My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Cassini Imaging - More Agressive? |
Feb 28 2005, 01:04 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4408 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
It seems that starting with T3, Cassini was much more agressive in imaging available targets. It seemed to turn more to image more moons. Am I imagining this, or was Cassini being ultraconservative when it still had Huygens?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2005, 01:26 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1279 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
I think it has to do with its Lower orbit.
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2005, 06:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
well...it is true that when it still had Huygens, its moment of inertia was much higher and thus the turn rates were lower.
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Mar 2 2005, 03:47 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guests |
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 01:18 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1279 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
QUOTE (Sunspot @ Mar 2 2005, 10:47 AM) I hope Cassini had her cameras pointed at Titan on March 1, 22:35 UT: Oh yes! Very nice. http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/ima...&storedQ=921943 |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 01:42 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 524 Joined: 24-November 04 From: Heraklion, GR. Member No.: 112 |
I think Sunspot would like an image of Titan with Saturn on the background.
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 08:24 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
I think that the "string of pearls" imagery where several moons are seen in a row along the line of Saturn's rings is very beautiful.
I am actually surprised at how visible the rings are edge-on, given how thin they are. I would have expected them to disappear against the background of Saturn altogether. Perhaps they are not precisely edge-on? |
|
|
|
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Mar 3 2005, 09:32 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guests |
They pretty clearly are not completely edge-on in those photos -- there are some where the width of the thin triangle of visible ring is a bit wider than others. (Which is hardly surprising.)
The interesting question I myself haven't seen answered yet is whether the edge-on photos featuring Prometheus and Pandora -- which show a clear gap between the thin illuminated line of the F Ring and the thin illuminated line of the other rings -- are just due to this viewing-angle effect, or whether they're showing actual out-of-plane tilting or warping of the F Ring. (My guess is the latter. In one of those photos, Pandora, which of course is outside the F Ring, seems to be BETWEEN the plane of the F Ring and the plane of the other rings.) http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=33326 http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=33330 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:40 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|