IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Instrument commissioning phase, Beginning final approach to the comet
machi
post Jul 24 2014, 02:31 PM
Post #101


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 796
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



We know distance (~5500 km) so resolution is slightly over one hundred meters per pixel (102-103 m/pix).
Images on the ESA's site are 8× magnified.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 24 2014, 03:52 PM
Post #102


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



If you pay attention to last frame, there is a "welding" flat region between the two portions, made of darker material compared to the bright ring all around the contact; my impression about the "white collar" is that it could be made of fresh material exposed during last passages, when volatile substances (previously filling the gap between the two portions) sublimated; obviously, this idea is highly hypothetic! Only spectral analysis, joined to high-resolution morphology, could help to confirm or not this model...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 24 2014, 05:14 PM
Post #103


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8785
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Given the processing & enhancement done to these images & their size in pixels, is the resolution sufficient yet to determine if the albedo differences Dilo noted are real? For example, the bright 'ring' at the lobe contact point in particular sure looks like it might be specular; maybe the rest of the surface appears just as bright from the right illumination angles.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 24 2014, 05:22 PM
Post #104


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10227
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Very nice new images - here's a differently processed version.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jul 24 2014, 05:30 PM
Post #105


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2106
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Looks like new NAVCAM's will be given out daily from now to arrival. Better than OSIRIS weekly I suppose?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 24 2014, 05:50 PM
Post #106


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10227
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The shape model is interesting as well. It may be obvious to people but I should point out that the small peaks are artifacts - they are produced by the spatial interpolation process which converts a sparse set of points to a full DEM.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JohnVV
post Jul 24 2014, 06:59 PM
Post #107


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 890
Joined: 18-November 08
Member No.: 4489



-- edit-
this is the OLD light curve shape file
are you referring to the nasa/jpl/naif shape file


-- the NEW one ( early look)
the animation on the esa page

http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/20..._model_of_comet
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 24 2014, 07:57 PM
Post #108


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10227
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The one just released by ESA, which contains several little spiky hills. I don't want people thinking they are real - for one thing the model is based on the earlier set of images with very low resolution. For another, most of the 'hills' are on the outer edge of the 'big end', which was hardly visible in the images because of the viewing angle.


Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 24 2014, 08:03 PM
Post #109


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10227
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is more like the real resolution of the data. Not to deny the fantastic job the science team has done with such early data. I am only saying the high resolution rendering can't be relied on in every detail.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jul 24 2014, 09:31 PM
Post #110


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



QUOTE (nprev @ Jul 24 2014, 07:14 PM) *
Given the processing & enhancement done to these images & their size in pixels, is the resolution sufficient yet to determine if the albedo differences Dilo noted are real? For example, the bright 'ring' at the lobe contact point in particular sure looks like it might be specular; maybe the rest of the surface appears just as bright from the right illumination angles.

There isn't a final assessment yet, but dilo's hypothesis is well on the same line as the science team considers as likely.
Rosetta-Komet: Ein Blick auf die Oberfläche (Rosetta Comet: A Look onto the Surface) :
QUOTE
Momentan können wir mit Sicherheit lediglich sagen, dass der Halsbereich heller aussieht als der Kopf und der Körper des Kometenkerns“, sagt Holger Sierks vom Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung (MPS), der Leiter des OSIRIS-Teams. Materialunterschiede, unterschiedliche Korngröße oder topographische Einflüsse könnten dafür verantwortlich sein.

Auch wenn die aktuellen Bilder, die aus einer Entfernung von 5500 Kilometern entstanden, noch nicht hochaufgelöst sind, erinnern sie die Wissenschaftler an den Kometen 103P/Hartley. Die NASA-Mission EPOXI hatte diesen Körper 2010 im Vorbeiflug besucht. Während die Enden des länglichen Kometenkerns eine raue Oberfläche aufweisen, erscheint die Mitte glatter. Forscher glauben, dass sich in dieser Taille Material ablagert, das zunächst emittiert wurde, dann aber den Einfluss des Schwerefeldes des Kometen nicht verlassen konnte. Im Bereich der Taille befindet sich der Masseschwerpunkt von 103P/Hartley.

Ob diese Überlegungen auch auf den Halsbereich von 67P zutreffen, ist noch unklar. Eine andere Erklärung für eine hohe Reflektivität in diesem Bereich könnte eine andere Oberflächenzusammensetzung sein. Das OSIRIS-Team hofft, in den nächsten Wochen spektrale Daten des Kamerasystems zu erhalten. Mit Hilfe verschiedener Filter kann OSIRIS mehrere Wellenlängenbereiche aus dem reflektierten Licht herausfiltern. Auf diese Weise lassen sich charakteristische Fingerabdrücke bestimmter Materialien oder Zusammensetzungen identifizieren.

"At the moment we can just tell with certainty, that the collar zone looks brighter than the head and the body of the cometary nucleus", says Holger Sierks of the Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung (MPS), OSIRIS Principal Investigator. Differences of material, different grain size, or topographical influence could be responsible.

Although the current images, which have been taken from a distace of 5500 kilometers, aren't yet highly resolved, they remind the scientists at comet 103P/Hartley. The NASA mission EPOXY visited this body in a 2010 flyby. While the ends of the lengthy cometary nucleus show a rough surface, the mid appears smoother. Researchers think, that material precipitates at this waist, which first has been emitted, but then couldn't escape the influence of the field of gravity of the comet. In the region of the waist the barycenter of 103P/Hartley is located.

Whether these thoughts hold true for the collar zone of 67P, isn't yet clear. Another explication for a high reflexivity in this region could be a different composition of the surface. The OSIRIS team hopes to get spectral data of the camera system within the next weeks. By using different filters OSIRIS can filter out several ranges of wavelengths of the reflected light. That way characteristic fingerprints of certain materials or compositions can be identified.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 24 2014, 10:40 PM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (nprev @ Jul 24 2014, 05:14 PM) *
---the bright 'ring' at the lobe contact point in particular sure looks like it might be specular; maybe the rest of the surface appears just as bright from the right illumination angles.

It was my suspect too... however OSIRIS Principal Investigator Holger Sierk said "The only thing we know for sure at this point is that this neck region appears brighter compared to the head and body of the nucleus,"
(source http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2014-24)



--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jul 24 2014, 11:04 PM
Post #112


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



The big media event will be on 6 August.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 25 2014, 05:49 AM
Post #113


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8785
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Good enough for me, and thanks for the translated information, Gerald. Nice catch, Dilo! smile.gif This mission is growing more exciting by the day.

EDIT: If the impact precipitate origin of the bright area is correct, does that in turn imply that the barycenter of the two lobes is there? If so, this may be evidence that the smaller lobe is a bit denser than the larger one.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Jul 25 2014, 07:49 AM
Post #114


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1452
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



One can probably use the rotation video posted last week to determine the centre of mass of the system, and with that, a rough idea of the relative densities of the two bodies.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jul 25 2014, 08:05 AM
Post #115


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2106
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



They can also use the spacecraft's own acceleration from C-G's gravity, measuring the radio signals once in 'orbit', (if one can call it that?).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

16 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th September 2024 - 03:41 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.