IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Making Synthetic L4, L5 And L6 Images
Bjorn Jonsson
post Mar 10 2005, 08:52 PM
Post #1


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2256
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



I have been experimenting with creating synthetic L4, L5 and L6 images for use when one or more of these color channels is 'missing'. So far I have done this for a six image sequence from Spirit starting with image 2P130265292RAD0700P2543L2C1.img from sol 44.

The images I used were RAD files that were radiometrically corrected and converted to PNGs using my IMG2PNG utility. I then measured the intensity of several representative features (the sky, Columbia hills, dunes, hollows, rocky terrain, several rocks etc.) in each image and then determined which combination of two images yielded the best synthetic image in a least squres sense. This is by no means a 'scientific result' but the results looked good:

http://www.mmedia.is/bjj/misc/mer/s044_L456.jpg (L456)
http://www.mmedia.is/bjj/misc/mer/s044_L257.jpg (L5 and synthetic L4 and L6)

These images look remarkably similar. The processing I did is only rudimentary, for example I'm not happy with the color of the sky.

The results of the calculations I mentioned were:

L4=1.408871 x (0.462 x L2 + 0.538 x L5)

L6=1.153437 x (0.305 x L5 + 0.695 x L7)

L5=1.037111 x (0.204 x L4 + 0.796 x L6)

L4=1.223131 x (0.581 x L3 + 0.419 x L5)

This is for the surface/sky only, I made no attempts to make Spirit itself look nice. In an ideal world you'll want to process the resulting synthetic images exactly as if they were 'real' images.

I now plan to do something similar for Opportunity. The results will probably be somewhat different since the terrain there is very different.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Mar 10 2005, 09:04 PM
Post #2


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



Nice results Bjorn! I'll start looking for all those missing images rolleyes.gif


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 8 2006, 01:38 AM
Post #3


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



This is an oooooold thread - but the one I visit probably more often than any other smile.gif

Bjorn - did you ever do the maths for Opportunity? Does it differ from Spirit at all - and if so, any idea why? Same cameras, same filters, I'd have thought the maths would be the same - but it might be slighlty different

For those wondering how to do these processes using photoshop, I can do a tutorial and/or some photoshop actions if you'd like me to.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jan 8 2006, 02:33 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Doug:

That's what you're gonna do at the UMSF Forum!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slinted
post Jan 8 2006, 11:21 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 468
Joined: 11-February 04
From: USA
Member No.: 21



It makes sense that Opportunity's conversion factors would be different than Spirit's.

If I understand how Bjorn did this, then I think this most easily understood as a signal fitting problem. Given an L2 and L5, which factors yields the best fit to the L4. Since average material spectra is different at Meridiani compared to Gusev, I think largely in part to the color of the blueberries, the factors which would best fit an L2-L5 pair to a 'synth' L4 would change as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:02 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.