IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

240 Pages V  « < 62 63 64 65 66 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity Route Map
CosmicRocker
post Dec 11 2005, 07:56 AM
Post #946


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Dec 9 2005, 09:05 PM)
Let's not overlook the great work of Pando and Dilo and Tesheiner on mapping Mars!  And all our panorama-makers, without whom maps are much harder to make....
Phil
*

No one here will ever be overlooked. It's just your turn to be glorified. smile.gif

I just wish I better understood more details of how you and others are creating these lovely maps. I can do the transformation of panoramas to other projections, but nicely tying the resultant pieces together seems to be the tricky part. I have no desire to compete with you guys. But I would like to understand, as I suspect others would.

Can someone toss us a bone? A rubber one will do.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 11 2005, 07:53 PM
Post #947


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10229
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Take my recent maps as examples - Dilo might be doing it differently.

First, I create a base map, a greatly blown up MOC image, to get the geometry right.

Then if it's practical, I will paste onto it the JPL vertical projections, if there are any. But this is often not practical because they rarely fit together properly. Each one looks good alone, but if you overlay them the distortions in each one become very apparent. That's because they are based on oversimplified topographic models (usually just a plane). But if I can I'll use one or more of those as a starting point.

Then I'll make polar projections of each available pan. These can then be distorted - rubber-sheeted if necessary using multiple tie points, or just stretched and skewed a bit in simple cases - to fit the MOC and any vertical projections. The trick is to get a good match of position to as many features in the MOC as possible. The hole in the centre of each pan can usually be filled with another image, front hazcam during approach or whatever.

Finally, the seams are suppressed by carefully matching tones across boundaries between the various fragments of the photomosaic.

What I'm describing works much better in very flat areas like Anatolia than it does in the areas of high dunes such as Opportunity's current location. If there's a lot of local relief the joins between different reprojected pans are much more difficult.

I do all the graphic work in Photoshop, and rubbersheet using the GCPWorks module in PCI v6.2, a remote sensing/GIS program. PCI has a much more modern version called Geomatica, but it's much more complex and tedious to use. They could make money selling their old GCPWorks as a stand-alone, but the ^$#$ won't do it. I've tried to tell them they are passing up on a good opportunity. That's why I really want a better rubber-sheet program.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Dec 11 2005, 08:20 PM
Post #948


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3008
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



I'm looking forward to your polar projections of the bedrock areas at Olympia/Mogollon. There is an interesting fabric to the pattern of fractures, etc, that would be easier to interpret as a polar.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 11 2005, 08:59 PM
Post #949


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10229
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Like this one?

Sol 649. I think the original pan was by jvandriel. I did a bit of cosmetic work on the horizon, not very carefully. I left it south-up.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 11 2005, 09:16 PM
Post #950


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10229
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Or this?

Sol 651. By the way, does the rocky mound by the wheels have a name?

North up on this one.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Dec 11 2005, 09:26 PM
Post #951


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



CosmicRocker, you asked about my technique for route map construcion/integration.
When a good panorama isn't yet available, I start to construct the mosaic using a very artigianal anti-vignetting tool (based on PSP illumination effect). Then I match images, normally using AutoStitch; lot of work is often needed to have a flat horizon; moreover, sometime, AS program introduce also a vertical distorsion (the image height is varing with azimut) so I need to correct with PSP again. Possibly, some rotation and local luminosity/contrast adjustment are needed too.
When obtained a good panorama, with a flat horizon and good overall uniformity, I englarge it's canvas in order to have a cylindrical map (horizon must lie close to the center height).
The panorama is then used as a texture in PovRay. For vertical projection, it is projected on a flat terrain 1.5m below the point of view. If rover is tilted, further adjustments are needed (pitch and roll angles). Usually, I make a 2000x2000 map with a scale of 10cm/pixel. Some fine luminosity/contrast adjustments are often needed, locally and globally.
Finally, the most difficult part is identify the location and merge with previous projections. Following suggestion from Forum members, I use as background a rescaled MOC image (like Phil strategy) and try to orient/translate the center portion of vertical projection on common features. Sometime, I use also some heading referring points for orientation (like far craters) because in the past I was accumulating orientation errors... (another suggestion from members!)

As you can see, is not an easy task; I have to dedicate lot of time on each step and sometimes results weren't fully satisfyng. For this reason, ironically, I enjoied recent Opportunity stall because gived me possibility to work on other tasks... wink.gif


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 12 2005, 01:52 AM
Post #952


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10229
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is a different version of the Sol 649 polar pan. The middle distance is emphasized. North is at the top.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Dec 12 2005, 07:56 AM
Post #953


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



OMG!! smile.gif smile.gif I begged for a bone and you guys served me up a feast. biggrin.gif

...so much to digest, though. You guys are good, and I bow to your expertise. Your explanations help me better understand the work you do to create these beautiful maps. But it is now apparent that I have much work to do if I would hope to be an apprentice. I am overwhelmed.

Thanks for the details. I think I will enjoy your maps while I hone my basic skills in the image processing software that I have.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Dec 12 2005, 11:56 AM
Post #954


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3008
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Yes, Phil, thanks for the feast! Those polars are exactly what I was thinking about.

I've lost track of place names. I'm not sure what the outcrop in Sol 651 is named; it fascinates me because it may be related to the "dark bluff" at the Mogollon Rim/Payson outcrop.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 13 2005, 03:36 AM
Post #955


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10229
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is the second of the Sol 649 pans, originally by jvandriel, in polar form.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post Dec 13 2005, 04:21 AM
Post #956


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



New JPL Oppy Route Map to Sol 659

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ToSeek
post Dec 13 2005, 05:07 PM
Post #957


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 5-May 04
Member No.: 74



How close is Opportunity to leaving the landing target oval? It can't be very far now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Dec 13 2005, 05:21 PM
Post #958


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



Here is an older route map (out of date now), but it shows the landing ellipse line just south of the Erebus crater.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Dec 13 2005, 05:26 PM
Post #959


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (Pando @ Dec 13 2005, 05:21 PM)
Here is an older route map (out of date now), but it shows the landing ellipse line just south of the Erebus crater.
*



Here's the whole context:

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/0...llipsefinal.jpg


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
odave
post Dec 13 2005, 05:36 PM
Post #960


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 209



Here be Dragons!

wink.gif


--------------------
--O'Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

240 Pages V  « < 62 63 64 65 66 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 11:22 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.