughly parallel grooves, in two different planes. But the grooves seem to have been obliterated over most of the surface by later big impacts.

Once again I have to say they look like the tracks of intersection with rings, edge on. What else could carve a long smooth trench on the surface of a large object in space? Where Lutetia might have encountered rings is not going to be easy to answer, the chaos of the early Solar System is way beyond our scrutiny. The grooves do seem to be very old features, pockmarked with small craters, as well as restricted to areas clear of debris from the big ones.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Jul 21 2010, 04:41 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Ring materials will preferentially strike the highest elevated spot(s) along their ground track, assuming circular orbits. As we consider primary objects that are successively smaller in size, the irregularity of the object, on average, will increase. For altitudes that are sufficient high, even a quite irregular object will manifest a gravitational field as emanating from a point source, as the altitude decreases, however, the irregularity of the object and the resulting gravitational field will cause increased dissipative losses in the ring plane materials as the orbiting particles 'feel' the irregularities and experience velocity changes, and even out of plane effects. The ring 'particles' will grind amongst each other more, and the angular momentum transfer process will increase in efficiency in dissipating the ring structure.

For scenarios that might require considerable time for successive realignments of the spin axis, the rapid dissipation of the ring materials (either from the high or low side) would seem to present a difficulty in having sufficient duration while the materials are available.

Another complication, for orbiting materials to collapse to the LaPlacian plane, my understanding is the oblateness of the primary is the key factor in facilitating the process. For grossly non-spherical objects, I am not sure how oblateness might be characterized. Perhaps there might be some guidelines on how close the measurements of a triaxial ellipsoid have to be to each other for the LaPlacian process to commence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:56 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.