Mike Brown's Planets, season 4: sabbatical |
![]() ![]() |
Mike Brown's Planets, season 4: sabbatical |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
Now on sabbatical, Mike Brown has recently reactivated his mainly Transneptunian blog. Here is a tasty two-parter on Sedna for starters: http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2010/10/t...ere-part-2.html
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4732 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Sloughhouse, CA Member No.: 197 ![]() |
I like Brown's writing style.
-------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 22-March 09 From: West Hartford, Connecicut Member No.: 4691 ![]() |
Excellent blog and mind stimulating
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 257 Joined: 23-January 05 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 156 ![]() |
And now, we interrupt your regularly scheduled program, to announce that Eris ain't so big after all.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
The consequences of which discovery could be far reaching indeed: http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2010/11/d...-are-crazy.html
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
After some plutonic intrusions, the next instalment of the Sedna story: http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2010/11/t...ere-part-3.html
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
After another long lull, obsessive-compulsive rechecking of Mike's blog site is rewarded:
http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2013/11/s...s-in-space.html |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
The essence of that article and the linked paper is that you can't make a large rocky body by assembling many small icy ones.
Here's a go at that problem. Start with a population of small particles, mostly silicate (rockdust), some ice. Suppose that rock-rock collisions are very bad at resulting in coalescence whereas ice-ice and ice-rock collisions do so more easily due to the absorption of energy by plastic deformation and partial melting. The rock particles would never find a permanent home until they ran into an already formed icy object. As the object grows it becomes better and better at trapping the ubiquitous rockdust. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14036 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 ![]() |
Suppose that rock-rock collisions are very bad at resulting in coalescence whereas ice-ice and ice-rock collisions do so more easily due to the absorption of energy by plastic deformation and partial melting. Is there anything in the literature to suggest those suppositions are true. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
Probably not, but does there have to be? Maybe there is but I don't know about it. It seems to me self-evident that the ice/water phase change would facilitate coalescence.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14036 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 ![]() |
It seems to me self-evident that the ice/water phase change would facilitate coalescence. Many many things in deep space are the inverse of self-evident. And yes - there does have to be something...some sort of evidence that your theory holds water. Experimentation, simulation etc to lend it validity. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3441 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 ![]() |
Many many things in deep space are the inverse of self-evident. Experimentation, simulation etc 1/ Very true! 2/ OK here's my winter project, following up on Mike Brown's entertaining terrestrial snowball anecdotes. I will try to make two snowballs collide and coalesce in mid-air. I expect it will require many attempts and I will need some help from the family. If anyone would like to volunteer for the control group your task is to make it happen with two stones. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 26-August 13 Member No.: 6994 ![]() |
Is there anything in the literature to suggest those suppositions are true. I'm sure ngunn's suggestion is on Mike Brown's list of possibilities, but no, there probably isn't any solid info to support it at the moment. As I understand it, we know how to form "pebbles" up to around 1 cm (from lab experiments and some theory), and then how to form larger bodies once you've gotten up to 1 km planetesimals (from bulk material properties), but in between is full of question marks. I can't remember the proper buzzwords for a good ADS search but one recent example paper is "Growth and fragmentation of centimetre-sized dust aggregates: the dependence on aggregate size and porosity," Farzana Meru, et al., MNRAS 435, 2371 (2013). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1838 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 ![]() |
I suspect the solution to the problem will turn out to be surprisingly simple.
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2018 - 11:26 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
![]() |