IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

77 Pages V  « < 16 17 18 19 20 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL Curiosity Lands Safely in Gale Crater, Landing and Commissioning Activity Period 1A, sols 0-8
Tesheiner
post Aug 6 2012, 07:35 PM
Post #256


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Aug 6 2012, 09:31 PM) *
Interesting -- Google Chrome doesn't display this page properly. Ever since the wee hours when I first pulled this page up, in Chrome all I get are image placeholders and clicking on any of the placeholders just re-displays the same page with the placeholders.

Works just fine, as designed, when I access the site via Internet Explorer 9.

Just an FYI for y'all.

-the other Doug

It happened to me early on but the problem disappeared by reloading (F5) the page. Cleaning the cache might solve it too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 6 2012, 07:36 PM
Post #257


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (Pando @ Aug 6 2012, 08:32 PM) *
MSL on the other hand already looks like it's been on Mars for a while. It's got dusty lenses and dirty wheels with pebbles rolling around inside.


MER's were inside airbags, MSL was under a jet plume.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AdamH
post Aug 6 2012, 07:37 PM
Post #258


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 12-March 11
Member No.: 5892



QUOTE (ugordan @ Aug 6 2012, 07:09 PM) *
Mt. Sharp!
Attached Image


If I'm interpreting that correctly, the filled channel they're considering as a primary traverse route should be just to the right of that downslope on the right side of the image. The "fence" that's beyond the dune field might be just off to the right in the distance. Anyway, those features at the bottom of the slope are going to get a *whole* lot bigger. I've dropped a 50m tall marker in the channel in the image below. The fence itself is a good 50m or so tall.



--------------------
Software developer for NASA NPP. And I make things to amuse myself: Gale Crater mini-game
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 6 2012, 07:40 PM
Post #259


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Aug 6 2012, 09:35 PM) *
Trying to compare the dunes we see in the distance to Tesheiner slope maps in Google EarthMars. Looks like there is a gap in HiRISEwhere I think the more interesting details in the dunes visible in the Fcam are located. Not sure if that is a real gap (truly no HiRISE data) or if Tesheiner just didn't include that image.

The mosaic was assembled by jmknapp (I just ported it to GE) and I'm trying to remember the discussion between him and Paolo about that gap.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Aug 6 2012, 07:42 PM
Post #260


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8785
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (Pando @ Aug 6 2012, 11:32 AM) *
When MER rovers landed, they were absolutely pristine--brand new machines with gleaming surfaces from another world, waiting for commands from their masters...

MSL on the other hand already looks like it's been on Mars for a while. It's got dusty lenses and dirty wheels with pebbles rolling around inside.



You have to remember that the MERs (and MPF) were basically encapsulated upon landing; they didn't get 'unpacked' until the bouncing was done, the airbags were retracted, and the petals opened up.

This was a powered descent with very robust thrusters. MSL's big, so it had to be done that way. Not too surprising that some debris was kicked up thereby.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Aug 6 2012, 07:42 PM
Post #261


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



There's a bit of topography visible in the stereo views.

Cross-eyed pair:
Attached Image


Anaglyph (hopefully I haven't swapped L/R in this one):
Attached Image


stphmkre recommended.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Aug 6 2012, 07:46 PM
Post #262


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Ha, Ok maybe I was the one who needed to rewatch it. I remembered that they were towed in after deploy but hadn't noticed that they were straight at landing, I always assumed they would stay pointed in as straightening would be an extra unneeded complication.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 6 2012, 07:48 PM
Post #263


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Could still be an inaccuracy in that video.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Aug 6 2012, 07:51 PM
Post #264


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



It looks to me like Curiosity landed on the edge of the alluvial fan. The firm surface with well-sorted pebbles suggests this, and on the hazcam images you can see that the terrain that Curiosity is currently sitting on, comes to an end well short of the dune field, with a lighter-coloured unit between them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 6 2012, 07:51 PM
Post #265


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (ugordan @ Aug 6 2012, 08:48 PM) *
Could still be an inaccuracy in that video.


The less parts moved around during EDl would be sensible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Aug 6 2012, 07:51 PM
Post #266


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4256
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



You do seem to have L/R swapped, alg.

Here's my attempt (with a bit of de-headaching applied):
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Aug 6 2012, 07:59 PM
Post #267


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



White balanced Mount Sharp cross eye:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 6 2012, 08:00 PM
Post #268


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



It's going to be like driving to the Columbia Hills again, but many times better smile.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tbruckner
post Aug 6 2012, 08:12 PM
Post #269


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 8-October 07
Member No.: 3931



What's the reason why sofar all of the data reveived has been from Odyssey. Shouldn't MRO be able to dump much more data than Odyssey?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marslauncher
post Aug 6 2012, 08:19 PM
Post #270


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 22-October 04
Member No.: 102



Watching Eyes on the Solar System again, It appears we are about to watch sunrise at Gale Crater. Also looks like we may have just had another Odyssey overflight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

77 Pages V  « < 16 17 18 19 20 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th August 2024 - 03:27 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.