IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Cassini hazard avoidance, Any change in risk assessment?
jasedm
post Feb 14 2011, 09:11 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



I was hoping that perhaps a umsf member could shed some light on our knowledge regarding perceived risk to Cassini from material in the Saturn system, and whether this has changed since orbit insertion.

This pertains specifically to the 'protective attitude' that Cassini is commanded to adopt during ring-plane crossings (with the high-gain antenna pointing in the direction of travel to act as a shield to the rest of the spacecraft)

This orientation obviously has costs in terms of hydrazine, data loss (ring-plane crossings are often at or near periapse, when multiple targets are within useful range) and must therefore affect command sequence-planning quite heavily

I was surprised at the low-level flybys at Enceladus, with the spacecraft in effect flying through the south-polar plumes, and also Cassini being directed through the G-ring arc (surely a largely unknown environment in terms of particles at the time) for the Aegaeon encounter.

The cosmic dust analyzer on board is perhaps less glamorous than the remote-sensing instruments, but I wonder if its data continue to indicate danger in crossing the ring plane just outside of the F ring?

Any answers much appreciated...

Jase


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:53 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.