IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

39 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152
dvandorn
post Sep 4 2012, 01:56 PM
Post #31


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I'm not yet convinced that the blueberries are embedded into the rocks of this outcrop. They could just be scattered on top of these rocks, either as a lag deposit from previously overlying layers of concretion-bearing rocks that have since been eroded away, or lifted there by aeons of impacts that have redistributed such melt-resistant fragments liberally throughout the area.

A good MI campaign ought to shed more light on whether or not these outcrops have embedded concretions, or just have concretions draped over them.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Sep 4 2012, 04:05 PM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 941
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



I'm a microbiologist--so what do I know--but to my eye, these don't look like blueberries-not round, not shiny, and the ones that have fallen out look more rounded-cubic or random bits than spherical. The sick green-grey (even with Stu playing with colours) doesn't look like the blueberries we have seen before. I'll go with VikingMars and guess dry eroding clay.

Here is a link to a nice image of eroding clay. With no rain and millions of years of wind erosion, I think we could get what we see in front of Opportunity.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 4 2012, 04:49 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4280
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Here is today's mosaic in L2 filter.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Sep 4 2012, 04:55 PM
Post #34


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Floyd, I agree with you re the berries. First thing I thought was "those sure are tiny & funny-looking blueberries..."

Becoming cautiously excited. smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulM
post Sep 4 2012, 05:32 PM
Post #35


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 15-August 07
From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Member No.: 3233



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Aug 31 2012, 01:31 PM) *
Interesting how well those tilted back layers match the red lines in this diagram from a paper by James Wray (interview linked in post 101) et al.

...phyllosilicate-bearing layers (red lines) exposed in Endeavour rim."

From the text:
...layers within the western rim dip away from the crater interior, as expected if the beds predate Endeavour crater and were back-tilted by the impact."
...The Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer could determine major and minor element chemistry, and the Pancam and Microscopic Imager could document grain sizes, shapes, and possible sedimentary textures (e.g., cross-bedding or laminations too fine to resolve from orbit)..."

This paper suggest that the strata that Oppy is currently investigating predates the formation of Endeavour Crater.

I understand that the majority of the group of craters of which Endeavour is one are thought to date from the late bombardment. I think that Endeavour is a good candidate for a crater formed during the late bombardment because it is so eroded.

It is therefore possible that the strata that Oppy is currently investigating predates the late bombardment. If the clays formed during the deposition of this strata then this clay might also predate the late bombardment and might therefore be more than 4 billion years old. If this was true then this clay might predate the Gale crater clays by several hundreds of millions of years.

However, I understand that the prefered theory for the origin of these clays is that they formed due to weathering in crevaces after the formation of Endeavour crater and so might be contemporaneous with those of Gale crater.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Don1
post Sep 4 2012, 07:49 PM
Post #36


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 11-August 12
Member No.: 6536



I'm no geologist, but I'm going with a greenstone/green schist/chlorite schist with embedded garnets. The rock looks finely layered, so maybe it is a schist. The little pebbles could be embedded garnets which have eroded out of the rock. Chlorite is a group of phyllosilicate minerals, some of which contain iron and magnesium. Chlorite could be the source of the Fe/Mg rich phyllosilicates seen in the spectra.

Green schist is a metamorphic rock formed from basalt. Some of the oldest rocks on earth are green schist.

Image here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Sep 4 2012, 08:51 PM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Well I'm even less of a geologist than you obviously are but I really like your suggestion. I'd love those things to be garnets - my favourite mineral. smile.gif However, don't you need huge tectonic movements to produce highly metamorphosed rocks like schist? In favour of the idea: at least schists are hard enough to produce upstanding outcrops, whereas I'd be surprised if eroding clay beds would be.

I expect these rocks to be the progenitors of the clays but not the clays themselves. My reason? A little farther on there is a crater formed into Cape York which CRISM shows to be surrounded by clays (weathered ejecta?) although the interior of the crater appears relatively clay-free.

