IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

21 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL Post Landing - Commissioning Period & Early Observations, Commissioning Activity Period 1B - Sols 9 through 16
climber
post Aug 20 2012, 10:50 AM
Post #101


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (belleraphon1 @ Aug 19 2012, 11:58 PM) *
"It's surprising that the data are even better than we ever had during tests on Earth, in signal-to-noise ratio,"

Does somedody know if ChemCam was ever tested in a simulated Martian atmosphere? can't find any answer myself.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pospa
post Aug 20 2012, 11:04 AM
Post #102


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 4-May 11
From: Pardubice, CZ
Member No.: 5979



QUOTE (orgetorix @ Aug 19 2012, 07:31 PM) *
Looking in the lower-right quadrant of the lower-left quadrant: that roundel with the JPL logo on it: is this post-flight damage? Or was that scar there before launch?

Nope
It's not any damage. The background of JPL logo is our Sun (I guess) with planets on their orbits, see this picture.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Aug 20 2012, 11:21 AM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (MichaelJWP @ Aug 20 2012, 05:29 AM) *
Basically is there anywhere JPL posts a "sol-by-sol" list of what's planned in terms of surface operations for Curiosity for the next few sols?


The mother lode would be the MSLICE software they use internally for mission planning:

Attached Image

Attached Image


Wouldn't hold my breath for that one though! It's interesting that that the Cassini mission puts their science plans on the public NAIF website, encoded as "event kernels." That's kind of rare & maybe a reflection of the old school. The data include when exactly each image/measurement will be taken and for what purpose.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lightning
post Aug 20 2012, 11:21 AM
Post #104


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 15-July 09
Member No.: 4867



QUOTE (climber @ Aug 20 2012, 12:50 PM) *
Does somedody know if ChemCam was ever tested in a simulated Martian atmosphere? can't find any answer myself.

Yes: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrmdgu_le...tech#from=embed at the 34th second.

If you don't speak french, the gray "cannon" tube is where the Mars atmosphere is simulated (pressure, temperature and composition).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Antonb
post Aug 20 2012, 11:47 AM
Post #105


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 6-August 12
From: Leeds, Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 6469



Hello everyone. My first post, so a brief introduction. A newbie poster here, but a daily reader and lifelong spaceflight fan. I still have all the newspapers I collected as a boy when any space-related item appeared, from Sputnik to the moon landings. At 13, when I saw the first Mariner photos of Mars, I was utterly convinced that one day I would go there myself and have a good look around.

Well, all these years have passed, I've travelled far and wide but and I never did make it to Mars. And yet, thanks to NASA, JPL, guys like you and the wonders of the internet, I have indeed been to Mars. In fact, I go there every day and have a good look around, just like I always wanted. Thanks to Stu's excellent "Road to Endeavour" blog, I've followed Oppy every step of the way of her epic journey, and now I'm soaking up every detail of the fantastic, fascinating landscape of Gale Crater.

Thank you, one and all. I am truly grateful.

OK, enough romantic hogwash, I'll stick to science now I've said hello.

Can anyone identify for me which mastcam raw image contains the target site of Glenelg? Using the following data I've walked the route on Google Mars and so I know the part of the panorama I should be looking at, but I'm uncertain as the exact location within a particular raw frame.

Curi: 4°35'22.15"S, 137°26'30.00"E
Glenelg: 4°35'24.00"S, 137°26'55.00"E (estimated)

Antonb
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pgrindrod
post Aug 20 2012, 12:00 PM
Post #106


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 18-July 07
From: London, UK
Member No.: 2873



I'm not sure if this should be here or in the main landing thread (please move if necessary).

There was a bit of discussion about possible traverses. Well, of course, that'll depend on safety and science and we'll find out as we go along. But I thought I'd have a look at the relatively short (how times have changed!) drive of 400 m to the first drive target Glenelg.

Attached Image


(larger version on my website here)

It looks like a gentle drop of about 20 m, with manageable slopes all less than about 8 degrees. Of course, this is just an example traverse plot, but it looks ok.

For anybody interested, I wrote a blog post about my thoughts on the geological context of the landing site, including more of this GIS stuff, and how it might all fit into the story of Mars.

Pete
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Aug 20 2012, 12:18 PM
Post #107


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Lightning @ Aug 20 2012, 01:21 PM) *
Yes: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrmdgu_le...tech#from=embed at the 34th second.

If you don't speak french, the gray "cannon" tube is where the Mars atmosphere is simulated (pressure, temperature and composition).

Thanks! I AM French actually smile.gif ...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Aug 20 2012, 12:20 PM
Post #108


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (pgrindrod @ Aug 20 2012, 02:00 PM) *
It looks like a gentle drop of about 20 m, Pete

I remember John Grotzinger saying 2m. Did I misunderstood?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Antonb
post Aug 20 2012, 12:21 PM
Post #109


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 6-August 12
From: Leeds, Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 6469



Pete, that's really interesting reading, thanks. I note that you calculate Glenelg is probably not visible on the panorama, but is it possible for you to plot the visible parts of your example traverse onto the mastcam panorama?
Antonb
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 20 2012, 12:47 PM
Post #110


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (climber @ Aug 20 2012, 01:20 PM) *
I remember John Grotzinger saying 2m. Did I misunderstood?


I am pretty sure he said 20 m.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Aug 20 2012, 01:04 PM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Antonb @ Aug 20 2012, 06:47 AM) *
....Can anyone identify for me which mastcam raw image contains the target site of Glenelg?

Have you seen Phil Stooke's interpretation in this post?
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Aug 20 2012, 01:06 PM
Post #112


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (pgrindrod @ Aug 20 2012, 08:00 AM) *
There was a bit of discussion about possible traverses. Well, of course, that'll depend on safety and science and we'll find out as we go along. But I thought I'd have a look at the relatively short (how times have changed!) drive of 400 m to the first drive target Glenelg.


FWIW, the Google Mars view (based on a MOLA DEM I think) shows that Glenelg is below a rise in the foreground:

Attached Image


So Glenelg would be on a bit of a slope. Should be a good view from there, almost like looking down into a valley:



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charleski
post Aug 20 2012, 01:43 PM
Post #113


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 7-August 12
Member No.: 6485



Set lasers to analyse!

They've done their first laser shot and posted a contextual image that's a differential of pre- and post-shot. Given that, I'm intrigued by the small scuff seen on the upper left of the pit. Roger Wiens was talking about their interest in seeing what the laser would reveal about rock coatings and surface interactions (34:53 in the telecon) - did they scatter a few pulses off the main pit to take a look?


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Antonb
post Aug 20 2012, 02:50 PM
Post #114


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 6-August 12
From: Leeds, Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 6469



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Aug 20 2012, 02:04 PM) *
Have you seen Phil Stooke's interpretation


Yes, I saw that projection, which led me to believe the mastcam raw image containing Glenelg is this frame. I know Glenelg itself is hidden from Curi right now, but can anyone indicate the general area on this frame that we're heading for?
Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Aug 20 2012, 02:51 PM
Post #115


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Looks like they imaged Mt Sharp with mastcam34 (and parts with mastcam100!) on sol 13. Thumbnails are avaiable.

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=13


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

21 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th May 2024 - 06:30 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.