My Assistant
Lot Of Rocks |
Apr 1 2005, 09:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
This mosaic of 4 Panoramic frames from Sol442 show a strong increase in density of rocks, even big ones! Don't know if could be an issue for further movements toward the hill top?
-------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 9 2005, 07:34 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
To have humans _on_ Mars is more than a PR stunt (athough one might argue that the current US Administration's announcement of this goal is just that); in a larger sense, this is the human destiny.
But having a spacious and well-equipped manned orbiter _at_ Mars with multiple Rovers communicating with the orbiter in real-time via geocentric relay satellites is the reasonable path to travel. Samples could be delivered to the orbiting lab facility using return-to-orbit samplers. A living, breathing observer on Mars would be a wonderful event, but the environmental overhead of keeping the observer in that state would be tremendous at Mars' distance. --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2005, 07:58 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 9 2005, 02:34 AM) To have humans _on_ Mars is more than a PR stunt (athough one might argue that the current US Administration's announcement of this goal is just that); in a larger sense, this is the human destiny. But having a spacious and well-equipped manned orbiter _at_ Mars with multiple Rovers communicating with the orbiter in real-time via geocentric relay satellites is the reasonable path to travel. Samples could be delivered to the orbiting lab facility using return-to-orbit samplers. A living, breathing observer on Mars would be a wonderful event, but the environmental overhead of keeping the observer in that state would be tremendous at Mars' distance. --Bill Actually, no. Keeping a human crew alive and well is probably easier on the surface than in orbit. At least, it's easier assuming you'll be able to use Martian resources to support the manned crew. For example, if there *is* a lot of ice easily available to relatively simple equipment, a crew can use Martian water for drinking, washing and food cultivation, and (through electrolysis) to provide oxygen for breathing. They can also use Martian water and elements in Martian rocks to make rocket fuel to get them back home. Lugging all the Martian resources you want to use all the way up to Mars orbit will be more difficult and probably a good deal more expensive. Most expensive of all is bringing everything you need from Earth. Biocontamination issues aside, a maned Mars landing is probably going to be easier and cheaper than a manned orbital mission. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
dilo Lot Of Rocks Apr 1 2005, 09:19 PM
Sunspot QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 1 2005, 10:19 PM)This mosai... Apr 1 2005, 10:18 PM
Tman I have also some reservations. This spiky high roc... Apr 2 2005, 08:20 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (Tman @ Apr 2 2005, 08:20 AM)I have als... Apr 2 2005, 04:15 PM
djellison QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Apr 2 2005, 04:15 PM)can... Apr 2 2005, 05:16 PM
Jeff7 And remember too, the rover was designed to be abl... Apr 2 2005, 05:35 PM
Buck Galaxy All these sharp rocks will make designing a safe M... Apr 3 2005, 06:28 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (Buck Galaxy @ Apr 3 2005, 06:28 AM)All... Apr 3 2005, 03:17 PM
BruceMoomaw EVA suits present a severe problem for manned Mars... Apr 3 2005, 12:39 PM
Buck Galaxy "...with suited-up EVAs limited to the absolu... Apr 4 2005, 02:22 AM
dilo Now it seems to me that Spirit is avoiding the den... Apr 3 2005, 05:11 PM
Sunspot Which sol are those images of Spirit's tracks ... Apr 3 2005, 06:37 PM
dilo QUOTE (Sunspot @ Apr 3 2005, 06:37 PM)Which s... Apr 4 2005, 04:27 AM
BruceMoomaw "About EVA activity, it seems to me foolish t... Apr 4 2005, 06:40 AM
Buck Galaxy QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 4 2005, 06:40 AM)... Apr 4 2005, 07:36 AM
Tman QUOTE (Buck Galaxy @ Apr 4 2005, 07:36 AM)So ... Apr 4 2005, 08:38 AM
paxdan QUOTE (Buck Galaxy @ Apr 4 2005, 08:36 AM)Sur... Apr 4 2005, 10:28 AM
tedstryk
Well, yes, but if we did it now, there is a chan... Apr 8 2005, 02:23 PM
djellison QUOTE Surely a base or two won't contaminate a... Apr 4 2005, 07:42 AM
BruceMoomaw Buck Galaxy, April 4: "So why not set aside ... Apr 6 2005, 12:56 PM
BruceMoomaw Paxdan: "...If there is life on Mars, searchi... Apr 6 2005, 01:03 PM
Chmee I think not allowing human EVA's is a bit para... Apr 6 2005, 05:15 PM
Mongo Considering the huge cost of a manned Mars program... Apr 6 2005, 08:30 PM
Gray Robert Ballard has an interesting story about his ... Apr 8 2005, 01:07 PM
wyogold I think you are missing an important point about d... Apr 9 2005, 05:17 AM
Jeff7 QUOTE (dvandorn @ Apr 9 2005, 02:58 AM)Actual... Apr 9 2005, 08:40 AM
Mode5 A spacecraft in orbit with humans on board will be... Apr 9 2005, 09:20 AM
cIclops The difference between remote operations from Eart... Apr 9 2005, 10:43 AM
TheChemist Todays PanCam depository on Exploratorium consists... Apr 9 2005, 03:11 PM
dilo QUOTE (TheChemist @ Apr 9 2005, 03:11 PM)Toda... Apr 9 2005, 09:00 PM
Mode5 QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 9 2005, 09:00 PM)QUOTE (The... Apr 10 2005, 11:15 PM
dilo QUOTE (Mode5 @ Apr 10 2005, 11:15 PM)Great pi... Apr 13 2005, 05:48 AM
Mode5 QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 13 2005, 05:48 AM)QUOTE (Mo... Apr 13 2005, 07:36 AM
Bill Harris QUOTE Actually, no. Keeping a human crew alive and... Apr 10 2005, 10:16 AM
BruceMoomaw Getting back for a moment to whether humans should... Apr 10 2005, 02:38 PM
cIclops QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 10 2005, 02:38 PM)th... Apr 10 2005, 02:54 PM

Mode5 QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 10 2005, 02:54 PM)QUOTE ... Apr 11 2005, 12:48 AM
David QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 10 2005, 02:38 PM)By... Apr 13 2005, 03:11 PM
Jeff7 Mention of a crewed orbiter around Venus brought u... Apr 10 2005, 02:43 PM
BruceMoomaw Me: "...the problem is that [landed humans] W... Apr 11 2005, 05:07 AM
Bill Harris Good post(s), Bruce. The critical problem we face... Apr 11 2005, 09:25 AM
Jeff7 QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 11 2005, 04:25 AM)Go... Apr 11 2005, 02:54 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 11 2005, 04:25 AM)Ad... Apr 11 2005, 03:22 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE However, if we *do* intend to put humans on ... Apr 11 2005, 04:11 PM
Buck Galaxy So how long do we wait? Say MSL or some other rov... Apr 13 2005, 06:07 AM
Bill Harris QUOTE So how long do we wait? Say MSL or some othe... Apr 13 2005, 06:58 AM
paxdan QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 13 2005, 07:58 AM)QU... Apr 13 2005, 07:46 AM
cIclops QUOTE (paxdan @ Apr 13 2005, 07:46 AM)<sni... Apr 13 2005, 08:30 AM
paxdan QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 13 2005, 09:30 AM)QUOTE ... Apr 13 2005, 01:57 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE Well those millions of kilometres of vacuum ... Apr 13 2005, 12:42 PM
Gray Hmm, this topic seems to have split into two conve... Apr 13 2005, 01:21 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:44 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|