Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Nov 8 2012, 02:00 PM
Post
#466
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 26-April 07 Member No.: 2029 |
Is it possible that Endeavor crater eventually filled up with upwelled water after the impact that created it and over time the crater wall in the area of Cape York eroaded away with the water spilling out into the plains? Would it not be prudent to investigate the bottom of the crater in this area to look at possible sediments that may have filtered out at this location?
|
|
|
Nov 8 2012, 02:35 PM
Post
#467
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10194 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
I think it's more likely that we will be able to understand the stratigraphy of post-impact modification. The old rim of Endeavour was subjected to erosion and deposition, maybe multiple times, and remnants of those events are what we might expect to see here. Details of the original rim stratigraphy, especially things like overturned strata at the original rim (probably lost to slumping and erosion long ago) are not likely to be preserved.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Nov 8 2012, 07:06 PM
Post
#468
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
You may well be right, but I think the possibility that the Kirkwood layer is pretty much in situ since the impact cannot be excluded. The obvious chaos only appears upslope from Kirkwood. I'm sure the hunt is on for a possible continuation of the Kirkwood layer at Cape Tribulation.
|
|
|
Nov 8 2012, 09:22 PM
Post
#469
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1045 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
Is it possible that Endeavor crater eventually filled up with upwelled water after the impact that created it ....? Would it not be prudent to investigate the bottom of the crater in this area to look at possible sediments that may have filtered out at this location? Given the evidence of a groundwater table rising to the surface at the elevation of Erebus then there is a reasonable argument for deeper water within Endeavour. But north of Cape York the crater rim was overrun by sulphate sediments which form that intriguing delta like infill, so the crater bottom would probably be more yet sulphate sandstone with hematite concretion lag, covering all the interesting stuff beneath. I guess one question is whether the crater was once completely filled and then excavated to the current topography, or whether the infill reflects the configuration reached before the area became pretty well static. If the latter then the possibility of Endeavour having been a water filled stratigraphic trap would seem to be increased. |
|
|
Nov 9 2012, 09:34 AM
Post
#470
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2012, 10:45 AM
Post
#471
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2012, 05:19 PM
Post
#472
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2012, 12:37 AM
Post
#473
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 215 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
I welcome participants. Allow also to me to take part in discussion.
Surprising repeatability of forms. Rectangular structures under wheels of Opportunity http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...EGP0142L0M1.JPG and from the satellite: -------------------- My blog on Patreon
|
|
|
Nov 10 2012, 12:59 AM
Post
#474
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
The small-scale features are what the team calls the "boxwork" features, around the 3101 and 3103 sites.
We were close to the large-scale rectangular features/lineations/"tardis features" on sol 2742. We tried to spot them in the imagery, but saw nothing conclusive - check around this post. |
|
|
Nov 10 2012, 02:24 AM
Post
#475
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 215 Joined: 23-October 12 From: Russia Member No.: 6725 |
Thanks. Yes, really from above it looked more interesting.
I, as the archeologist, can't quietly look at them -------------------- My blog on Patreon
|
|
|
Nov 11 2012, 11:07 AM
Post
#476
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Nov 11 2012, 01:50 PM
Post
#477
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2012, 03:09 PM
Post
#478
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10194 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
-------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Nov 12 2012, 02:38 PM
Post
#479
|
||
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10194 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
This is the current state of my map of Matijevic hill, trying to fit in all the feature names (I'll add diacritical marks later) with the route. I see I left out Gertrude - if you know any other names I can add please let me know. Names around Whitewater Lake such as Kirkwood will be on a separate close-up map.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
||
Nov 12 2012, 03:54 PM
Post
#480
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Looking good, Phil. Just one question: is "Box Work" the name of a particular feature, or was it just used to describe a type of feature? The latest PS update mentions
QUOTE on Sol 3101... the robot field geologist took pictures of boxwork and possible veins in light-toned bedrock and thenQUOTE on 3103... the MER scientists noted boxwork again. That makes it sound like a type of feature.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2024 - 04:49 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |