MSL at Rocknest, First scoop samples - sols 57-101 |
![]() ![]() |
MSL at Rocknest, First scoop samples - sols 57-101 |
Nov 14 2012, 02:21 AM
Post
#451
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4508 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Good one!
Scoop Stooke, Ace Reporter -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 11:51 AM
Post
#452
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
It will seems still the sixth scoop...
"We received good data from this first solid sample," said SAM Principal Investigator Paul Mahaffy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. "We have a lot of data analysis to do, and we are planning to get additional samples of Rocknest material to add confidence about what we learn." Fifth scoop anaglyph and martian dust monitoring -------------------- Thank NASA and the American people for Curiosity
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 12:41 PM
Post
#453
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 29-August 12 Member No.: 6622 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 03:22 PM
Post
#454
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2734 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
martian dust monitoring Nice comparison. But the ground well away from the landing plume also changes between the three frames - check out the far upper left corner. Could it be that the image processing isn't identical between the three frames? Perhaps the contrast is higher in the earlier frames, which makes the plume more apparent?
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 07:06 PM
Post
#455
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
The Sun was possible for the sol 6 is lower to a surface. Therefore the relief seems more contrastly.
-------------------- Thank NASA and the American people for Curiosity
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 07:25 PM
Post
#456
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13227 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
FredK's point is that things nowhere near the plume are also changing color during the animation (and they wont have done so) - so there's a problem with the correlation of the images. You're not comparing like with like.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 07:31 PM
Post
#457
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4508 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news/item/sol...-meeting-at-apl
Could lead to another sol or two of delay. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 10:21 PM
Post
#458
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2126 Joined: 9-February 04 From: UK Member No.: 16 |
371 images (so far!), 21144 control points and many, many hours of processing time on my 5 year old computer.
Gigapan: http://gigapan.com/gigapans/118482 James -------------------- My MER & MSL Imagery site - Martian Vistas ---- Twitter Feed (including sol by sol updates on Opportunity's activity)
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 11:13 PM
Post
#459
|
|
![]() Bloggette par Excellence ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3958 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Holy wow!!
Another question: There's a noticeable boundary in the panorama toward the right edge, where it's clear that the images were taken at very different times of day. Is there a reason you didn't choose to place that boundary at the edge of the panorama? I don't see a correspondingly jarring one on the left side of the pan. (That is *not* a critique. I'm thankful you spent the time and effort to assemble this.) -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2012, 11:49 PM
Post
#460
|
||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 129 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
371 images (so far!) Monumentally! You're not comparing like with like. I think now better -------------------- Thank NASA and the American people for Curiosity
|
|
|
|
||
Nov 14 2012, 11:59 PM
Post
#461
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 565 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
Fantastic, James - I'll be spending the next "wee while" wandering around here.
...though my very first zoom-in landed unerringly on the Rocknest Seal, seen here basking by a small crater... |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 08:20 AM
Post
#462
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2126 Joined: 9-February 04 From: UK Member No.: 16 |
Holy wow!! Yes, that is (just about, as of a couple of days ago) all that have been downlinked so far. And yes, there are loads more thumbnails, so there is much more to come. Another question: There's a noticeable boundary in the panorama toward the right edge, where it's clear that the images were taken at very different times of day. Is there a reason you didn't choose to place that boundary at the edge of the panorama? I don't see a correspondingly jarring one on the left side of the pan. I have not adjusted the postition of the wrap boundary at all, doing anything with this much data is a click into the unknown. It is essentially centred on the first image taken. There are a number of boundaries where images are taken at very different times which made the matching a bit of a headache at times! I will use this version to refine my next. This was mainly a first attempt to see it I could actually handle this much data (success!) there will be more refinements as more data comes in. BTW, for those zooming in, I have noticed the black dots/line across the middle. I think this is a bug/limitation in Enblend with very large images. I may try to complile a newer version, I'm using the old version that comes with Hugin for OSX. Failing that I need to find a way of editing it out (or find or write a new blender) -------------------- My MER & MSL Imagery site - Martian Vistas ---- Twitter Feed (including sol by sol updates on Opportunity's activity)
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 03:44 PM
Post
#463
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 17-March 05 Member No.: 206 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 05:36 PM
Post
#464
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1026 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 06:49 PM
Post
#465
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 07:52 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|