My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Nov 12 2012, 04:07 PM
Post
#481
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
I think the answer is "both", Fred, because one of the features imaged during sol 3103 was labelled exactly "Box Work".
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2012, 05:05 PM
Post
#482
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10255 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Good point though - is it really a name or just a description? I have been finding lots of features in the Opportunity feature names database in the Analysts Notebook at PDS Geosciences with names like 'cobble 2' or 'layered ripple', which I don't usually plot as a feature name on the route maps I'm making for future use. Normally I only use things I think are 'real' placenames. I haven't decided about this one yet.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2012, 09:38 PM
Post
#483
|
|||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
Very nice work Phil! There are some more named features ...
rather small Cartier (1+2) on Sol 3117 for instance: The left one is a somewhat different approach to false color (false color plus pseudo color) ... Levack and Lively on Sol 3119 (near Falconbridge), Onwatin on Sol 3124, Nipissing 1+2 Sol 3126, Clara Belle and Agnew Lake both Sol 3128 and maybe much more before Sol 3117 Box Work is indeed the name of that specific Sol 3103 feature - more common descriptions like "rear outcrop", "ejecta" or "driving direction" are allways lower case, specific names upper case ... |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 12 2012, 10:04 PM
Post
#484
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2012, 10:20 PM
Post
#485
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I had to look it up but I now understand 'boxwork' to mean a network of intersecting planes governed by the process of crystal formation. I can't convince myself that these 'boxes' formed that way. The edges are not perfectly straight, in fact there are some quite curvy ones. To me they look more like patterns formed by fracture rather than crystallisation.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2012, 11:07 PM
Post
#486
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10255 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Fractures filled with something and then eroded... I don't think they are intending the name literally to refer to crystallization, just referring to the general morphology.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2012, 11:23 AM
Post
#487
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1621 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 09:08 PM
Post
#488
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2012, 09:34 PM
Post
#489
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2012, 08:57 AM
Post
#490
|
|||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
I used the outer left navcam pics for the anaglyph - so its the same position.
I did a quick polar one: Interesting twitter message from Mike Seibert regarding sol 3132 movement. This one is sol 3133: Near 2 o'clock you can see Kirkwood and the tracks leading there |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 17 2012, 03:50 PM
Post
#491
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4260 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Big jump in tau on 3134 according to the solar pancam images. (No 3134 images showing the horizon down yet.) This is the right time of the year for it.
|
|
|
|
Nov 17 2012, 08:34 PM
Post
#492
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
This image is a bit special, I think, what with a nice complete skyline on top of spectacular geology:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...23P1737R0M2.JPG |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2012, 10:07 PM
Post
#493
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2012, 02:32 PM
Post
#494
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 18 2012, 04:14 PM
Post
#495
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 6-August 12 From: Leeds, Yorkshire, UK Member No.: 6469 |
Fascinating indeed. In the bottom left corner of Stu's anaglyph, it looks like there's a collapsed tube, which meets another in a T-junction. Wind-eroded volcanic remnants?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:01 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|