My Assistant
Mystery Satellite/Probe |
Jun 16 2013, 09:34 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 17 2013, 10:27 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
Thanks Air. I don't think that's it though.
The model is 16 sided with solar arrays on each face yet I'm pretty sure that there are missing parts. If I don't find out what it is, it's not really an issue. Just curious as to what it was and possibly why we have a model of it in our archive. |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2013, 05:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 18-June 13 Member No.: 6954 |
Thanks Air. I don't think that's it though. The model is 16 sided with solar arrays on each face yet I'm pretty sure that there are missing parts. If I don't find out what it is, it's not really an issue. Just curious as to what it was and possibly why we have a model of it in our archive. The model seems to be quit crude. It is certainly not Pollux, as this one is not symetrical to it's "equator" I have found two satellite types, which are quite similar, but not identical:
But perhaps, as this model is not quite rich in details, it might have represented one of those satellites. best regards Gunter http://space.skyrocket.de |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2013, 05:41 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
It is certainly not Pollux, as this one is not symetrical to it's "equator" The representation of Pollux above is an oblique view, which I "certainly" understood when I proposed it and assumed others would understand as well. I'm not asserting that it is Pollux, but I have more sense than to propose something with an entirely different geometric shape. Here is another image of the frame of Pollux mounted to Castor absent its external panels, and appearing quite, "symmetrical to it's equator." [sic] -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
|
Astro0 Mystery Satellite/Probe Jun 16 2013, 09:34 AM
Paolo could be a TETR satellite http://space.skyrocket.d... Jun 16 2013, 09:38 AM
ElkGroveDan It looks a lot like the Pollux part of the French ... Jun 16 2013, 02:25 PM
tasp Does your company have a history as a probe (or pr... Jun 16 2013, 02:56 PM
Astro0 EGD: It looks a lot like the Pollux part of the Fr... Jun 16 2013, 10:49 PM
Airbag This link has an Australian connection but all I c... Jun 17 2013, 07:08 PM
djellison QUOTE (skyrocket71 @ Jun 19 2013, 10:20 A... Jun 19 2013, 05:44 PM
Paolo QUOTE (skyrocket71 @ Jun 19 2013, 07:20 P... Jun 19 2013, 05:46 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (Paolo @ Jun 19 2013, 10:46 AM) why... Jun 19 2013, 07:18 PM
djellison QUOTE (Paolo @ Jun 19 2013, 09:46 AM) why... Jun 19 2013, 08:34 PM
Astro0 OK, I'm going to settle for EGD's interpre... Jun 19 2013, 11:19 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:53 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|