My Assistant
14 years, your thoughts.... |
| Guest_Oersted_* |
Sep 19 2010, 10:37 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Science_...ry#Power_source
"The MMRTG is designed to produce 125 watts of electrical power at the start of the mission and 100 watts after 14 years. The MSL will generate 2.5 kilowatt hours per day compared to the Mars Exploration Rovers which can generate about 0.6 kilowatt hours per day. Although the primary mission is planned to last about 2 Earth years, the MMRTG will have a minimum lifetime of 14 years." I know it might be considered hubris, but I cannot get this number out of my mind. If all goes well after landing, we might have a mission that will outlive some of us Earthbound followers. With JPL famously over-engineering the rovers, I am convinced that they have done something similar for Curiosity. Are there any mission-critical components that - with 100 percent certainty - will not last beyond two-three years? I doubt it, but would like to know. If all goes well on landing, and if the rover longevity is what we might hope, what will that mean for how we approach this mission conceptually? - Obviously no "living-on Mars-time" as in the early rover days. Probably no mad dashes, thinking that every day could be the last. But will we ever really see MSL being operated with a long-term plan in which a grand research design spanning several years is being adhered to? Would that even make sense? Your thoughts please... |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 20 2010, 12:10 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
If all goes well on landing, and if the rover longevity is what we might hope, what will that mean for how we approach this mission conceptually? - If we had known Spirit and Opportunity would last years - would their first 90 sols have been any different? Maybe - slightly. They might have taken more time in Eagle crater, perhaps. BUT - you CAN NOT run a mission with a primary mission of 2 years, under the assumption you will last 3, or 5 , or 11. Those two years you run the rover as hard as you can, get the most you can out of it. Then and only then as you approach the possibility of an extended mission do you start thinking about how to run beyond that. The engineering and science teams will begin to shrink, the abilities of the rover diminish. It's a moving goal. |
|
|
|
Oersted 14 years Sep 19 2010, 10:37 PM
SFJCody I think it's possible that if Curiosity is suc... Sep 20 2010, 01:44 AM
Oersted Cody, I do hope you are right! That is an amaz... Sep 21 2010, 02:20 PM
djellison QUOTE (Oersted @ Sep 21 2010, 07:20 AM) W... Sep 21 2010, 03:01 PM
Oersted so that would be: speak to ..... you? Sep 21 2010, 03:47 PM
djellison No, NASA HQ.
You will see mention of having to ma... Sep 21 2010, 04:08 PM
pospa Curiosity mission extension, ... already?
From sp... Dec 6 2012, 09:25 PM
stewjack QUOTE (pospa @ Dec 6 2012, 05:25 PM) ... Dec 7 2012, 12:47 AM
Explorer1 Ha, on that timescale, and if nothing happens to t... Dec 7 2012, 01:44 AM
Fran Ontanaya Maybe this frees right away the next rover from ca... Dec 7 2012, 02:05 AM
ToSeek Curiosity is the first time I've thought that ... Dec 10 2012, 05:24 PM
MrNatural Let's not get too carried away; MSL does have... Dec 11 2012, 02:28 AM
nprev The longevity of MSL is subject to a large number ... Dec 11 2012, 03:21 AM
PDP8E There has already been a decade long process of fu... Dec 12 2012, 01:32 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 06:30 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|