IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

MARDI images and videos
Nix
post Aug 6 2012, 07:35 AM
Post #1


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



QUOTE (Burmese @ Aug 6 2012, 09:28 AM) *
Do we know what Image data Curiosity will be attempting to upload on the next flyover pass? More hazcams only, or do weexpect to have the mast up and taking pics and ready to send?


in 1 or 2 days?


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Eluchil
post Aug 6 2012, 07:45 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 14-July 06
Member No.: 972



There is a low bandwidth ODY pass that will happen in about 10 minutes that may have a couple new HazCams. Does anyone know when the first MARDI images are expected to be downlinked? I saw that 18 had been assigned a (relatively) high priority, but the JPL Ustream was just saying that the current pass would have only a HazCam or two.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Aug 14 2012, 02:52 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2924
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I'm interested to know which frame of MARDI video would be the most urgent to download from Curiosity in order to help planning the begining of the route.
The frames can be blured by the movments during descent but pending they are looking strait down and the max definition is achieved, I was thinking of the following:
1- when quality equal HirIse (2 kms altitude)
2- twice better (1.320 km altitude)
3- 3 times better (660m altitude)
I then calculate the FOV and get this:
1- 2400m x 1800m (it's what I found here: http://msl-scicorner.jpl.nasa.gov/Instruments/MARDI/)
2- 1584m x 1188m
3- 792m x 984m
I'm wondering what do you think about this?
My opinion is that, with such FOV, the terrain around where we landed look so benign that I don't think MARDI pictures will be of any (real) help for route planning to get to the base of Mt Sharp.
Nevertheless MARDI will help for, say, the first 500m.



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th December 2024 - 12:29 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.