Cape York, Landfall! |
Cape York, Landfall! |
Aug 30 2011, 07:55 AM
Post
#401
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1089 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 10:26 AM
Post
#402
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Not sure if this rock has a name, but I think the big block on the right is Tisdale 18. Tisdale 24 with Tisdale 18 on the left. The 2x1 mosaic and (IMO) the whole rock field visible on it was named "Stoughton". AFAIK, all the rocks on this site have been named upon several lithotectonic assemblages on eastern Canada. From Volcanism of Eastern Canada: QUOTE The 2,677 million year old Abitibi greenstone belt in Ontario and Quebec is one of the largest Archean greenstone belts on Earth and one of the youngest parts of the Superior craton which sequentially forms part of the Canadian Shield. Komatiite lavas in the Abitibi greenstone belt (pictured) occur in four lithotectonic assemblages known as Pacaud, Stoughton-Roquemaure, Kidd-Munro and Tisdale.
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 12:02 PM
Post
#403
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 13-April 06 From: Malta Member No.: 741 |
The white stuff seems to be coating a lot of rocks in this area..it is necessary to know what it is!!
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 12:24 PM
Post
#404
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
...it is necessary to know what it is!! Your enthusiasm is commendable. Hopefully it is paired with an equal amount of patience. There is a quickly growing list here of things that are 'necessary to know'. I too would like to see the top of Tisdale 2 investigated, especially after a good brushing. |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 02:16 PM
Post
#405
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Tisdale 24 with Tisdale 18 on the left. Um... You didn't get that my "NASA map" with all those numbered 'Tisdales' was a joke...? -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 02:28 PM
Post
#406
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4247 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Maybe he did - in the absence of official names for the rocks here, we'll take anything on offer! I actually like the idea of Tisdale n, for n > 0. At some point individual names gets silly.
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 03:33 PM
Post
#407
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's impossible to tell if someone is being funny or sarcastic or ironic on the internet without gratuitous use of smileys, winks etc etc.
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 03:38 PM
Post
#408
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
I think most people here got that my labelled map was a joke...
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=178052 The "* not really" and big smiley were something of a giveaway, I think. -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 04:02 PM
Post
#409
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 810 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
A compilation of the different rocks imaged by Opportunity so far,
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 04:08 PM
Post
#410
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 04:28 PM
Post
#411
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Nope, I haven't defined anything. Those numbered Tisdale rocks were all named and numbered by the MER team, you can see that on the Tracking site.
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 05:34 PM
Post
#412
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3431 Joined: 11-August 04 From: USA Member No.: 98 |
I guess we have to be clear here. Tisdale 1 through 5 are labels from the tracking data, and so are 'official'. At the moment, anything above 5 only appeared in Stu's joke post, and was just a little joke. The names in neo56's post are accurate as far as we know right now and were not defined by Stu.
Adding: And to completely kill the joke: as Tesheiner pointed out, the area over there is apparently called "Stoughton". So Tisdale's days are numbered. (Sorry.) Well, I thought it was amusing, Stu. |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 07:40 PM
Post
#413
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 08:07 PM
Post
#414
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 810 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
Oops, sorry for my misunderstanding I thought only one rock was called Tisdale and those with numbers had temporary names given by members of UMSF.
Anyway, what's relevant is not their names but what they are made of. I'm looking forward the first results of the APXS analysis. -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 08:21 PM
Post
#415
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 20-January 06 Member No.: 652 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 10:26 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |