Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 3A: In-situ science at the Kimberley, Sol 596 [Apr 10,'14] to 633 [May 18, '14] |
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 3A: In-situ science at the Kimberley, Sol 596 [Apr 10,'14] to 633 [May 18, '14] |
Apr 23 2014, 09:10 AM
Post
#76
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1465 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 09:36 AM
Post
#77
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
Thanks Joe, I really like the lighting of this end-of-the-afternoon mosaic.
Here is a mosaic of MC34 pictures showing really thin rocks and furrows near Curiosity's wheels (sols 603 to 606): -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 11:08 AM
Post
#78
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 07:45 PM
Post
#79
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 17-May 08 Member No.: 4114 |
Per Ken Herkenhoff's latest update http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news/astrogeo...post-drive-data ... Target identified!
QUOTE Later in the day, the rover planners and scientists discussed the drill options, and selected a flat outcrop about 4 meters away, shown in the upper right part of this image. . Left mastcam with a little more context |
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 08:03 PM
Post
#80
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
been enjoying all these little 'Recurring Slope Linea'-seed sand-slides we've been seeing around the Kimberly lately, especially how the cohesive (mechanically dust-locked or..?) top layer moves in small increments as the load piles up. must be seasonal as they all seem to be in a much similar state in their progress. here's a sol606 m34/100 crosseye
|
|
|
||
Apr 23 2014, 08:21 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 08:59 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2014, 11:46 PM
Post
#83
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4246 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Thanks a lot for posting that, atomoid. I'd been hoping someone would check into this. A while ago Herkenhoff suggested that they were due to rover-induced vibration. But your image pair seem to argue against that.
It would be interesting to see any other distant/near pairs, whether they show no change or do show a change. |
|
|
Apr 24 2014, 06:42 AM
Post
#84
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2823 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
Apr 24 2014, 10:06 AM
Post
#85
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
|
|
|
Apr 24 2014, 10:24 AM
Post
#86
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1465 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
Navcam and Chemcam - Sol 609. Got a meter or two closer to the outcrop with a short drive yesterday--seeing something interesting? -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 24 2014, 02:27 PM
Post
#87
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 201 Joined: 16-December 13 Member No.: 7067 |
Driving forward, back, and forward again towards the drill target on 609
http://i.imgur.com/TnwGUSc.gif And from the Haz, just 2 frames |
|
|
Apr 24 2014, 05:36 PM
Post
#88
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 10-May 06 From: Spain Member No.: 770 |
|
|
|
Apr 24 2014, 06:24 PM
Post
#89
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1465 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
Driving forward, back, and forward again towards the drill target on 609 This is the reported track, from 0,0: -------------------- |
|
|
||
Apr 24 2014, 11:56 PM
Post
#90
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 09:33 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |