Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

PLATO, PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars
post Dec 7 2011, 07:16 PM
Post #1


Group: Members
Posts: 283
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482

I saw this brief ESA blurb about a potential successor to the Kepler mission:

It is under review along with Euclid and the Solar orbiter, but only 2 of these 3 missions will have funding to move forward. According the the website:
"The final decision about which missions to implement will be taken after the definition activities are completed, which is foreseen to be in mid-2011."

I found news on ESA's website that makes it appear that PLATO did not make the cut.
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=49385 ://http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/ob...objectid=49385

This is surprising to me considering that TESS was not selected by NASA, so it appears there are no follow up telescopes planet to expand upon Kepler's success, which is restricted to such a small survey site. I wonder if there might be another way to fund PLATO? The only other information I've gleaned so far is this website:

Are these missions getting bumped in part due to the need to have JWST perform follow up studies? It'd be nice to see space telescopes getting fast-tracked instead of sidelined, and something else needs to replace Kepler in another 8 years.

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Dec 7 2011, 07:51 PM
Post #2

Director of Galilean Photography

Group: Members
Posts: 797
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93

Well, Kepler to me was more of a "reach into a bag of marbles and get some statistics on what's there" kind of mission. It won't tell us which exact nearby stars to look at, but rather which type of star is more likely to have Venus to Marsish planets. A followup JWST or other mission to examine all nearby star systems would be more valuable than another "reach" into the bag. There might be some science to do on a mission looking a different direction, to get a feel for how statistics vary depending upon metallicity of the star or spiral arms vs core vs halo, but the majority of the science would have already been done by Kepler.

Now, if nearby surveys *don't* find anything interesting, then a follow-on survey of more stars is warranted.

Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Marz   PLATO   Dec 7 2011, 07:16 PM
- - hendric   Well, Kepler to me was more of a "reach into ...   Dec 7 2011, 07:51 PM
- - dtolman   PLATO has been selected for 2024 launch by ESA as ...   Feb 20 2014, 02:39 PM
- - Floyd   Link to the ESA announcement. Link   Feb 20 2014, 04:26 PM

Reply to this topicStart new topic


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th November 2015 - 02:18 AM
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.