IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NRO declassifies GAMBIT and HEXAGON spy sats
Paolo
post Sep 18 2011, 12:35 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1339
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43 35' 53" N 1 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



in the Earth observations forum... or sort of, it must be noted that yesterday the NRO declassified the KH-7 and -8 GAMBIT and KH-9 HEXAGON high resolution photographic spy sats of the 60s, 70s and 80s.
here you can find some pics of the "rolling stock-sized" KH-9 http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1568
and on the NRO sites you can find hundreds of declassified documents http://www.nro.gov/foia/declass/GAMBHEX.html
unfortunately, all imagery from orbit seems to be redacted at this time


--------------------
I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.

James Van Allen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Sep 18 2011, 08:48 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 752
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



An old friend told me once of visiting NPIC a long time ago and seeing one wall in a lobby decorated with a single HEXAGON photo which covered almost an entire country. You could see the overall mapping of the country from far away and walk up close to the wall and see airfields and individual airplanes in incredible hi-res.


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Jul 10 2012, 07:34 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1339
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43 35' 53" N 1 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



NRO has just declassified its experimental 1960s QUILL imaging radar spy satellite
http://www.nro.gov/foia/declass/QUILL.html
see in particular the sample images in the QUILL Lecture Transcript and consider that they were taken 15 years before JPL's Seasat and 25 years before Magellan!


--------------------
I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.

James Van Allen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Jul 10 2012, 03:38 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 413
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (Paolo @ Jul 10 2012, 02:34 AM) *
NRO has just declassified its experimental 1960s QUILL imaging radar spy satellite
...... consider that they were taken 15 years before JPL's Seasat and 25 years before Magellan!


Fascinating ! Don't forget there was radar sounding on Apollo 15 (which I think used similar curved mirrors to do the SAR processing optically), and radar scatterometry from orbit on Skylab. But QUILL predates those by almost a decade.

A quick look at the material (some rather redacted) suggests most UMSFers will be interested in the document 22,
the testing report by Goodyear, the radar instrument contractor
http://www.nro.gov/foia/declass/QUILL/22.%...-%20Testing.PDF

which has many example images. Unfortunately the reproduction quality is rather poor, but you can see that the radar worked pretty well...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Jul 10 2012, 04:15 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 413
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (rlorenz @ Jul 10 2012, 10:38 AM) *
a quick summary slide with example image


Attached File(s)
Attached File  Quill_rlorenz.pdf ( 221.85K ) Number of downloads: 248
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st August 2014 - 09:52 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.