Map Features Overlays on a Cylindrical Projection |
![]() ![]() |
Map Features Overlays on a Cylindrical Projection |
Feb 14 2012, 05:50 PM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 508 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
There are a couple of other considerations as well. First is that I wrote a routine to convert the USGS label data in planetographic coordinates to my map that is in planetocentric. Actually the USGS maps (and presumably, feature coordinates) are really planetocentric, in that the coordinates of features on non-spherical moons are defined by the orientation of the direction to the body center rather than the direction of the local surface normal. The fine print explains that they are "planetographic relative to a spherical surface" or something like that. What they mean by "planetographic" is not that surface normals are used to define coordinates (they aren't), but that west longitudes are used (planetocentric coordinate systems traditionally use east longitudes). Very confusing- it took me a long time to sort this out myself. John |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2012, 05:56 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4489 |
QUOTE Very confusing- it took me a long time to sort this out myself. no kidding same here , but i still have to look things up . |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2012, 06:04 PM
Post
#18
|
||
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 741 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
The fine print explains that they are "planetographic relative to a spherical surface" or something like that. What they mean by "planetographic" is not that surface normals are used to define coordinates (they aren't), but that west longitudes are used (planetocentric coordinate systems traditionally use east longitudes). Thanks much for the elucidation. Here is a link that looks to be consistent with this scenario: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/TargetCoordinates And here is the result when I refrain from doing the transformation: Steve -------------------- Steve [ my planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
|
||
Feb 15 2012, 07:37 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 741 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
-------------------- Steve [ my planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2012, 08:47 PM
Post
#20
|
||
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 741 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
And here is Europa with features larger than 40km. I'll have to consider whether to rotate the labels for some of the Linea:
-------------------- Steve [ my planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
|
||
Feb 15 2012, 09:18 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 741 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
-------------------- Steve [ my planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
|
Feb 18 2012, 08:12 PM
Post
#22
|
||
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 741 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
Here's Iapetus, with a 5 degree shift that appears to reconcile the image with the IAU convention of the feature longitudes.
Other versions can be found here (for Iapetus along with other objects): http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/features I just figured out how to select the fonts, so future revisions should have an improved look. -------------------- Steve [ my planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
|
||
Feb 29 2012, 02:00 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4586 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
A very nice project, Steve - I'm enjoying these maps.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 12:08 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|