My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Nov 18 2012, 05:06 PM
Post
#496
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1621 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
A bunch of new Navcam pan today.
Sol 3131 : ![]() Sol 3131 : ![]() And Sol 3135, with very interesting outcrops. ![]() A color close-up :
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 18 2012, 05:15 PM
Post
#497
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2012, 05:57 PM
Post
#498
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10255 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
What a great place this is! Hopefully we have seen enough of the area for a good geological map of the outcrops to be compiled, and some serious analysis of the different units can begin.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Nov 18 2012, 06:27 PM
Post
#499
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 18 2012, 07:30 PM
Post
#500
|
||
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10255 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Ant103's sol 3135 pan in circular form - with a good view of the earlier tracks leading up to Kirkwood. The loop is nearly closed now.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
||
Nov 19 2012, 05:12 PM
Post
#501
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4260 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Not surprizingly, after the bump of 3135 and the closing of the loop, we're set for some IDD work.
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2012, 05:44 PM
Post
#502
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2012, 06:15 PM
Post
#503
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2012, 03:09 AM
Post
#504
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
-------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2012, 08:21 PM
Post
#505
|
||
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
interesting Sol 3137 MI (rotated 90 deg counterclockwise):
This is made up of images from the mi_open_minloss5_DNTH2500_veryhigh series. At the data tracking website there is also mi_open_minloss5_DNTH2500_high and mi_open_minloss5_DNTH2500_medium. I compared veryhigh and high images and for me it looks more like stereo pairs or something - did anyone knows anything about this? They also shoot a 7x1 pancam tosol - Matijevic Pan - this will be nice! |
|
|
|
||
Nov 20 2012, 11:05 PM
Post
#506
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1063 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
Sandcherry and Whitewater Lake look similar. Seemingly the rock is blue gray, fine clastic materiel with a yellowish weathering product. I would anticipate that if the yellow crust is brushed, underlying gray rock will be revealed as with Whitewater Lake. This apparent sedimentary feature seems to be associated with the extent of the spherule deposit and follow the contour – almost as if the spherule rich layer formed a sediment trap. Potentially clay cementing?
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2012, 11:15 PM
Post
#507
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Both Sandcherry and Whitewater Lake seem to have a shiny rind that weathers less and so remains 'bluish'. This suggests to me a surface fused by intense heat such as may have come from a bright bolide passing overhead. Every now and then the sand or mud would have been subjected to such events early in the early history of Mars.
|
|
|
|
Nov 20 2012, 11:24 PM
Post
#508
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2012, 11:59 PM
Post
#509
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
-------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
|
Nov 21 2012, 12:09 AM
Post
#510
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1063 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
ngunn, Since the brush of the yellow material on whitewater revealed underlying blue gray rock it would seem that the yellowish stuff is the weathering product and the raised blue gray surface is just more resistant. Differential erosion possibly due to variations in cementing or chemical variations in the sediment? This deposit is anomalous in that we have seen suevite and other impact breccia both above and below this level while this feature seems a very localised and fine sedimentary construct. This could tie in with the localised clay signature - source and eroded clay mixed in with surrounding sand. Could also of course be something else entirely. Were the results of the Whitewater APXS ever released?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 01:58 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|