My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Sep 9 2012, 04:56 AM
Post
#106
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 139 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Toronto, Canada Member No.: 529 |
EGD, I think you might lose that bet.
I am betting this is not hematite simply because these are hollow spherules; and all of the broken hematite spherules we have seen in the past have been solid. -------------------- -- Robin
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 05:37 AM
Post
#107
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
... is this a view of the outcrop from the Sol 2751 position? I'm not convinced that the current outcrops were visible from the sol 2751 position.Just to echo the sentiments of others, seeing these ancient rocks from the early days of the inner solar system's formation is incredibly fascinating. I've long wondered what the rocks from the bombardment phase looked like. Now, we may be getting to see them for the first time. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 07:16 AM
Post
#108
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1063 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 09:18 AM
Post
#109
|
||
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 6-August 12 From: Leeds, Yorkshire, UK Member No.: 6469 |
This rather nice photo shows "a close-up of a partially devitrified black obsidian from the island Lipari, Italy, with lots of small spherulites in it" that to me at least show similar internal structure to the objects found by Oppy. See the section on "Spherulites and Wall-lining Banding" on this page for details on the growth of spherulites.
|
|
|
|
||
Sep 9 2012, 09:43 AM
Post
#110
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 282 Joined: 18-June 04 Member No.: 84 |
wow, some of those look very similar to the "spherules" in this Oppy image
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...M5P2935M2M3.JPG |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 01:53 PM
Post
#111
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
QUOTE Welcome to the Hadean. I can barely comprehend the conditions in the vicinity of a large impact. Can you imagine what it was like here at the time of the Miyamoto impact? "Plinian" would seem mild in comparison.--Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 02:23 PM
Post
#112
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 158 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Phoenix, AZ USA Member No.: 9 |
I'm waiting for tdemko to weigh in. I see several "sedimentary" structures that are taunting me. Something has happened there. Well, since you asked...! I'm going to have to go with ElkGroveDan's bet and say that I think that these spherules are the same type concretions that have been encountered in the younger, sulphate-bearing units at Meridiani. A while ago, I posted a summary of what the various stratigraphic and stratal geometric relationships between the units at Cape York that could be imaged by MRO, before Opportunity arrived there. As has been illustrated in the published papers, in general, the concretion-bearing sulphate strata onlap the impact-deformed older strata at the crater rim. The crater rim strata were a positive topographic feature throughout the initial time of deposition, and presumably, were eventually buried. This resulted in the apparent angular unconformity we see right now. The surface of the unconformity, however, seems to be quite complicated, which probably should be expected. Not only did it experience impacted related phenomena and ejecta deposition, but also weathering and colluvial deposition pre- and during the Meridiani "transgression" (or glacial advance, depending on your interpretation!). I think right now Opportunity is seeing some of the colluvial and initial Meridiani units in an angular, unconformable relationship with the tilted older strata. The same diagenetic phenomena that created the hematite spherules in the Meridiani strata would also have affected the immediately underlying deformed strata. Unconformities almost always are also boundaries important to subsurface fluid flow (aquacludes/barriers and aquitards/baffles), and can show distinct features reflecting perching/ponding of fluids and/or concentration gradients. The underlying deformed strata likely had zones or units of differing porosity and permeability, as well as original compositional and textural differences. The fluids that created the ubiquitous hematite spherules in the sulphate units must have also diagenetically altered the units at and below the unconformity. -------------------- Tim Demko
BioLink site |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 03:51 PM
Post
#113
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
....The fluids that created the ubiquitous hematite spherules in the sulphate units must have also diagenetically altered the units at and below the unconformity. Ah! That lit a light for me! I was thinking that if the matrix was not the same sulfate sandstone that the hematite concretions formed in, that the sphereules could not be the same hematite concretions. But now I see that the same groundwater which formed the concretions in the Meridiani sulphate layers would have permeated and perhaps formed the same concretions in Endeavour's rim material. Thanks for the illumination. |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 07:11 PM
Post
#114
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
Hi, Tim. So you think that the spherules are just the hematite concretions? Good possibilty. But we'll examine more examples and decide why they (apparently) have a different internal structure and why they (apparently) weather differenly. More color Pancams up today, she'd preparing to RAT/Brush and part of The Outcrop With No Name has been tagged "Kirkwood", P2560.
This is complicated. If we were there, we'd all be at the outcrop flat on our bellies with handlens, brush and hammer busy. --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 07:21 PM
Post
#115
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4260 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 08:58 PM
Post
#116
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
Oh, my there are about a gazillon MIs to look through. Seems like they were earlyish MIs, like pre-Purgatory. They were "similar"-- rind and core, but maybe I think "different" because Hope Springs Eternal. These "seem" to have a more pronounced internal structure, but remember, the wind in this vicinity is strong and persistent enough to keep the pavement down on the bench swept clean and this outcrop uncovered, so the internal structure may be visible due to unusual aeolian erosion.
We'll be seeing a LOT more on the next few days. --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 10:06 PM
Post
#117
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 11:18 PM
Post
#118
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1063 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
R pancam aside, the L257 don't have the same response as the hematite concretions, so if they are concretions there are differences in makeup. The lack of blubes on the top of CY would seem to imply that it was not overrun by the Burnes materiel so if they are concretions (not necessarily hematite) then this implies significant groundwater at the inner rim of the crater with the consequent implication of a lot of water within the crater. (Also indicated by the response of the fill that over-ran the NW crater wall).
I think that identification of the matrix materiel will be a key factor in determining the provenance of these spherules but I think I will tend towards a cluster of impact related spherules/lapilli. While we have seen a few hollow, split blueberries on the plains these have been few and far between and we haven't seen anything like this outcrop before. The 'junk' that dburt drew attention to could possibly be clasts ripped up in a ground surge rather than concretion nucleation sites but as Bill Harris said, these examples have been subjected to long, slow erosion. Preferential erosion seems more likely in lapilli than concretions. Roll on the APXS |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 11:48 PM
Post
#119
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 716 Joined: 3-January 08 Member No.: 3995 |
.
|
|
|
|
Sep 10 2012, 03:38 AM
Post
#120
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1075 Joined: 21-September 07 From: Québec, Canada Member No.: 3908 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:03 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|