IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

62 Pages V  « < 23 24 25 26 27 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 3: Cooperstown to Kimberley - Waypoint 3, Sol 453 [Nov14,'13] to 595 [Apr9,'14]
djellison
post Jan 30 2014, 04:27 PM
Post #361


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14434
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (fredk @ Jan 30 2014, 07:55 AM) *
Earth is roughly 45 degrees from the Sun now as viewed from Mars.


34.331 degrees right now ( see attachment)

Curiosity (as with MER ) typically gets its commands direct from earth at about 9.30am local time in a window up to 30 minutes long. Can't see the Earth....can't do the uplink. Can't do the uplink...can't start the rovers daily activities until later, reducing the time available for activities.

Right now Earth is an evening star. It rises just to the left of the 'northern' most base of Mt Sharp - a bearing of 69 degrees. Sunrise (in LMST) is 05:55. earthrise is 08:23 - 2.5hrs after Sunrise.

Any local topography can of course delay the Earth 'rising'.

Topography like this - http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/ra...251M_&s=527 - could easily add a 20 degree mask to the horizon in the direction of the Earth (infact, I can see cases there of 25 degrees or more) - which would add a further 1 -> 1.5 hours to the Earth Rise time. Thus the Earth may only locally 'rise' as much as 4 hours after a nominal 'sun rise'. So that means you have to push your DFE uplink time from 9:30 to a LEAST 10am, and ideally 10:30 to allow the Earth to be well above the local horizon. Thus - between uplink and sunset, we would have lost about an hour of usable time.

This is a situation that will be even worse once we're at the base of Mt Sharp - apart from times when Earth is a 'morning' star and rises 2 - 3 hours before the Sun does. In 150 sols time, Earth will rise at 02:50 LMST, 2.5hrs before Sunrise - so the masking wont actually be a problem. But another couple of hundred sols after that - it'll eat into the day again.

Yes - orbiters can be used (and are used for pretty much every single bit of downlink) - but to forward commands onto the rover via UHF requires a longer lead-time, and interrupts the daily planning cycle significantly. You would see symptoms similar to restricted sols almost constantly.

( For those that don't have it - grab Mars 24 to see Sunrise/Sunset Earthrise/Earthset times http://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/mars24/ )
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Jan 30 2014, 06:21 PM
Post #362


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Wow, already a toe dip in the dune!

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 30 2014, 06:42 PM
Post #363


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4256
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Love the view through the gap. Anaglyph:
Attached Image

Cross-eyed:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 30 2014, 06:43 PM
Post #364


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10207
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



http://www.midnightplanets.com/web/MSL/ima...CAM00253M_.html

And a look over the dune. Oh yeah, that's a lot smoother!

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ap0s
post Jan 30 2014, 06:54 PM
Post #365


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 19-September 13
Member No.: 7005



QUOTE (walfy @ Jan 30 2014, 12:21 PM) *
Wow, already a toe dip in the dune!



A little more than just a toe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Jan 30 2014, 07:01 PM
Post #366


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1075
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



Sol 528 navcam pan of the gap. Nice view beyond.
Attached Image

(Done with Photoshop. Can't seem to be able to join the dune crest correctly.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 30 2014, 07:11 PM
Post #367


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4256
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 30 2014, 04:27 PM) *
It rises just to the left of the 'northern' most base of Mt Sharp - a bearing of 69 degrees.

Thanks for all the numbers. It's clear that evening star Earth pushes you to later DTE uplinks, and topography can make that worse.

The particular orientation of the gap, though, helps in this case. On this map I've sketched a few lines with 69 degree bearing. Passing more or less straight through should mean neither cliff will block the earth - see the green line:
Attached Image

However, getting close behind one cliff or the other could cause problems - see the red lines. Still, the cliffs are only a few metres tall, so to block the sky more than 10 degrees up you'd need to be closer than roughly 20 metres to the cliff.

Of course the route we take through the gap will be dictated by surface conditions - they must allow us to keep sufficiently far from the cliffs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Jan 30 2014, 07:26 PM
Post #368


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Sol 528 Navcam pan smile.gif



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jan 30 2014, 07:43 PM
Post #369


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2852
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The view on Sol 527.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jan 30 2014, 08:18 PM
Post #370


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2852
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



My view of the Sol 528 NL B panorama.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Jan 31 2014, 12:38 AM
Post #371


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



interesting (de)constructions around here.
dune edges terminating 'into' the gap makes for amusing stereograms
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jan 31 2014, 06:34 AM
Post #372


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



The protruding outcrop just right of center in this image seems to have some interesting co!ors that might be worthy of further study. I think I am detecting a greenish cast, which would suggest chemically reduced iron and the possibility that organic compounds could have been preserved in the rock. unsure.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jan 31 2014, 01:32 PM
Post #373


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2852
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Another view of the Sol 528 NL B panorama. ( Added and removed a few images )

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Actionman_*
post Jan 31 2014, 01:52 PM
Post #374





Guests






QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Jan 31 2014, 01:34 AM) *
The protruding outcrop just right of center in this image seems to have some interesting co!ors that might be worthy of further study. I think I am detecting a greenish cast, which would suggest chemically reduced iron and the possibility that organic compounds could have been preserved in the rock. unsure.gif


Looks promising, we should be doing a slow walk-by in that area it looks like smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
Post #375


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



Two false-color versions, this one showing enhanced hue with reduced brightness differences, after some white-balancing:

The bluish-greenish hue of the rock becomes obvious.

This image enhances colors similar to the rock as dark:


Not quite obvoius to me is, whether the almost unique color is due to reduced dust covering by inclination, texture and wind, due to reflected or scattered sunlight, or due to composition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

62 Pages V  « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th August 2024 - 02:18 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.