My Assistant
MSL Meteorology Results |
Nov 16 2012, 01:59 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 614 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 |
Evidence of the diurnal pressure cycle in the radiation detector data, and the suggestion of dust devil encounters in the meteorology package (REMS) data.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?rele...elease_2012-361 Suggests 'over 20' events with one or more in-situ signatures of dust devil encounters (e.g. pressure drop, wind direction change etc.) In 12 weeks that means only ~0.25 events per day, which is pretty low compared with Phoenix and Pathfinder (more like 1-3 / day, depending on event threshold e.g. see http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/dustde...ssuredrops.pdf) but we'll need to wait and see this published properly to understand what thresholds were used and what correction factors for observation duty cycle need to be applied. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Nov 16 2012, 04:10 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
Still nothing on humidity?
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2012, 09:59 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 85 Joined: 5-September 12 Member No.: 6635 |
Still nothing on humidity? A tongue in cheek answer is that the relative humidity is always 100% at sunrise and 0% at midday. But I'm sure you mean absolute humidity. If/When we do get numbers they will be only a few precipitable microns. Typical earth values are a few precipitable centimeters by comparison. |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2012, 10:30 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
... relative humidity is always 100% at sunrise .... Not sure why it would necessarily be 100% at sunrise unless there was overnight frost, which so far has not been reported. But the intent of my question related to whether any results were reported at the telecon for the humidity sensor. (None have been posted on the weather site.) An earlier post on this blog drew assurances that the sensor was not damaged, even though it is on the damaged boom. Did no one ask about it at the telecon? Is it still being commissioned? |
|
|
|
rlorenz MSL Meteorology Results Nov 16 2012, 01:59 AM
Eyesonmars Can we infer anything about the diameter/size of t... Nov 16 2012, 10:49 AM
Eyesonmars In the press conference it was stated that the RAD... Nov 16 2012, 11:11 AM
AndyG At the surface 50% of the nominal cruise radiation... Nov 16 2012, 11:17 AM
Eyesonmars QUOTE (AndyG @ Nov 16 2012, 11:17 AM) At ... Nov 16 2012, 11:27 AM
AndyG Not simply, Eyesonmars - the RAD "telescope... Nov 16 2012, 01:41 PM
Drkskywxlt Also interesting that the semidiurnal tide seems t... Nov 16 2012, 12:26 PM
Eyesonmars Andy, the detector has a 65 degree cone of view no... Nov 16 2012, 03:17 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (Eyesonmars @ Nov 16 2012, 08:17 AM... Nov 16 2012, 03:57 PM
Eyesonmars http://marsmobile.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multime...s/?Im... Nov 16 2012, 03:46 PM
Reed QUOTE (marsophile @ Nov 16 2012, 02:30 PM... Nov 17 2012, 02:45 AM
MahFL Re radiation. they said Mars and the thin atmosphe... Nov 17 2012, 03:25 AM
Eyesonmars It is amazing that only 18 microns of dust can com... Nov 16 2012, 04:26 PM
djellison Dust storms will do other things - not just put mo... Nov 16 2012, 09:05 PM
serpens Since the comparison is cruise to surface intensit... Nov 16 2012, 09:49 PM
Fran Ontanaya QUOTE (serpens @ Nov 16 2012, 11:49 PM) d... Nov 17 2012, 01:23 AM
mcaplinger QUOTE (serpens @ Nov 16 2012, 02:49 PM) d... Nov 17 2012, 01:43 AM
serpens QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Nov 17 2012, 02:43 AM... Nov 17 2012, 05:52 AM
mcaplinger QUOTE (serpens @ Nov 16 2012, 10:52 PM) V... Nov 17 2012, 06:27 AM
Zelenyikot It is interesting that it will be better as protec... Nov 17 2012, 04:46 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 11:59 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|