IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

22 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 3A: In-situ science at the Kimberley, Sol 596 [Apr 10,'14] to 633 [May 18, '14]
jmknapp
post Apr 23 2014, 09:10 AM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



A sol 606 mastcam stitch:



http://zoom.it/kv4C


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Apr 23 2014, 09:36 AM
Post #77


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



Thanks Joe, I really like the lighting of this end-of-the-afternoon mosaic.

Here is a mosaic of MC34 pictures showing really thin rocks and furrows near Curiosity's wheels (sols 603 to 606):


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Apr 23 2014, 11:08 AM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Wonderful work Thom' smile.gif

I love thes MaHLI shots smile.gif
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reed
post Apr 23 2014, 07:45 PM
Post #79


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 87
Joined: 17-May 08
Member No.: 4114



Per Ken Herkenhoff's latest update http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news/astrogeo...post-drive-data ... Target identified!
QUOTE
Later in the day, the rover planners and scientists discussed the drill options, and selected a flat outcrop about 4 meters away, shown in the upper right part of this image.


.

Left mastcam with a little more context

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Apr 23 2014, 08:03 PM
Post #80


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



been enjoying all these little 'Recurring Slope Linea'-seed sand-slides we've been seeing around the Kimberly lately, especially how the cohesive (mechanically dust-locked or..?) top layer moves in small increments as the load piles up. must be seasonal as they all seem to be in a much similar state in their progress. here's a sol606 m34/100 crosseye
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Apr 23 2014, 08:21 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (atomoid @ Apr 23 2014, 09:03 PM) *
must be seasonal


Or rover-induced. A search for before and after images of these features might be interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Apr 23 2014, 08:59 PM
Post #82


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



I did happen check out that very notion with the similar features when we arrived at Kimberley and they were indeed visible in images several meters distant seemed the same as in close up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 23 2014, 11:46 PM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks a lot for posting that, atomoid. I'd been hoping someone would check into this. A while ago Herkenhoff suggested that they were due to rover-induced vibration. But your image pair seem to argue against that.

It would be interesting to see any other distant/near pairs, whether they show no change or do show a change.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Apr 24 2014, 06:42 AM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2823
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The MAST Cam R view on Sol 608.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Apr 24 2014, 10:06 AM
Post #85


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Navcam and Chemcam - Sol 609.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Apr 24 2014, 10:24 AM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Apr 24 2014, 06:06 AM) *
Navcam and Chemcam - Sol 609.


Got a meter or two closer to the outcrop with a short drive yesterday--seeing something interesting?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anticitizen2
post Apr 24 2014, 02:27 PM
Post #87


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 201
Joined: 16-December 13
Member No.: 7067



Driving forward, back, and forward again towards the drill target on 609

http://i.imgur.com/TnwGUSc.gif


And from the Haz, just 2 frames
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dig
post Apr 24 2014, 05:36 PM
Post #88


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-May 06
From: Spain
Member No.: 770



My last image. Sol 609. Navcam Right.



Click on image for full version
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Apr 24 2014, 06:24 PM
Post #89


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (anticitizen2 @ Apr 24 2014, 09:27 AM) *
Driving forward, back, and forward again towards the drill target on 609


This is the reported track, from 0,0:

Attached Image




--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Apr 24 2014, 11:56 PM
Post #90


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



sol606-sol609 baseline MAHLI crosseye, with the little sundial just right of middle
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

22 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 09:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.