IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

37 Pages V  « < 29 30 31 32 33 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 5A: Pahrump Hills, Sites 42-45, Sol 753-923, Sep 18, 2014-March 12, 2015
algorithm
post Feb 19 2015, 07:05 PM
Post #451


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



Yeah, I noticed that also, didn't spot any tumble or bounce marks though.

Suppose it could have been broken off and catapulted straight into place !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorithm
post Feb 19 2015, 07:51 PM
Post #452


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



MR pan of the current area Sol 901

Attached Image






Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Feb 19 2015, 07:55 PM
Post #453


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Holy cow those are fine laminations in the rock.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorithm
post Feb 19 2015, 07:56 PM
Post #454


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



This image is a cut from my above post,


Attached Image



It's something I have seen many times before but have often wondered, whether the stone caused the trench blink.gif or if the stone just happened to roll/drop into the trench.


So, which came first, the stone or the trench?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorithm
post Feb 19 2015, 08:03 PM
Post #455


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



QUOTE
Holy cow those are fine laminations in the rock.



Looks like it was a really small farmer doing some ploughing! laugh.gif


Joking aside, short lived wet = fine lamination, long lived wet=deeper laminations?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dburt
post Feb 19 2015, 10:27 PM
Post #456


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-January 07
Member No.: 1555



Yes, fine laminations, as also seen elsewhere, but why is low-angle cross-bedding so evident in these layers and elsewhere? This widespread feature would seem to indicate repeated active scouring, as by moving currents, and what kind of a shallow little lake has those?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Feb 19 2015, 11:04 PM
Post #457


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Actually I was about to suggest that such fine laminations would fit suspension settling in a low energy (minimal current) environment. Rather than erratics perhaps the blocky (mudstone/clay) rocks are remnants from final suspension fallout in a no energy, alkaline environment. If so then the water would have been a little deeper than a couple of feet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dburt
post Feb 20 2015, 12:37 AM
Post #458


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-January 07
Member No.: 1555



Umm. If "minimal current," then why the apparent scouring (as revealed by the cross beds)? Slow settling of sediment through quiet water wouldn't seem to imply active erosion, unless I am missing something important.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blue Sky
post Feb 20 2015, 12:39 AM
Post #459


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 20-January 12
From: Florida
Member No.: 6317



It looks to me like the fine lines running lower left to upper
right happened before the larger scale cracks and shattering.
I wonder what that second event was. Maybe just settling?
Or something more dramatic?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Feb 20 2015, 01:21 AM
Post #460


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (dburt @ Feb 20 2015, 12:37 AM) *
Umm. If "minimal current," then why the apparent scouring (as revealed by the cross beds)? .....


To my ageing eyes this seems to be very fine scale cross lamination which would more likely reflect a very low velocity bottom current impacting the suspension settling. This would reflect declining input to a water body. A quite gentle deposition synonymous to the penultimate stage (D) of a Bouma Sequence. But this is Mars and potentially nothing is exactly what it seems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eutectic
post Feb 20 2015, 07:36 AM
Post #461


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 1-March 11
From: Houston, USA
Member No.: 5860



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Feb 19 2015, 02:55 PM) *
Holy cow those are fine laminations in the rock.


What strikes me is their regularity -- they reflect some recurring event. Time to send out the undergrad with a Brunton compass. Because the appearance of the layers is a function the intersection of their geometry with the geometry of the exposed surface I think it's difficult to interpret them with much confidence before working out their true internal geometry. Not that that ever stops anyone. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Feb 20 2015, 04:29 PM
Post #462


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Getting a second look from another angle helps you pin down bed orientations, which is why there was that funny first leg in the sol 862 drive where they drove away from the outcrop, came at it again from the east, and then drove back downhill!

Yes, you're right that the regularity implies a recurring event, usually a seasonal one....wonder if each one of those layers represents a Martian year...


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Feb 20 2015, 05:41 PM
Post #463


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



Could be a varve from annual melts at the rim with sedimentation in a sufficiently deep lake.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Actionman_*
post Feb 20 2015, 07:33 PM
Post #464





Guests






Do the layers have layers?
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Feb 20 2015, 10:30 PM
Post #465


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Anyone got any idea of the surface slope in this area to get the apparent dip in context?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

37 Pages V  « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st June 2024 - 12:05 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.