IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Kitchen Junk Drawer, Exchanges that need to be put somewhere
climber
post Jul 8 2011, 12:03 PM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



If I'm right the 2 bold lines we're very close to, crosse at 10 km East and 16 Kms South from Eagle, while Spirit's point is close to 11km East and 17 Kms South.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 8 2011, 04:58 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



It is 9km and 10km E, respectively.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 9 2011, 08:43 AM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



blink.gif hum hum cool.gif
Google Mars give me 17,702 km in strait line to Eagle, it can't be 9 & 10 Eduardo. rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 9 2011, 12:22 PM
Post #79


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



"17,702 km"

Are you sure that wasn't to Deimos?

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 9 2011, 12:56 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



laugh.gif Again this measurement issues mad.gif
The coma separates kms AND meters here in Europe.
So I should have written 17702 meters... but I like your reply smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 9 2011, 01:15 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (climber @ Jul 9 2011, 07:56 AM) *
The coma separates kms AND meters here in Europe.
That's an interesting way of putting it rather than saying the coma in Europe replaces the decimal point used in the US. But then you would have to write: 17,702 km,m
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 9 2011, 01:29 PM
Post #82


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Ok thanks. I'll paid more attention next time smile.gif
Now, I'm still interested in knowing where we are from Eagle. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 9 2011, 04:48 PM
Post #83


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's an overview of the region with a 1000 m grid superimposed. There is always a slight variation between images like these because of relief distortions etc. so this is close to Tesheiner's grid position but not exactly identical. But it allows one to count grid cells quite easily.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 9 2011, 05:41 PM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Thanks Phil, very handy.
This confirm 16S/10E smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 10 2011, 04:32 PM
Post #85


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Mmm, really? wink.gif
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 10 2011, 06:10 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I'd said we are both wrong rolleyes.gif
Can we agree Spirit's point is very close to 17 kms South and 10 km East of Eagle?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NW71
post Jul 10 2011, 08:49 PM
Post #87


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 19-January 10
From: Grimsby, N.E. Lincs, UK
Member No.: 5179



QUOTE (climber @ Jul 9 2011, 01:56 PM) *
The coma separates kms AND meters here in Europe.


I'll be very happy to be put right on this from those with a more scientific background than myself but I think when Climber refers to Europe in this example he is referring to continental Europe rather than including the UK. In Britain, I would hope I could speak for the majority in saying that I would read 17,702 km in the same way it is read in the US rather than the European interpretation. That is to say as nearly 18 thousand kms as opposed to nearly 18 kms.

This is not to say which is right, just commenting on how data is interpreted/shown in different ways.

Neil
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
machi
post Jul 10 2011, 10:46 PM
Post #88


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 796
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



17.702 (USA+UK) = 17,702 (continental Europe)
It's similar problem as miles vs. kilometers, or short scale (billion = 1 000 000 000 in USA and UK) vs. long scale (billion = 1 000 000 000 000 in most continental European countries).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jul 11 2011, 01:18 AM
Post #89


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



I remember the preference being 'thousand million' instead of billion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jan 4 2013, 03:28 PM
Post #90


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (Paolo @ Jan 3 2013, 12:35 PM) *
I am a bit surprised and deceived that neither Science nor Nature (nor Aviation Week) have said a single word on the flyby in their latest issues...

deceived?


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 01:38 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.