My Assistant
Cassini hazard avoidance, Any change in risk assessment? |
Feb 14 2011, 09:11 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
I was hoping that perhaps a umsf member could shed some light on our knowledge regarding perceived risk to Cassini from material in the Saturn system, and whether this has changed since orbit insertion.
This pertains specifically to the 'protective attitude' that Cassini is commanded to adopt during ring-plane crossings (with the high-gain antenna pointing in the direction of travel to act as a shield to the rest of the spacecraft) This orientation obviously has costs in terms of hydrazine, data loss (ring-plane crossings are often at or near periapse, when multiple targets are within useful range) and must therefore affect command sequence-planning quite heavily I was surprised at the low-level flybys at Enceladus, with the spacecraft in effect flying through the south-polar plumes, and also Cassini being directed through the G-ring arc (surely a largely unknown environment in terms of particles at the time) for the Aegaeon encounter. The cosmic dust analyzer on board is perhaps less glamorous than the remote-sensing instruments, but I wonder if its data continue to indicate danger in crossing the ring plane just outside of the F ring? Any answers much appreciated... Jase |
|
|
|
jasedm Cassini hazard avoidance Feb 14 2011, 09:11 PM
toddbronco2 While the turns to the Dust RAM orientation do tak... Feb 15 2011, 07:55 AM
jasedm Thanks for the detailed response Todd - much appre... Feb 15 2011, 09:31 AM
Frank Crary QUOTE (jasedm @ Feb 15 2011, 09:31 AM) Th... Feb 19 2011, 11:30 PM
jasedm I see I see!
When 'dust hazard' is f... Feb 20 2011, 10:17 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:53 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|