The Gale crater clays likely have a completely different story to tell. It's an old, old world.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 4 2012, 10:53 PM
Post #38


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



A couple more sections added...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeke4ther
post Sep 4 2012, 11:26 PM
Post #39


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Toronto, Canada
Member No.: 529



I think you have the colour balance better here Stu. You can really tell that we have something special here. smile.gif


--------------------
-- Robin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Sep 5 2012, 12:14 AM
Post #40


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Here is one of those sub mosaic images of the current formation that OPPY is looking at.
The filters used for this shot are the far infrared, far UV, and plain old green... so my hat is off to Stu for pushing them into something that looks more 'real'. I went with crispness smile.gif
Attached Image



--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 5 2012, 01:02 AM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE (PaulM @ Sep 4 2012, 11:32 AM) *
This paper suggest that the strata that Oppy is currently investigating predates the formation of Endeavour Crater.

{SNIP}
Bingo, Paul.

I've been looking at this outcrop line with interest since leaving the Whim Creek stop. Although we've seen distant views of this zone, my initial impression is that brown-toned layered rocks represent a weathered clastic unit unconformably overlying a basaltic impactite that is pre-Endeavour. This unit was, literally, the paleo-surface of a wetter, warmer Mars. We've had glimpses of it in passing below the basal Burns Formation during the last leg of the pre-Cape York part of the traverse.

Here is a enhanced HiRISE image of this part of Cape York. The area of interest is the light-toned (ie, reddish in the RED-filtered HiRISE image) areas near the center of the image (ESP_024015_1775_RED).

http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r91/wil...maker_bench.jpg

You can match up the route of the traverse using Tesheiner's Route Maps.

Closer PanCams and MIs are going to be interesting.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Sep 5 2012, 03:42 AM
Post #42


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Bill: I think the clastic unit underlying the basal Burns formation but overlying the Endeavour ejecta is being unofficially called the Deadwood formation after the target of that name from around sol 2770 or so (near Homestake). It's not exactly what you are talking about, but close. It was discussed in a recent paper that I can't put my fingers on at the moment, but I will try to find it for you.

ngunn: I think I would have to agree with you regarding garnet schist. As much as I'd love to see it, I don't think Mars has been tectonically active enough to have generated much in the way of schist or gneiss.

Right now I find myself agreeing with centsworthII. They look like blueberries to me, though they are on the ragged edge of resolution in these images. Whatever they are, they are embedded in the rock and not just loose granules lying on top. They are resistant to erosion and they are at the head of some mini-yardangs on the surface of the rock, as we have frequently seen with the blueberries out on Meridiani Planum.

We should be able to determine if they are hematite concretions in short order. There is an image set coming from sol 3063 with a full set of right filters...
pancam_Milnet_L234567Rall...
If Milnet is an image of a part of this outcrop, as I suspect it will be, a quick IR ratio image should identify any hematite that may be present.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Sep 5 2012, 04:37 AM
Post #43


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



i tried to stitch a group of these frames together for a 3D, made a headache for the eyes instead! Spectacular outcrop here. The overhanging rock near the top has a nice white vein in it. The rock near the bottom also has such a vein. Perhaps it rolled off eons ago.

Attached Image


And a thanks for the great color panos of these rocks already posted! Really nice work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Sep 5 2012, 04:48 AM
Post #44


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Thick blueberry froth!

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Sep 5 2012, 05:41 AM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1064
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (ngunn @ Sep 4 2012, 08:51 PM) *
I expect these rocks to be the progenitors of the clays but not the clays themselves. My reason? A little farther on there is a crater formed into Cape York which CRISM shows to be surrounded by clays (weathered ejecta?) although the interior of the crater appears relatively clay-free.

The


I expect you are right about the rocks being a precursor although that impact possibly excavated a clay bearing layer which is exposed as ejecta while the crater bowl has infilled? No matter how I torture the L257 the clasts seem to have the same response as the matrix so it seems unlikely they are the same hematite concretions as found in the sulphate sandstone. It would be outstanding if this turns out to be pre Endeavour impact materiel and MIs should be real interesting. This ageing rover has stolen the limelight yet again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

39 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 10:47 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.